Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kashmir Disinfo Lab

Channel

Kashmir Disinfo Lab

@kashmirdisinfolab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

917subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979516914
TypeChannel
Username@kashmirdisinfolab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kashmirdisinfolab

Growth

9099179137 August 2026 — 909 subscribers7 August 2026 — 910 subscribers8 August 2026 — 910 subscribers14 August 2026 — 917 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 908–918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:08917+7
8 Aug 2026, 01:02910no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:33910+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:35909first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.0%
avg views ÷ 917 subscribers
Avg views / post
660
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,559
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 21s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

"Article 370 Was Already Dead’In 1975 (Indira–Sheikh Accord) Ex-IB & RAW Chief A.S. Dulat's Remarks Reignite Kashmir Debate Former RAW Chief A.S. Dulat's latest India-Pakistan peace appeal has revived debate over his controversial legacy. Critics cite his claim that Article 370 had effectively ended in 1975, his close engagement with former ISI chief Asad Durrani—including co-authoring a book and reportedly helping

6 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC131 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Huge congrats to Owais Yaqoob — making New India and New Kashmir proud! Owais Yaqoob wins gold in Bulgaria! 🇮🇳 🏆 A proud moment for India and for Kashmir — hard work, talent, and resilience shine on the global stage. Salute to our brother for putting us on the map. This is New India, this is New Kashmir. @kashmirdisinfolab

5 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

No network, just stories — the dhaba owner on the Army The dhaba owner wiped his hands, nodded toward the winding pass and said, “Up there the Army keeps us safe — road clearances at dawn, stranded riders helped without fuss, and the men who drop rations when weather traps us. According to him :- They never ask for thanks, just get on with the job.” My phone had no network, but his words — about quiet duty, quick

5 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC154 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

𝗝𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘂 & 𝗞𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗶𝗿 𝘃𝘀 “𝗔𝘇𝗮𝗱” 𝗞𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗶𝗿: 𝗔 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 In J&K people vote openly, parties campaign, and turnout reflects real choice. In Pakistan‑Occupied Jammu And Kashmir (PoJK) elections are marred by blocked roads, party boycotts and low turnout — yet Islamabad still paints them as “free” and “azad.” @kashmirdisinfolab

5 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🇮🇳 Respect for the Tricolour Is Non-Negotiable @MehboobaMufti In visuals from protest in Srinagar, PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti appears to be holding the Indian Tricolour upside down while describing August 5 as a "black day". If the National Flag is going to be used as part of a political protest, the minimum expectation is to display it correctly and with due respect. The optics have sparked criticism, with many qu

5 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🇮🇳 Meet Owais Yaqoob: The MMA Fighter from Kashmir Making India Proud Indian MMA fighter Owais Yaqoob, who recently defeated Delyan Georgiev, received a warm welcome on returning to his native village in Pulwama, Jammu & Kashmir. Reflecting on his victory, Owais said the win was a huge emotional relief after carrying the weight of expectations from the Indian MMA community. "It felt as if I had been trapped in a j

4 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC160 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Journalists report widespread boycott, fear after deadly POK protests Journalists on the ground in Muzaffarabad say most people boycotted the POK polls after protests since June left 50+ dead. Reporters witnessed violent clashes in Lower Plate and Central Plate; most residents were too scared to speak on record @kashmirdisinfolab

2 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Pakistan's Peace Image Abroad, Crackdown at Home Report Says Double Standards Exposed Key Points: ▪️ The report claims peaceful demonstrations in PoJK have been met with live fire, communications blackouts, movement restrictions, and arrests. ▪️ It cites remarks attributed to Pakistan Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, who reportedly ruled out dialogue with protesters and referred to them as being in the "same catego

1 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC241 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔹 MP Nadia Whittome urged Pakistan to end the communications blackout and halt the reported violence against protesters. 🔹 MP Liam Byrne called the reports of live fire on peaceful protesters "deeply alarming" and demanded urgent engagement with the Pakistan High Commission and the UK Foreign Office. @kashmirdisinfolab

1 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 UK MPs Raise Alarm Over Reported Violence in PoK, Urge Pakistan to End Crackdown More than 50 British parliamentarians have written to the UK Foreign Secretary, expressing concern over the reported escalation of violence in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Key Highlights: 🔹 APPG on Kashmir Chair Imran Hussain MP said the MPs were concerned by reports of live fire, civilian deaths, injuries, movement restrictions,

31 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Reports from Kotli, Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoJK), claim that Pakistani Rangers and Frontier Corps personnel opened fire during protests involving women demonstrators. Local sources allege several people were killed or injured. @kashmirdisinfolab

30 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

PoJK: Zahid Amin Kashif has alleged that "there is no government left in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir anymore—only bullets and batons exist.” @kashmirdisinfolab

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kashmirdisinfolab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 928,749 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SSC Railway UP Police PET UPSC NDA CDS Airforce Police Math & Reasoning Quiz ™️
@UP_Police_Constable_Math_Exam · 189,930
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kashmir Disinfo Lab” (@kashmirdisinfolab), 917 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashmirdisinfolab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.