Channel
@conflictwatchHQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,233subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002056347731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @conflictwatchHQ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/conflictwatchHQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,233 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,219 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,219 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,592 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🚨 If You Only Speak When It Fits Your Agenda, You're Not Defending Human Rights. You're Defending a Narrative. SILENT NOW❓ For years, these self-proclaimed "Kashmir advocacy" groups campaigned relentlessly on Kashmir. But as protests, fatalities, detentions, and communication restrictions are reported in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, where are their voices now? Selective outrage destroys credibility. Human rights can…
🚨 LOOK BEYOND THE PROPAGANDA Kashmir's Dividing Line Reveals Two Very Different Political Realities. #TransformingKashmir #Kashmir @conflictwatchHQ
🚨 Tousef Ahmad Dar Arrested in Pulwama with Hand Grenade, Anti-National Posters; Suspected Terror Plot Foiled Authorities foiled a suspected terror conspiracy in Pulwama, Jammu & Kashmir, after arresting a suspect during a checkpoint operation and recovering explosive material and propaganda items. Recovered: ▪️ 1 hand grenade ▪️ 3 anti-national posters ▪️ 1 mobile phone Arrested: ▪️ Tousef Ahmad Dar, resident of …
🚨 Terrorist as Mediator? Intelligence Inputs Suggest Jaish-e-Mohammed Is Facilitating Backchannel Contacts Between Islamabad and Rawalakot. @NIA_India @HMOIndia According to intelligence inputs, a delegation from Islamabad under the banner of the "Aman Jirga" has arrived in Rawalakot, Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) and held discussions with core members of the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC). ▪️ I…
Rawalpindi Students Support PoJK Protesters — Met with Batons and Mass Arrests Kashmiri students peacefully gathered outside the Press Club to back PoJK protesters. Police response: dragged into vans, baton charges and mass arrests. The crackdown has spilled over from PoJK into the capital — targeting students and dissenters at home. @kashmirconflictstories
🚨 'A Stain on Humanity': Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind Chief Criticises India's Alleged Arms Exports to Israel Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind President Maulana Mahmood Asad Madani has criticised India's alleged arms exports to Israel, describing them as "a stain on humanity and India's moral values." ▪️ Referring to a recent Amnesty International report, Madani urged the Indian government to halt military exports to Israel and called f…
🚨 LeT Terrorist Reveals 30+ Members Killed by UNKNOWN GUNMEN LeT terrorist Rizwan Hanif publicly claimed that the outfit has lost more than 30 members, who were killed by unidentified gunmen, in Peshawar, Karachi, Rawalpindi, Rawalakot, and Muzaffarabad over the past 3–4 years. He alleged that the attackers were "Indian agents.” @conflictwatchHQ
🕯️ Two Young Men Left Chhattisgarh to Earn a Living. Terrorists Took Their Lives in Kulgam. Deepak Ratre (24) and Bhupendra Bhaina (28), two migrant labourers from Chhattisgarh, were killed in the terrorist attack in Kulgam, Jammu & Kashmir, while working at a brick kiln. Key Highlights: ▪️ The attack took place in the Kelam area of Kulgam on Friday evening, where terrorists opened fire on the two labourers. ▪️ De…
🚨 Security Forces Arrest OGW in Baramulla, Recover MP-5 Type Pistol & Ammunition Key Highlights: ▪️ The operation was carried out jointly by the Indian Army's 46 Rashtriya Rifles, SOG Baramulla, 53 Battalion CRPF, and 112 Battalion BSF at Zandfaran–Goriwan Crossing in Narwav. ▪️ Officials said the suspect attempted to flee after spotting the joint checkpoint but was chased and apprehended. ▪️ The arrested individua…
Pakistan slipping into economic decline as investors look elsewhere — Maulana Fazlur Rehman “From an economic perspective, Pak is the only country in the region that is moving rapidly towards decline. Global confidence in Pakistan has been lost, and no country is ready to invest in Pakistan. Pakistan's PM and Army Chief both visited China to encourage investment in Pakistan. But China also completely refused any k…
Protesters in Muzaffarabad Declare “Section Cricket” — Security Forces Retreat, Section 144 Lifted In Muzaffarabad, capital of Pakistan‑occupied Kashmir, protesters forced security forces to pull back and Section 144 was lifted — replacing it with a spontaneous "Section Cricket." Young demonstrators keep protesting while playing cricket in the streets. @conflictwatchHQ
🚨 Kulgam Terror Attack Death Toll Rises to Two as Second Injured Labourer Succumbs The death toll in the Kulgam terror attack has risen to two after the second critically injured non-local labourersuccumbed to his injuries during treatment on Saturday. The terrorist attack took place on Friday evening in the Kilam area of south Kashmir's Kulgam district, where two labourers from outside Jammu and Kashmir were tar…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @conflictwatchHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 632,141 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@conflictwatchHQ named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kashmir Conflict Stories” (@conflictwatchHQ), 1,233 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conflictwatchHQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.