International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @thekobeissiletter. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
19 measurements spanning 50 days, net -6,852. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 09:19
85,050
-267
19 Sept 2026, 14:00
85,317
+85,301
17 Sept 2026, 11:36
16
-85,645
17 Sept 2026, 03:37
85,661
-253
15 Sept 2026, 01:19
85,914
-225
13 Sept 2026, 07:39
86,139
-278
11 Sept 2026, 11:55
86,417
-335
8 Sept 2026, 19:35
86,752
-548
5 Sept 2026, 13:00
87,300
-169
4 Sept 2026, 13:18
87,469
-3,056
14 Aug 2026, 19:07
90,525
-228
13 Aug 2026, 06:54
90,753
-113
12 Aug 2026, 09:07
90,866
-287
11 Aug 2026, 06:25
91,153
-156
10 Aug 2026, 04:13
91,309
-177
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
91,486
-200
8 Aug 2026, 04:52
91,686
-188
7 Aug 2026, 04:10
91,874
-28
7 Aug 2026, 00:48
91,902
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 85,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
119 (5 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
51,300
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 03:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
❤️ Uploading Àveñgers Doomsdãy ❤️
🔰first on the channel 🔥📥
Click on JOIN ✅ and stay tuned
❤️👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻❤️
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD! 🤯
Àveñgers Doomsdãy
Link expiring in 10min ☝️☝️
Avengers: Doomsday (2026)
Heroes from three different worlds must unite when they're thrust together to confront a catastrophic danger that could destroy everything they know.
Runtime: 165 min
🌍 Country Origin: #UnitedStates
🎭 Genres: #Action, #Adventure, #Sci-Fi
The world's largest oil companies are now holding a record cash pile:
The top 5 international oil companies generated almost ~$70 billion in free cash
flow in Q2 2026, the largest amount on record.
This includes ExxonMobil, $XOM, Chevron, $CVX, Shell, $SHEL, TotalEnergies,
$TTE, and BP, $BP.
This marks a +600% quarter-over-quarter increase.
By comparison, the previous peak of ~$60 billion was set in Q2 2022, …
The quality of US job openings data is deteriorating:
Only roughly 1 in 4 businesses approached by the BLS now agree to participate in
the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), near the lowest since 2022.
By comparison, before the 2020 pandemic, the so-called initiation rate
oscillated between 50% and 70%.
Meanwhile, the first closing response rate, measuring firms that provide data in
time for the initi…
Inflation expectations are easing among Americans:
US consumers' median inflation expectations over the next 12 months fell to
~4.5% in July, near the lowest since Q1 2025.
This follows a brief spike to ~5.2% in March, the highest level since August
2025.
At the same time, average inflation expectations declined to ~5.5%, down from
6.2% recorded in March.
Both measures are now ~1.5 percentage points below their p…
Nvidia is dominating retail investor demand across the Magnificent 7:
Retail investors have bought +$27 billion worth of Nvidia, $NVDA, stock over
the last year, the most among all Magnificent 7 companies.
Since October 2025, these purchases have more than quadrupled.
Tesla, $TSLA, ranked 2nd, with +$15 billion in retail purchases over the last
year.
Over the same period, retail investors bought +$9 billion wor…
The ETF industry is experiencing an unprecedented boom.
~900 new ETFs have been launched in the US year-to-date, on track for the
strongest year on record.
At the current pace, ~1,470 new ETFs are expected to launch in 2026, surpassing
the ~1,050 all-time high set in 2025.
Meanwhile, leveraged ETFs now account for ~300 of the new launches year-to-date,
or ~33% of the total.
By comparison, 200 leveraged ETFs were …
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @Avengers_Doomsday_Moviie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Avengers_Doomsday_Moviie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@justindross named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Avengers Doomsday @Avengers_Doomsday_2026_Movie1 · 31,968 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
Sky Sports Football | Soccer @TheFootballCity · 267,464 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Dune Part Three • Dune 3 @Dune_Part_Three_Moviee · 30,179 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
RYNOX TRADES 📈 @RynoxTrades · 29,181 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
NF Official Airdrop @NFOfficialAirdrop · 40,412 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 NEWS @Crypto_FDNEW · 40,241 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
Hamster Digest @hamster_digest · 391,416 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Bihar Daroga Police BPSC Teacher ™ @Bihar_Daroga_Police_BPSC_Teacher · 143,271 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Dheeraj Mehra @dheerajmehra1 · 31,406 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
iPapkorn @iPapkorn · 1,881,707 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
Nifty 50 Player @nifty50player · 31,616 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
JTET JSSC JPSC Jharkhand Police GK ™ @JTET_JSSC_JPSC_Jharkhand_Police · 184,415 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Avengers Doomsday” (@Avengers_Doomsday_Moviie), 85,050 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Avengers_Doomsday_Moviie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.