National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 59 days, net -1,038. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,720–87,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 19:16
85,876
-139
27 Sept 2026, 00:37
86,015
-126
19 Sept 2026, 17:36
86,141
-36
17 Sept 2026, 07:38
86,177
-41
15 Sept 2026, 06:59
86,218
-30
13 Sept 2026, 17:56
86,248
-38
11 Sept 2026, 22:16
86,286
-52
9 Sept 2026, 13:37
86,338
-70
6 Sept 2026, 02:38
86,408
-18
3 Sept 2026, 20:39
86,426
-25
2 Sept 2026, 09:02
86,451
-19
1 Sept 2026, 05:55
86,470
-25
31 Aug 2026, 06:32
86,495
-12
30 Aug 2026, 07:54
86,507
-16
29 Aug 2026, 08:07
86,523
-17
28 Aug 2026, 08:17
86,540
-14
27 Aug 2026, 10:14
86,554
-22
26 Aug 2026, 13:36
86,576
-18
25 Aug 2026, 14:25
86,594
-5
24 Aug 2026, 17:39
86,599
first reading
Engagement
1,088 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.99%
avg views ÷ 85,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,430
572 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
572
of 1,088 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
1,088 (5 August 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
1,961,109
Reactions total
21,977
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 02:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,630
Videos
≈214
Links
≈15,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 09s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,742 reactions across 998 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,967
23.1%
👀
4,904
12.7%
👍
4,629
11.9%
😁
4,331
11.2%
🙈
3,784
9.77%
🤯
2,647
6.83%
😢
2,517
6.50%
🔥
2,467
6.37%
🤔
1,567
4.04%
😱
1,436
3.71%
😭
865
2.23%
👏
483
1.25%
🎉
85
0.219%
🤩
51
0.132%
🥰
9
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,742 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧫 Правительство РФ утвердило стратегию развития биоэкономики и рассчитывает вырастить рынок до ₽1 трлн
Премьер-министр Михаил Мишустин объявил об утверждении стратегии развития биоэкономики до 2036 года.
Стратегия затронет АПК, медицину, ветеринарию, энергетику, ЖКХ и экологию. Производителям создадут условия для выпуска биотоплива, новых материалов, удобрений, кормовых добавок, лекарств и медоборудования.
Цели на…
📲 «Т-Технологии» подали заявку в ЦБ для легального выхода на крипторынок
Компании группы «Т-Технологии» (куда входит Т-Банк) направили документы в Банк России для включения в государственные реестры криптооператоров.
После получения разрешения ЦБ сервис пройдет внутреннее тестирование на сотрудниках, после чего станет доступен широкой аудитории.
Т-Банк рассчитывает интегрировать возможность покупки, продажи и хран…
Владимир Путин разрешил провести реорганизацию "Юникредит банка" и выкупить у итальянской UniCredit S.p.A. 100% акций российской "дочки".
@pro.news | @pro.news в max
🛢️ Глава Saudi Aramco предупредил о критическом истощении мировых запасов нефти
Генеральный директор Saudi Aramco Амин Нассер заявил, что мировые резервы нефти находятся на «пугающе низком» уровне, а на их восполнение уйдет до двух лет.
Причина дефицита: эскалация конфликта на Ближнем Востоке вокруг Ирана сократила мировые поставки примерно на 3 миллиарда баррелей.
Для перекрытия дефицита из запасов уже выпустили …
Ученики pro.finansy получают свои первые дивиденды 😍
Хотите, чтобы крупные компании делились с вами прибылью?
Приходите в этот четверг и пятницу на лекции Оли «Инвестиции в акциях, в рублях и долларах».
На лекциях вы узнаете, как выбирать акции и получать дополнительный доход.
Стоимость лекций: 0₽, но надо зарегистрироваться до 8 октября (вкл)!
⛏️ Минфин смягчил налог на сверхдоходы для металлургов
Министерство финансов учло критику предпринимателей и пересмотрело условия налога на сверхдоходы (windfall tax) для горно-металлургического сектора на 2026–2028 годы, сгладив финансовую нагрузку на компании.
Налог (20% для золота, 30% для остальных) сработает только при условии, что рублевые цены на сырье вырастут более чем на 10% к уровню 2025 года. Если рыноч…
💎 На аукционе Калининградского янтарного комбината продали редкий самородок с ископаемым цветком
Янтарный самородок весом около 35 г с древним цветком внутри ушел с молотка за 157 тысяч рублей при стартовой цене в 40 тысяч.
