Channel
@Panahian_ir
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
65,187subscribers
-138 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001002797175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Panahian_ir |
| Description | کانال رسمی نشر آثار علیرضا پناهیان کانال صوتی (آرشیو سخنرانیها) @Panahian_mp3 سایت panahian.ir |
| Created | 28 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Panahian_ir |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 65,187 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 65,208 | -18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 65,226 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 65,242 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 65,260 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 65,284 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 65,297 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 65,306 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 65,323 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 65,325 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 65,325 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (31 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 82,215 |
| Reactions total | 1,147 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,107 reactions across 34 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,107 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Panahian_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
در قسمت هفتم از مبحث «جامعه مهدوی» به موضوعی پرداختیم که کمتر در مسئله ظهور به آن توجه شده است: خلأ تئوریک در جهان تا زمانی که جهان در حوزه حکمرانی و سبک زندگی با یک خلأ تئوریک مواجه نشود، احتمالاً احساس نیاز جدی به یک الگوی جدید برای حکمرانی نخواهد کرد. در این قسمت، نسبت «خلأ تئوریک» با ضرورت ظهور و شکلگیری جامعه مهدوی را بررسی میکنیم. #جامعه_مهدوی #حکمرانی #پناهیان @Panahian_ir
❤11
در قسمت ششم از سلسله جلسات «جامعه مهدوی» به یک تصور غلط و رایج از دین پرداختیم؛ این تصور که دین صرفاً امری معنوی است و با زندگی روزمره، نیازها و مسائل واقعی انسان نسبتی ندارد. در حالیکه چنین نگاهی به دین، نهتنها با حقیقت دین سازگار نیست، بلکه از اساس نگاهی غیرعقلانی است. در این قسمت، این تصور غلط را بررسی کردهایم. #جامعه_مهدوی #مهدویت #پناهیان @Panahian_ir
❤19
🔻پیش ثبت نام دبیرستان پسرانه دارالحکمه🔺️ متناسب با اقتضائات تربیت نوجوانِ امروز. 🧠🔥 ❌ نه به انفعال در برابر جهان مدرن و بیگانه ❌ نه به عصیان علیه سنت و فرهنگ خودی ✅ مسئولیتپذیرِ آگاه و رهبری خردمند 🌍⚡توانمند برای ساختن تمدن نوین جهانی اینجا نوجوان قرار نیست: ⭐ اسیر نظام اداری و غیر مستقل بار بیاید ➡️ بلکه خود با مهارتهای زندگی جمعی برای اداره جامعه تربیت میشود. 📱 نه مصرفکنندهی رسانه 🎥 بلکه صاحب رسانه 🛑 نه صرفا …
❤13
📌 مراسم عزاداری ایام پایانی ماه صفر و اربعین رهبر شهید با سخنرانی استاد علیرضا پناهیان 🗓 پنجشنبه ۲۲ مرداد | حوالی ساعت ۱۶ 📍مشهد، بلوار سجاد، ابتدای بلوار اخوان ثالث #برنامه_سخنرانی @Panahian_ir
❤27
🏴 شهادت حجّتِ قاطع ربّانی، مظهر رأفت الهی و سلطان سریرِ کرامت، حضرت علی بن موسی الرضا(ع) تسلیت و تعزیت باد @Panahian_ir
❤33
در قسمت پنجم از مبحث «جامعه مهدوی» به یک سؤال مهم پرداختیم: چه عاملی تعیینکنندهترین عامل در پاسخ به این سؤال است که آیا دوباره جنگ خواهد شد یا خیر؟ پاسخ به این سؤال، بحثی مبسوط و قابل تأمل است. از شما علاقهمندان دعوت میکنیم برای شنیدن پاسخ کامل این سؤال و مباحث مطرحشده، به صوت کامل جلسه دوم «جامعه مهدوی» مراجعه فرمایید. 👈 صوت کامل جلسه دوم #جامعه_مهدوی #جنگ #پناهیان @Panahian_ir
❤22
❗️وقتی مردم تحلیل سیاسی ندارند 🔻بیانات رهبر شهید - ۱۳۷۲/۰۸/۱۲ @Panahian_ir
❤41
📣 اطلاعیه ثبت نام 📣 🔹️ثبت نام و پذیرش حوزه علمیه دارالحکمه 🔸ویژه دانشجویان و فارغ التحصیلان 🔹️تحت اشراف استاد علیرضا پناهیان 🔻 جهت ثبت نام فرم زیر را تکمیل کنید: https://survey.porsline.ir/s/2p9lSLFu 🔰 دارالحکمه | دانشگاهیان ✅ @darolhekmahuni
❤21
ما اصلاً برای چه میخواهیم به جامعهی مهدوی برسیم؟! مگر جامعهی مهدوی چه ویژگیای دارد که میتواند آرزوی ما باشد؟! در قسمت چهارم از مبحث «جامعهی مهدوی» به خلاصهای از این موارد اشاره کردهایم پیشنهاد میکنیم علاقهمندان به موضوع صوت کامل جلسات را از کانال @Panahian_mp3 بشنوند #مهدویت #انتظار #جامعه_مهدوی @Panahian_ir
❤28
در قسمت سوم از مبحث «جامعه مهدوی»، یک نمونه از انسان منتظر را میشناسیم؛ انسانی معصوم که میتواند الگوی ما برای فهم ویژگیهای یک منتظر واقعی باشد. منتظر امام زمان(عج) چگونه زندگی میکند و چه ویژگیهایی دارد؟ #جامعه_مهدوی #انتظار #مهدویت @Panahian_ir
❤31
📌 اطلاعیه تمامی کمکهای مالی مورد تأیید استاد پناهیان، صرفاً از طریق این کانال اطلاعرسانی خواهد شد. هرگونه درخواست کمک مالی با نام استاد پناهیان که خارج از کانال رسمی منتشر شود، فاقد وجاهت قانونی بوده و با متخلفان برخورد و موضوع از طریق مراجع قانونی پیگیری خواهد شد. @Panahian_ir
❤36
📖 «روشنای آینده» مجموعهای از بیانات رهبر شهید ما درباره جامعه مهدوی و مقدمات ظهور حضرت ولیعصر(عج) است. در این کتاب، نکاتی شاذ، جذاب و کمتر شنیدهشده درباره الزامات و مقدمات ظهور و ویژگیهای جامعهای که باید مهیای ظهور باشد، مطرح شده است. در این کلیپ، چند خطی از این نکات را با هم مرور میکنیم؛ نکاتی که شاید تصویر ما از «انتظار» و «جامعه مهدوی» را دقیقتر کند. #روشنای_آینده #جامعه_مهدوی #مهدویت @Panahian_ir
❤30
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Panahian_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 4,074 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 109 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علیرضا پناهیان” (@Panahian_ir), 65,187 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Panahian_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.