Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚽ Football is Life ⚽

Channel

⚽ Football is Life ⚽

@Footballislife_01

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

27,740subscribers

+3,286 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002807985881
TypeChannel
Username@Footballislife_01
Description⚽ Football Is Life ⚽ Your daily home for football news, transfer updates, match highlights, predictions, from around the world. 📢 For advertisment Contact 👉 @Chelseaforlife1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Footballislife_01

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

24,45427,74026,0977 August 2026 — 24,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,586 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,766 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,767 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,865 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,914 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,008 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,377 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,516 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,574 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,613 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,719 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,849 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,976 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,006 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,097 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,113 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,176 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,462 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,466 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,665 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,656 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,701 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,696 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,831 subscribers8 September 2026 — 27,215 subscribers11 September 2026 — 27,584 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,630 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,623 subscribers16 September 2026 — 27,620 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27,726 subscribers24 September 2026 — 27,740 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 48 days, net +3,286. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,961–28,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 22:3527,740+14
18 Sept 2026, 19:3827,726+106
16 Sept 2026, 13:3727,620-3
14 Sept 2026, 15:5627,623-7
13 Sept 2026, 02:4127,630+46
11 Sept 2026, 02:4227,584+369
8 Sept 2026, 02:2027,215+384
5 Sept 2026, 00:4126,831+135
3 Sept 2026, 08:3926,696-5
2 Sept 2026, 04:4726,701+45
1 Sept 2026, 04:0326,656-9
31 Aug 2026, 05:1826,665+199
30 Aug 2026, 03:3726,466+4
29 Aug 2026, 06:3826,462+286
28 Aug 2026, 05:2826,176+63
27 Aug 2026, 01:5226,113+16
25 Aug 2026, 22:4526,097+91
24 Aug 2026, 20:4826,006+30
23 Aug 2026, 08:4525,976+127
21 Aug 2026, 21:5825,849first reading

Engagement

676 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 27,740 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
191
of 676 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 181 of 188 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held676 (6 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total748,877
Reactions total10,947
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,960
Videos
≈1
Links
≈54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 03s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

37,116 reactions across 632 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24,64766.4%
🔥2,9267.88%
👍2,5816.95%
🤣2,1765.86%
👏1,1052.98%
😁9432.54%
👎4611.24%
🥰2820.76%
😭2100.566%
💔2070.558%
🕊1620.436%
💩1280.345%
🙏1270.342%
😱1030.278%
⚡950.256%
💯940.253%
🤩800.216%
🤔740.199%
🎉710.191%
🫡700.189%
28 further kinds5741.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 636 of the 676 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 676 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 659 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Footballislife_01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 676 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,030 views34 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: The disagreement between Cristiano Ronaldo and Portugal manager Jorge Jesus has been RESOLVED. The president of the Portuguese FA even travelled to Denmark to help resolve the situation. “Peace has returned to the Portugal dressing room.” Cristiano Ronaldo and Jorge Jesus are expected to address the situation at today’s press conference. — RTPNoticias

❤23🤣7❤‍🔥4

30 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,200 views41 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗠𝗘𝗗: Portugal FA President Pedro Proença has arrived in Denmark for the crisis meeting. Cristiano Ronaldo wants to clarify whether he is still being counted on after NOT liking how Jorge Jesus handled things in the last game vs Norway. — Record_Portugal

❤33👎7🥰1

30 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈2,070 views23 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Cristiano Ronaldo did NOT take part in yesterday’s training session, REFUSED to work in the gym, and left to return to the hotel. The situation comes amid growing TENSION between Cristiano and Portugal head coach Jorge Jesus — abolapt

❤20🤣3

30 Sept 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,430 views34 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨🗣️ 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Roy Keane says he would throw his Manchester City medals “IN THE BIN” if he were one of their players: “If I was a player with that bit of success and praise that we’ve given a lot of credit for, I’d be 100% sticking them medals IN THE BIN.” Asked if he would feel let down by the club: “Oh, 100%. Of course you would. It’s CHEATING.”

❤27👎7

29 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC≈3,690 views82 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧: Chelsea faced all of these 4 teams in their prime and won 4 out of 4 times! 👀

❤79👍3

29 Sept 2026, 22:30 UTC≈3,760 views61 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🕺🏾🍿 𝐆𝐎𝐀𝐋. 𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐒𝐓. 𝐆𝐎𝐀𝐋. 𝐑𝐄𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐓. 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐒 𝐈𝐒 𝐋𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐘𝐀𝐌𝐀𝐋, 𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐍𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏𝐏𝐀𝐁𝐋𝐄 𝐀𝐆𝐀𝐈𝐍. 🇪🇸 Lamine delivers a 𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐄 plus also 𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐒𝐓 for Pubill’s goal 🤯 Yamal already reached 𝟏𝟖 𝐆/𝐀 in the last 8 games, insane 👑 …he’s at 𝟒 𝐆/𝐀 in 2 games with Spain, 2 goals and 1 assist 😱 𝐖𝐡𝐨’𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡? 🤷🏽‍♂️

🔥49❤11👎1

29 Sept 2026, 21:46 UTC≈3,590 views65 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Raphinha is FINE, following his discomfort in the game vs. Australia. The player's camp has confirmed that the discomfort is MINOR. — FCBRAC1

❤64💩1

29 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC≈3,830 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026

⚽️ GOAL! Harry Kane Czechia 0 – 2 England 69' #CZEENG #UEFANationsLeague

❤16

29 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC≈3,830 views15 reactionsread 30 September 2026

⚽️ GOAL! Nico Williams 🅰️ Assist: Mikel Merino Spain 4 – 1 Croatia 89' #ESPCRO #UEFANationsLeague

❤15

29 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC≈3,970 views15 reactionsread 30 September 2026

⚽️ GOAL! Anthony Gordon Czechia 0 – 1 England 47' #CZEENG #UEFANationsLeague

❤15

29 Sept 2026, 19:40 UTC≈4,060 views35 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 La Liga president Javier Tebas on Man City punishment: “I believe it should be the STRICTEST punishment in the Premier League regulations”. “It must serve as an example. Violating the rules for over 10 years is a very serious thing”, told FIFPRO.

👍27❤6👎2

29 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈4,330 views40 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: Premier League confirm an independent Commission has found Manchester City GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES related to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules over a nine-season period, and the majority of charges in relation to its failure to co-operate with the League’s investigation. The club has the right to appeal the independent Commission’s findings and has until Friday 2 October to ex…

❤40

Showing the 12 most recent of 676 posts we hold for @Footballislife_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTCAnonymous Poll439 voters

Who will win ?

  1. England29%
  2. Draw7%
  3. Spain66%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll796 voters

Arsenal fans do you want Julian Alvarez at Emirates?

  1. Yes , we want him44%
  2. No, We don't want him59%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTCAnonymous Poll677 voters

Vote Who's winning the Community shield trophy on Sunday? 🏆🤯

  1. Arsenal 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿33%
  2. Manchester City 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿70%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll482 voters

Who will win the Super Cup final? 🤯

  1. PSG63%
  2. Aston Villa41%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 676 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚽ Football is Life ⚽” (@Footballislife_01), 27,740 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Footballislife_01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.