Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PGurus

@pgurus1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,759subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001336793628
TypeChannel
Username@pgurus1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pgurus1

Growth

3,7593,7673,7637 August 2026 — 3,767 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,767 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,762 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,759 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,758–3,768 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:363,759-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:073,762-5
7 Aug 2026, 11:463,767no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:373,767first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.79%
avg views ÷ 3,759 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held26 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,638
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 26 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7458.7%
👍3729.4%
🔥1411.1%
👏10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ISI-Linked JeM Plot to Create Mayhem at Jantar Mantar Busted! What Happened? via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcbl7CSe2uo

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC148 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Has Meta Really Changed? What CJP’s Instagram Stats Reveal via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbIbOU29Nl4

3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FCRA Bill 2026: Who Should Influence India’s Democracy - Indian Voters or Foreign Donors? via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP89sF3E6ZU

3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC174 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Did Zuckerberg Apologize or Just Express Regret? What Meta Promised India via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVSuQ7sCbEo

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Iran-US Oman Deal: What It REALLY Means & What Trump Has Built Around It... via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvNjvicHNXY

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC196 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

On the Backfoot? Send a Legal Notice! ‘Fallen, But No Mud on My Moustache’ via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSSPKJh8joE

3

7 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC259 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Fake votes got Mamdani elected? Dems-MB links? Will this help Trump in Midterms? • #GoodMorningIndia via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbXx5t5PknA

👍32

7 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC263 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

FCRA 2.0 Affects All—Why Is Only One Minority Community Crying Foul? • Savio Rodrigues via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2vxwm0PHs8

6👍1

6 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC259 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

633,000 Maricopa Voter Files Hacked Before 2020 Election - Was the Result Affected? via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB-CW5M183o

👍21

6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC258 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Will Trump Lose Congress in November Midterms - or Can He Still Pull It Off? • #GoodMorningIndia via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA-8OAwKWlI

👍21

6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC252 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

CJP Implodes? Saurav Das's veneer drops; Faces Questions Over ₹1–2L GK Rent & other revelations via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvBwCOVLFbE

👍42

6 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The New Deal Isn’t Between US & Iran! So Where Does That Leave America? • #GoodGenerals via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5alTvZWJW8I

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @pgurus1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MyGov Newsdesk
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 384,487
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PGurus” (@pgurus1), 3,759 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgurus1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.