Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚽ Football is Life ⚽

Channel

⚽ Football is Life ⚽

@Footballislife_01

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25,377subscribers

+923 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002807985881
TypeChannel
Username@Footballislife_01
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Footballislife_01

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

24,45425,37724,915.57 August 2026 — 24,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,586 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,766 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,767 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,865 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,914 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,008 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,377 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +923. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,316–25,515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:4825,377+369
14 Aug 2026, 18:5525,008+94
13 Aug 2026, 08:5624,914+49
12 Aug 2026, 06:2224,865+98
11 Aug 2026, 07:5324,767+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:3324,766+67
9 Aug 2026, 10:3124,699+113
8 Aug 2026, 07:0124,586+132
7 Aug 2026, 19:1524,454no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:0224,454first reading

Engagement

176 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 25,377 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,120
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
176
of 176 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 163 of 168 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held176 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total691,739
Reactions total10,187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 30s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,187 reactions across 163 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,92368.0%
👍7257.12%
🔥6015.90%
👏5084.99%
🤣3042.98%
😁2302.26%
🕊1611.58%
👎1511.48%
🥰1451.42%
💔810.795%
570.56%
😭540.53%
🌚390.383%
🤪340.334%
😱260.255%
🥴240.236%
🤮210.206%
💩200.196%
🤯180.177%
💯170.167%
9 further kinds480.471%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 163 of the 176 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 168 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Footballislife_01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 176 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC≈2,770 views115 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: João Félix with his 'Best Player of the Saudi Pro League' award! 🇵🇹💫

96🔥10💯9

15 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC≈3,680 views55 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

FINAL #AlavésGetafe 3-0 💙 The first match of #LALIGAEASPORTS 26/27 is won by Alaves! What a game 🎯

55

15 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC≈3,580 views55 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Mika Godts: “I’m a player who LOVES to dribble. It’s one of my main qualities.” “I’m an attacking player, I like to score goals and provide assists.” “But the most important thing for me is helping the team, keeping the right mentality and making the fans happy.” “Off the pitch, I’m a calm person and very close to my family.”

46👍9

15 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈3,830 views68 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: PSG have announced the arrival of Mika Godts. €45M + €10M total package.

👍489👎5🔥5🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈4,220 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐇𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐃 𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐈𝐍 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐃 😍 His first game for the Reds since December 2024 😲🔴

36🤣1

15 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈4,480 views129 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

A goal on his Chelsea debut for £117m signing Morgan Rogers against Real Sociedad in the Blues' final pre-season match 🔵😍

102🔥27

15 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈4,650 views95 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐌 𝐆𝐄𝐓𝐒 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐒𝐓 𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐑 𝐓𝐄𝐀𝐌 😬💪 After 3 pre-season games, Ruben Amorim has now won his first game as Milan head coach ✔️👔 It's only Man United's second pre-season loss, as Milan get a crazy 4-2 win 😅

😁6322👏9😢1

15 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈5,460 views90 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐒𝐄𝐀 𝐅𝐋𝐘𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐈𝐍 𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐇𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐌𝐄 💪🔵 João Pedro continues his ridiculous form with a 𝘽𝙍𝘼𝘾𝙀, making it 7 goals in 5 pre-season games 😮‍💨 Morgan Rogers scores his first goal and celebrates with his friend Cole Palmer. Be ready for this 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗗 combination in the Premier League 🥶 Enzo Fernández comes on as he returns to the pitch for Chelsea ©️ Xabi Alonso's first game at Stamford Bridge and straight to winning 👍

76🔥14

15 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈5,790 views85 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🚨⚽️ 𝗚𝗢𝗔𝗟: JOAO PEDRO PUTS CHELSEA BACK IN THE LEAD! 🔥 WHAT A HEADER! 🔵 Chelsea [2-1] Real Sociedad

85

15 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈6,360 views129 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Rodgers Goal for Chelsea

106🔥15💯8

Showing the 12 most recent of 176 posts we hold for @Footballislife_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll677 voters

Vote Who's winning the Community shield trophy on Sunday? 🏆🤯

  1. Arsenal 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿33%
  2. Manchester City 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿70%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll482 voters

Who will win the Super Cup final? 🤯

  1. PSG63%
  2. Aston Villa41%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 176 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 929,909 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚽ Football is Life ⚽” (@Footballislife_01), 25,377 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Footballislife_01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.