Образец добыт в Приморском карьере.
@pro.news | @pro.news в max
🎯ЦБ назвал уровень ключевой ставки для достижения инфляции в 4% к 2027 году
Зампред Банка России Алексей Заботкин на парламентских слушаниях в Совете Федерации заявил, что цель по инфляции в 4% будет достигнута при средней ключевой ставке 10,5–12,5% в 2027 году.
По прогнозу ЦБ, после удерживаемой сейчас ставки в 14%, к 2027 году показатель снизится до 10,5–12,5%, а к 2029 году опустится до нейтральных 7,5–8,5%.
Чт…
💼 Минфин спрогнозировал рост реальных доходов россиян и индексацию выплат в 2027 году
Министр финансов Антон Силуанов выступая в Совете Федерации раскрыл ключевые социальные параметры трёхлетнего бюджета.
В 2027 году реальные доходы населения вырастут на 1,4%, а в 2028–2029 годах - в среднем на 2,5% ежегодно.
- МРОТ вырастет до 28 935 рублей (рост на 6,8%);
- Прожиточный минимум составит 20 227 рублей;
- Маткапита…
⛽ Economist сообщил о рекордно низком уровне запасов газа в Европе
Подземные хранилища газа (ПХГ) в Европе к началу октября заполнены лишь на 72%, что является рекордно низким показателем для этого времени года, передает ТАСС со ссылкой на The Economist.
В 2022–2025 годах средний уровень заполненности ПХГ к этому периоду составлял 90%.
ПХГ Германии и Нидерландов заполнены примерно на 60%, Великобритании - менее че…
⚡️ГЛАВНЫЕ НОВОСТИ ЗА ЭТУ НЕДЕЛЮ
В новом выпуске новостей вы узнаете:
- какие налоги нужно оплатить до 1 декабря
- что изменилось с микрозаймами
- как теперь пополнять счет наличными через банкоматы других банков
- зачем OpenAI выпустила подписку за $500
- что с российскими и американскими акциями
📺СМОТРЕТЬ НА YOUTUBE
📺СМОТРЕТЬ НА RUTUBE
💙СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК
📝СМОТРЕТЬ НА ДЗЕН
❤15🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,088 posts we hold for @profinansy_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@profinansy_news edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Закон и финансы | pro.finansy @zf_profinansy · 22,369 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
pro.finansy | дети @pro_finansy_kids · 63,098 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
52 недели богатства | pro.finansy @weeks52wealth · 32,307 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Ответы от Оли Гогаладзе @pravda_pro_finansy · 36,520 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Олюшка и крипта l pro.finansy @investiruy_ru · 45,825 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
PRO.FINANSY @profinansy_post · 62,640 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Дивиденды | pro.finansy @div_profinansy · 74,853 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Академия PRO.FINANSY @profinansy_academy · 83,183 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Школа финансовой грамотности | pro.finansy @invest_profinansy · 37,436 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Акции с Ольгой Гогаладзе l pro.finansy @profinansy_equity · 52,337 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Облигации | pro.finansy @obligaciipr · 57,259 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Агрегатор инвест идей | pro.finansy @investforbegginers · 57,912 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Финсоветы | pro.finansy @finhacker_profinansy · 21,198 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Ирина Аргентова | Pro финансы @finance_for_life · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
Куда инвестирует Ольга Гогаладзе | pro.finansy @alwaysbemoney · 31,338 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Марафон по финансовой грамотности | pro.finansy @igra_profinansy · 45,978 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Мужской взгляд на деньги | pro.finansy @investnews_profinansy · 21,624 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 September 2026
Светлана Шишкина. Как жить лучше @sveta_economy · 31,145 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Записки юной пенсионерки @kiltauolgafinance · 54,269 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Амагырова про ИИ @taobao_ninja · 40,947 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 6 September 2026
Ksenia_finance @ksenia_finance · 75,916 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе @profinansy · 575,441 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Дмитрий Толстяков | Инвестиции и жизнь @dmitrytolstyakov · 34,510 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Школа безопасных инвестиций @finraonline · 44,002 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pro.news | новости про деньги” (@profinansy_news), 85,876 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profinansy_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.