Channel
@twtenghelabi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
256,391subscribers
-3,855 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001481507887 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twtenghelabi |
| Created | 12 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twtenghelabi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 256,391 | -532 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 256,923 | -395 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 257,318 | -541 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 257,859 | -338 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 258,197 | -355 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 258,552 | -411 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 258,963 | -546 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 259,509 | -416 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 259,925 | -240 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 260,165 | -81 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 260,246 | first reading |
201 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 201 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 411,352 |
| Reactions total | 13,930 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,734 reactions across 182 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,064 | 39.8% | |
| ❤ | 2,548 | 20.0% | |
| 😡 | 1,395 | 11.0% | |
| 👏 | 1,180 | 9.27% | |
| 😁 | 809 | 6.35% | |
| 💔 | 361 | 2.83% | |
| 😍 | 357 | 2.80% | |
| 🤮 | 313 | 2.46% | |
| 😭 | 265 | 2.08% | |
| 😢 | 227 | 1.78% | |
| 👎 | 151 | 1.19% | |
| 😱 | 64 | 0.503% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 201 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,930reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 201 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چیشد پس، تو که تا دیروز میگفتی ایران یه ماه بیشتر دووم نمیاره!!! تا وقتی از عنترنشنال پول میگرفت همش از قدرت (البته پوشالیِ) ۱مریکا و ۱سر۱ئیل میگفت، حالا که پولشو قطع کرده حرفاشو عوض کرد😄 🗣 حسنا رفیعی @twtenghelabi
😁6👍3
بعد از جنگ با آمریکا، مردم دنیا اینجوری ایران و جوونای نخبهی ایرانی رو تحویل میگیرن: 🗣 علی رحیمی @twtenghelabi
❤16
تصویری از خلبان شهید حسین لشگری، مردی که سال 77 پس از 18 سال اسارت به هنگام آزادی، چنان با صلابت قدم برمیداشت گویی بعثیها اسیر او بودند 🗣 از تبار زاگرس🌳 @twtenghelabi
❤66😭5👏1
کشاورزهای هلند ریختن وسط شهر و تظاهرات راهانداختن؛ چرا بیبیسی و اینترنشنال به فکر اونا نیستن؟ جواب شکم گرسنه مردم روتردام و آمستردام رو کی میده؟ 🗣 hasan esfandiari @twtenghelabi
👍20
گروهی از دختران با پوشش عجیب و نامناسب همراه با علائم شیطان پرستی به صورت روزانه راهپیمایی ترویج بی بند و باری راه می اندازند و هیچ مجموعه امنیتی و قضایی با آنها کاری ندارد. هیس!!!🤫 چیزی نگو وحدت و انسجام به هم میخوره ولی بیایین بنزین رو گران کنیم چیزی نمیشه... 🗣 آقا محمد @twtenghelabi
😡58🤮16❤2😁2
امروز ۲۵ مرداد ۷۳مین سالروز #اولین_فرار محمدرضا پهلویه... گفتم بگم یادتون نره یه وقت! 🗣 محمدعلی جابری @twtenghelabi
👏25😁16👍2
ببینید: ویدیویی که یک ملوان منتشر کرده و وایرال شده، وضعیت بسیار کثیف سرویسهای بهداشتی در ناوی را نشان میدهد که گفته میشود ناو هواپیمابر USS Abraham Lincoln است. دوشهای لکگرفته، کفهای چرک و توالتهای گرفته. ملوان هم با کنایه میگوید: بعد میگن برو به نیروی دریایی ملحق شو، نه؟ https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/2088788608463319140/video/1 🗣 آرش یوسفی -ARASH @twtenghelabi
🤮4😁1
دیده شده در بازار نجف... 🗣 فاطمه خانوم @twtenghelabi
❤93😍9🤮3👍2😭1
بچه رو میبریم پارک بازی کنه این پدرسگ ها و ننه سگ ها دلبندانشون رو از تاب و سرسره پیاده نمیکنن که دو دقیقه فرزند آدمیزادها هم بازی کنن. سگ تاب و سرسره چه میفهمه؟ ببرش پارک جنگلی براش چوب پرت کن 🗣 پریمهربون☫🎒 @twtenghelabi
👏63👍24❤1😢1
کشف محموله سنگین سلاح جنگی در کشور فرمانده مرزبانی فراجا: 🔹 مرزبانان مستقر در مرزهای کشور طی چند عملیات رزمی و غافلگیرکننده در یک هفته گذشته موفق شدند این محمولهها را قبل از ورود به کشور کشف و ضبط کنند. 🔹 در این عملیاتها در مجموع ۴۹ قبضه سلاح شامل ۱۹ قبضه سلاح جنگی و ۳۰ قبضه سلاح شکاری به همراه مقادیر قابل توجهی مهمات مربوطه کشف شد. 🔹در جریان این عملیاتها، ضمن انهدام باندهای قاچاق سلاح، ۵ نفر از قاچاقچیان دستگی…
😡14👏6❤1
فاجعهای بیش از تهاجم فرهنگی در حال قورت دادن جامعهی ایران است. استقبال دختران نوجوان از میکاپآرتیست و سلمانیهای مردانه و تغییر ظاهربه چهرهای اگزجره برگرفته از نقشهای تخیلی خاص، وانتشار آن در فضای مجازی برای همگان، چیزی جز بحران هویت و بیقیدی خانواده، نیست. 🗣 Fatemeh Mohammadi | فاطمه محمدی @twtenghelabi
👍50😡10❤2🤮2
*سرائیل یه ویدیو از سربازاش منتشر کرده که توش یه شهر کامل رو تو جنوب لبنا*ن منف•جر میکنن. نه فقط اهداف نظا•می؛ خونههای مردم و غیرنظا•میها. یه شهر کامل از روی نقشه محو شده و بعد با افتخار این ویدیو رو منتشر کردن. 🗣 محدثه مختاری @twtenghelabi
😡45😭3😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 201 posts we hold for @twtenghelabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 81,068 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توییتر انقلابی - ایکس” (@twtenghelabi), 256,391 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twtenghelabi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.