Channel
@Panahian_ir
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
64,779subscribers
-546 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001002797175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Panahian_ir |
| Description | کانال رسمی نشر آثار علیرضا پناهیان کانال صوتی (آرشیو سخنرانیها) @Panahian_mp3 سایت panahian.ir |
| Created | 28 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Panahian_ir |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 64,779 | -135 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 64,914 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 64,919 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 64,933 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 64,944 | -36 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 64,980 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 65,000 | -27 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 65,027 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:26 | 65,034 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 65,047 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 65,058 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 65,072 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 65,087 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 65,102 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 65,114 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 65,120 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 65,116 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 65,127 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 65,135 | -20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 65,155 | first reading |
112 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 112 (31 July 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 142,378 |
| Reactions total | 2,255 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,375 reactions across 111 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,375 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Panahian_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 112 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
امام زمان(عج) دوستشان داشت که اینقدر عزیز شدند… حالا میان این همه غمِ غربت و فراق، یک سؤال از خودمان بپرسیم: ما چقدر برای امام زمانمان عزیزیم؟ او چقدر ما را دوست دارد؟ و چقدر زندگیمان شبیه کسی است که امامش دوستش دارد؟ @Panahian_ir
❤15
📺 گفتگوی تلویزیونی استاد علیرضا پناهیان 🗓 چهارشنبه ۸ مهر | ساعت ۱۹:۳۰ 👈 پخش از شبکه یک سیما: telewebion.net/live/tv1 #برنامه_سخنرانی @Panahian_ir
❤5
بگذار از بغضی برایتان بگویم که اشک نه؛ خون شد در فراق یاران… و بگذار از غربت و فراقمان در این روزگار بگویم؛ از درد می شود روی درد، تا امید بروید از این. چنانکه داغ اباعبدالله(ع) که تنها هرگز سرد نشد؛ که خون شد در رگهای ما، برای برخاستن، برای ادامه دادن، برای حرکت رو به آینده. @Panahian_ir
❤32
ما فکر میکنیم ولایتمداری یعنی فقط اطاعت، اما یکبار معنای ولایتمداری را از زبان سید حسن نصرالله بشنویم #سیدحسن_نصرالله @Panahian_ir
❤46
❗️سکوت، خیانت است! #سیدحسن_نصرالله @Panahian_ir
❤27
❗️دینِ ما، دینِ جامعِ اضداد است؛ اگر چنین نبود، دینداری آسانتر میشد. از یکسو فرمان دادهاند که باید از ولیّامر خویش دفاع کنیم، و از سوی دیگر سفارش کردهاند که باید بصیر باشیم و اهلِ تشخیصِ تکلیف، تا در هر لحظه بتوانیم تکلیفِ خود را تشخیص دهیم 📍دانشگاه امیرکبیر 🗓 ۲۱ مهرماه ۱۴۰۴ #پناهیان #بصیرت #ولایت #تکلیف #ولایت_فقیه #بصیرت_انقلابی #دین #ایمان #ولایتمداری #تشخیص_تکلیف #حکمت #تفکر #دینداری #جامع_اضداد @Panah…
❤31
از دل جزوهی «چگونه احساس ارزشمندی کنم؟» 📚 گروه تخصصی پناهیان روانشناسی، جزوهای رو تهیه و تنظیم کرده 📽️ بر اساس سخنان استاد علیرضا پناهیان 📑 و بهرهگیری از آخرین یافتههای روانشناسی 📝 کهنکاتی کاربردی و عملی ♥️ برای تقویت حس ارزشمندی در اختیارتون قرار میده 👈 تهیه جزوه: @F_monshi_a @A_monshi_f ۰۹۰۰۳۱۳۹۰۴۰ ۰۹۱۹۳۶۱۹۶۸۹ @Panahian_ir
❤14
استاد علیرضا پناهیان: اغلب کارشناسان دنیا میگویند جنگ آمریکا با ایران طولانی نخواهد شد، اما تنها یک آدم در دنیا گفته که جنگ ۲۰ سال طول میکشد. این حرف که میگوید از مردم بپرسید راضی هستند جنگ ۲۰ سال طول بکشد، فریب است؛ طوری موضوع را مطرح میکند که جوابش از پیش مشخص باشد و بعد میگوید دربارۀ آن رفراندوم برگزار کنیم. خب معلوم است همه میگویند نه. طوری میگوید که انگار ما خودمان وارد جنگ شدهایم، نه اینکه به ما حمله …
❤100
زندگی بدون دشمن را میشود تصور کرد؟ یک لحظه تصور کنید در بهشت هستید؛ خدا شما را اشرف مخلوقات قرار داده است. آنجا دیگر حتماً دشمنی ندارید! پس ابلیس در بهشت چه میکند؟ آدم و حوا چگونه اغوا میشوند؟ واقعیت این است؛ از همان لحظه خلقت، انسان دشمن داشت. انگار قرار است زندگی در میان مبارزه معنا پیدا کند. #مبارزه #دشمن_شناسی @Panahian_ir
❤47
لذتِ فهمیدن، یکی از بزرگترین لذتهای دنیاست. شاید برای همین است که طلبههای ما در حوزههای علمیه، سالهای جوانیشان را پای درس و بحث میگذارند؛ چون کسی که یکبار طعمِ «فهمیدن» و لذتِ «تفقّه» را چشیده باشد، میداند بعضی لذتها را نمیشود با هیچ لذت دیگری عوض کرد. @Panahian_ir
❤69
🚩 سخنرانی استاد علیرضا پناهیان در اجتماع مردمی 🗓 پنجشنبه ۲ مهر | حوالی ۱۹:۳۰ 📍خانیآباد نو، میدان ابن سینا #برنامه_سخنرانی @Panahian_ir
❤29
استاد علیرضا پناهیان: اراجیف ترامپ هیچ ارزش رسانهای نداشت چه رسد به اینکه بخواهد ماندگار بشود. اما بیانات پزشکیان تاریخی بود و جهان را تحتتأثیر فریاد مقاومتِ مردم ایران قرار خواهد داد. تا باد چنین بادا. @Panahian_ir
❤142
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @Panahian_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Panahian_ir edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 75 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 112 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علیرضا پناهیان” (@Panahian_ir), 64,779 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Panahian_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.