ما در "اخ فی الله" از #زندگی_سگی_اسرائیلیها میگوییم و #حقیقت_اسرائیل را فاش میکنیم
ما #دردفلسطین داریم
@akhonfellahinarabic أخفيالله بالعربي
تماس با ما:
@akhonfellah
اخباری که بالای آنها تصویر یا ویدیوی منبع خبر هست از منابع عبری است
Created
18 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,547–39,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 15:36
39,562
-28
13 Aug 2026, 03:45
39,590
+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:42
39,589
-17
11 Aug 2026, 06:31
39,606
-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:07
39,608
-4
9 Aug 2026, 08:32
39,612
-15
8 Aug 2026, 07:25
39,627
-21
7 Aug 2026, 09:20
39,648
-13
6 Aug 2026, 06:10
39,661
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:22
39,661
first reading
Engagement
350 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 39,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
609
350 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
350
of 350 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 293 of 350 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
350 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
212,976
Reactions total
2,793
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈130,000
Videos
≈75,400
Links
≈11,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 42m
Average length
1m 38s
Measured directly from 100 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,676 reactions across 268 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
887
33.1%
🤬
662
24.7%
🔥
516
19.3%
👍
491
18.3%
💔
54
2.02%
🫡
48
1.79%
😢
6
0.224%
🙏
5
0.187%
😱
4
0.149%
😭
3
0.112%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 350 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,793reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 350 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در پی حملات اخیر اسقاطیل در لبنان، حزبالله بیانیهای صادر کرد و نوشت: «مقامات لبنانی باید این تجاوز را متوقف کنند و از اصرار خود بر انجام مذاکرات مستقیم و تحقیرآمیز و ارائه امتیازات رایگان به دشمن، با وجود تمام جنایتها و حملاتی که انجام میدهد، دست بردارند.»
این سازمان همچنین تهدید کرد که به حملات پاسخ خواهد داد: «دشمن اسقاطیلی باید درک کند که تجاوزها، تخلفات و تلاشهایش برای تحمیل عمل انجامشده نمیتواند ادامه یا…
بیانیه حزبالله:
لبنانیها بامداد امروز با تشدید تجاوز و کشتار وحشیانهای از خواب بیدار شدند که دشمن جنایتکار صهیونیستی علیه غیرنظامیان بیدفاع در جنوب مرتکب شد؛ با هدف قرار دادن خانهای در حومه شهرک جنوبی انصار و ساختمانی در دیر الزهرانی که به شهادت 11 نفر، از جمله کودکان و زنان، و مجروح شدن 12 نفر منجر شد. این جنایتی آشکار است که به کارنامه مملو از کشتارها، جنایتها، ریختن خون لبنانیها، منفجر کردن خانههای آنان، …
بيان صادر عن حزب الله:
استيقظ اللبنانيون فجر اليوم على وقع تصعيد عدواني ومجزرة وحشية ارتكبها العدو الصهيوني المجرم بحق المدنيين الآمنين في الجنوب، من خلال استهداف منزل في أطراف بلدة أنصار الجنوبية ومبنى في دير الزهراني، ما أدى إلى ارتقاء إحدى عشر شهيدًا من بينهم أطفال ونساء وسقوط اثني عشر جريحًا، في جريمة موصوفة تضاف إلى سجل العدو الحافل بالمجازر والجرائم وسفك دماء اللبنانيين وتفجير منازلهم وجرف حقولهم ومحو معالم قر…
رئیس قوه قضائیه ایران، غلامحسین اژهای: «ما به ترامپ و حامیانش ثابت کردیم که تنگه هرمز بخش جداییناپذیر از آبهای سرزمینی و مرزهای ایران است و هرگونه تجاوز در آنجا با نابودی هر نیرویی پاسخ داده خواهد شد. توهمات و دروغهای رئیسجمهور آمریکا درباره تنگه هرمز، خیالپردازیهای اوست.»
وزارت اطلاعات ایران بیانیهای خطاب به دولت فرانسه منتشر کرد و به این کشور درباره مداخله دیپلماتها در امور داخلی ایران هشدار داد. در این بیانیه آمده است که تهران اجازه مداخله غیرقانونی از سوی مهمانان دیپلماتیک خود را نخواهد داد و اگر این اقدام تکرار شود، با افراد مذکور برخورد متناسب خواهد کرد.
انور قرقاش، مشاور رئیس امارات: «حملات مکرر به نفتکشهای ADNOC، امارات متحده عربی را از اتخاذ سیاستی متوازن و محتاطانه که بر سه رکن بازدارندگی، دیپلماسی و پایبندی به قوانین بینالمللی استوار است، منصرف نخواهد کرد.
