8 measurements spanning 16 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,701–7,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 15:36
7,709
+5
20 Aug 2026, 09:26
7,704
-9
17 Aug 2026, 11:03
7,713
-6
14 Aug 2026, 07:18
7,719
+1
11 Aug 2026, 04:15
7,718
-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:20
7,723
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:45
7,726
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:39
7,726
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 7,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
9 (6 August 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
13,378
Reactions total
2,075
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,075 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,518
73.2%
❤🔥
217
10.5%
🔥
146
7.04%
🎉
87
4.19%
🕊
71
3.42%
🤩
17
0.819%
💯
9
0.434%
🙏
8
0.386%
👏
2
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,075reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stolyarovajulia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, важный момент🤍
С аккаунта @stolyarovaspace вам пишет моя команда – это мои помощники, не спам. Они рассказывают о моих проектах и отвечают на вопросы. Не игнорируйте, пожалуйста.
И маленький подарок: если напишете им сами – в честь непростого коридора затмений вам бесплатно откроют мою свежую медитацию на возврат ресурса.
Просто напишите волшебное слово «Медитация», и вас подхватят))
Доверие в отношениях - это не выписка гарантии на отсутствие предательства, измены или надежды на исполнение обещанных условий.
Доверие - это уверенное соприкосновение с неизвестным.
И это «место» лежит во внутреннем мире, его не может обеспечить партнер. Партнер может красиво с этим местом резонировать🤍
Вернулись в Москву🤍
Считается, что для того, чтобы полностью перезагрузиться на море нужен 21 день, как введение новой привычки в рутину будней. Именно это до отлета сказал мне Лео и я подумала, что до родов, старта школы - это не такая уж и плохая затея. Мы были 22 ночи и это было как-то идеально.
На каждом острове, что мы меняли, было много русских. На последнем я даже встретила на прогулке знакомую с детьми и да…
8 лет Ярославу🤍
И моему материнству одновременно. А еще и затмение сегодня ко всему прочему.
Настолько насыщенный сегодня был день, что не было ни минуты покоя, чтобы написать что-то осмысленное. Сделать праздник для уже такого взрослого человека - это вам не в магазин за хлебом сходить😄
Мне очень интересно наблюдать за развитием сознания уже не ребенка, но еще и не взрослого. Такой другой, внимательный этап рассма…
Моя день рожденческая крошка🍊
2 года малышке уже.
Совершенно кайфовое, красивое, сладенькое создание получилось))
В первые 1.5 недели она ходить по песку боялась - проваливалась стопа, небезопасно было человеку.
Сейчас уже бегает по песочку, засовывает пальцы в домики крабов, делает пироженки из фигурок с песком - детские радости и открытия это просто кайф!
С водой было также. Всего 2 дня назад она перестала нап…
Рандом🤍
Купаться, гулять, вкусно есть, ничего не делать, вести рабочие звонки, снова ничего не делать, запустить месячное сопровождение групп, сходить на массаж, просыпаться в 7 утра, засыпать в 22, осознавать, что рожать в следующем месяце, надо бы думать о выборе акушерки (мои обе в отъездах в это время🤧), но хотеть продлиться еще на недельку😂
Скоро дни рождения детей🤍
Не верится, что Эллине уже 2. Ярославу 8. И …
❤177❤🔥26🔥17
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @stolyarovajulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 637,027 of 1,601,189entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мария Бразговская @MBrazgovskaia · 56,193 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
KATIA TXI @KatiaTxiLive · 103,709 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Тата Феодориди @TatFeodoridy · 60,203 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Астролог Павел Андреев @mylablife · 100,232 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Столярова” (@stolyarovajulia), 7,709 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stolyarovajulia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.