Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,481–5,613 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:16
5,500
+4
13 Sept 2026, 03:56
5,496
-4
9 Sept 2026, 14:01
5,500
-4
4 Sept 2026, 16:01
5,504
-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:36
5,508
-13
29 Aug 2026, 01:44
5,521
-9
25 Aug 2026, 20:05
5,530
-9
22 Aug 2026, 23:38
5,539
-9
19 Aug 2026, 18:05
5,548
-14
16 Aug 2026, 22:05
5,562
-10
13 Aug 2026, 10:26
5,572
-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
5,574
-24
7 Aug 2026, 06:26
5,598
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:45
5,598
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,000 reactions across 21 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
383
38.3%
❤
200
20.0%
😁
139
13.9%
💯
67
6.70%
👍
65
6.50%
🏆
41
4.10%
🤝
33
3.30%
❤🔥
27
2.70%
🤣
20
2.00%
😎
12
1.20%
👏
11
1.10%
✍
1
0.1%
💘
1
0.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sasha_ogunga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Слей свой самый главный продукт бесплатно
В моём золотом фонде воронок разберу крайне парадоксальную механику, в которой можно заработать больше, если слить бесплатно свой основной продукт.
Проблема многих в инфобизнесе — жадность. Они пыхтят над своим «златом», над своим «курсом», и даже близким его бесплатно не дают. Понять можно: ты вложил душу.
Но, жадный подход иногда крайне невыгоден. С нюансами и оговорками…
Человек сам жадно
читает прогрев
Есть один парадокс. Чем сильнее человек чувствует, что ему что-то продают, тем сильнее он сопротивляется.
Поэтому большинство прогревов сегодня работают всё хуже.
Можно бесконечно писать посты, записывать кружочки, проводить эфиры. А можно сделать так, чтобы человек сам захотел пройти весь путь до покупки.
В моем золотом фонде механик и воронок, я покажу метод, который превращает …
Люди сами создадут
тебе продукт
Представьте, что люди сами создают вам воронку и продукт, а ваша задача — просто их координация и создание ссылки на оплату. Звучит утопично? Согласен, но это проверено и прекрасно работает.
В моем золотом фонде воронок поделюсь механикой, в которой любой ваш клиент и подписчик, вовлеченный в воронку, своим же вовлечением будет создавать продукт.
Нет, это не про очередной дурацкий к…
Павла Дурова признали экстремистом, что важно понимать:
1. Телегой пользоваться можно, это не делает вас экстремистом. Вообще. Никак.
2. Премиум покупать можно: юрлицо Телеги не стало экстремистским, оно отдельно от Паши. Можете хоть миллион долларов отправить на юрлицо телеграм — это не сделает вас ни экстремистом, ни пособником, ни кем-то ещё.
3. Донатить матёрому экстремисту Павлу лично, прямо на его личные сче…
Не трать время
К разделу с комментариями принято относиться «снисходительно»:
Не трать на это время!
Зачем ты споришь?
Кому и что доказываешь?
Как профессиональный спортсмен в дисциплине дискуссий в комментариях, я никогда не тратил время на такие замечания. Спорил, веселился и буду веселиться. Но дело не только в веселье.
Из хорошего спора в комментариях или тредсе тоже можно сделать воронку. Люди любят «смотрет…
Перевернуть воронку
вверх ногами
Я люблю находить нестандартные решения и одно из таких — перевернуть воронку вверх ногами.
Как мы привыкли думать?
Есть 1000 просмотров,
из них 300 заинтересованных,
из них 100 обращений
из них 50 продаж
Вверху широкая часть воронки. Внизу — узкая. Классическое.
А можно ли сделать наоборот? Из узкой части делать воронку шире и шире? Чтобы из 1000 просмотров получалось не 100 обра…
Надо просто сделать ХОРОШИЙ ПРОДУКТ и он сам себя продаст
Я всегда балдею от этого тезиса, который пришел к нам из попсовых книжек про бизнес.
Тезис хорошо лёг на бизнесменов из девяностых, которые работали в условиях, когда НЕТ НИХЕРА. Если ты начал делать или завозить хороший продукт — он разлетался сам. Так и закрепилась идея, что «надо делать хороший продукт».
Дорогие друзья, амбассадоры данного тезиса, у меня…
❤🔥12🔥6❤3🏆3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sasha_ogunga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Артем Сенаторов печатает... @senatorov_art · 31,418 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
Альберт Сафин @safin4 · 68,648 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Света Афанасьева @engageforsales · 28,984 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Анастасия ko_sha @koshechkiklub · 26,570 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Канал Ирины Подрез @ipodrez · 29,443 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Тата Феодориди @TatFeodoridy · 60,022 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Саша Огунга про контент” (@sasha_ogunga), 5,500 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sasha_ogunga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.