ما مطابق با قوانین بینالمللی، حقوق خود برای آزادی کشتیرانی و استفاده از تنگه هرمز را حفظ خواهیم کرد و ضمن ادامه مسیر گفتوگو و اولویت دادن به گزینههای دیپلماتیک، از حاکمیت و منافع خود دفاع خواهیم کرد.
ما…
وزارت خارجه ایران: «مذاکرات با عمان طی سه هفته گذشته مثبت بوده و در آن پیشرفتهایی حاصل شده است. با وجود موانعی که واشنگتن ایجاد کرده، با عمان درباره نقشه کشتیرانی به توافق رسیدهایم. مذاکرات با عمان درباره برخی نکات همچنان ادامه دارد.
برای بازگرداندن کشتیرانی عادی در تنگه هرمز، باید اقدامات و تهدیدهای آمریکا و محاصره دریایی متوقف شود.»
رئیس پارلمان ایران، محمدباقر قالیباف: «من با رزمندگان در جبهههای مقاومت در لبنان در ارتباط هستم.»
«دو کشتاری که اسقاطیل در روستاهای انصار و دیرالزهرانی مرتکب شد، ادامه جنگ نابودی در جنوب است. اسقاطیل همه توافقها، قوانین و تلاشها برای پایان دادن به جنگ و تنش در لبنان و منطقه را نادیده میگیرد.»
رئیسجمهور لبنان، جوزف عون، حملات اسقاطیل به جنوب لبنان را که به کشتهشدن یک خانواده کامل در روستای «الانصار» منجر شد، محکوم کرد. عون این حملات را نقض توافق چارچوب، فعالیت کمیته هماهنگی نظامی و همچنین قوانین بینالمللی الزامآور برای حفاظت از غیرنظامیان توصیف کرد.
عون افزود که این حملات، پیامی آشکار علیه روند مذاکرات و تلاشهای آمریکا برای اجرای توافق است.
فرمانده کمیته جستوجوی مفقودان در ستاد کل نیروهای ایران، باقرزاده: «سه خلبان ایرانی پس از آنکه جنگندههای سوخو-24 آنها در جریان حملات ماه مارس گذشته سقوط کرد، زنده به دست نیروهای قطری اسیر شدند. جواد صالحی، عبدالمجید دشتیان و عمران بهروشیان شش ماه است که در اسارت نیروهای قطری به سر میبرند.»
«دولت قطر تاکنون مانع از ملاقات، مصاحبه یا برقراری ارتباط آنها با اعضای خانوادهشان و مقامهای رسمی مسئول پیگیری این موضوع شده…
❤6😢3😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 350 posts we hold for @mhrezaa2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 27,715 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
توییتر انقلابی - ایکس @twtenghelabi · 256,923 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
بیداری ملت @bidariimelat · 173,648 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
اخبار جنگ / خبر یک خطی @khabar1khatti1400 · 230,827 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
🎬 بیسیمچی مدیا @bisimchimedia · 1,050,798 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
کانال رسمی صابرین نیوز @saberin_ir · 710,134 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 August 2026
Masaf | مؤسسه مصاف @masaf · 190,345 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
افسران جوان جنگ نرم @afsaran_ir · 292,532 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
SNN.ir|خبرگزاری دانشجو @snntv · 121,878 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
اسکواد ایران | Squad Iran @Squad_iran · 118,149 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
نورنیوز @Nournews_ir · 238,238 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار سپاه قدس 🇮🇷 @QODS_COM · 314,110 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
خبرگزاری جمهوری اسلامی - ایرنا @irna_1313 · 144,439 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
خبرگزاری فارس @farsna · 1,833,486 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 August 2026
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ @m_Mahdibaba · 140,083 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
سربازان گمنام @sarbazane_g · 303,201 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
خبرگزاری تسنیم @Tasnimnews · 2,556,660 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 August 2026
🔸کیسان ابوعمره🔸 @mahdaviatsiasi · 176,186 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
◾️کانال اخبار سپاه قدس @sepah_quds · 285,482 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
خبرگزاری مهر @mehrnews · 300,144 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
باشگاه خبرنگاران جوان @yjcnewschannel · 119,181 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
ایسنا @isna94 · 124,805 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
روزپلاس @roozplus_ir · 203,532 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 200,961 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
عصر فردا @asrefarda_ir · 1,174,726 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أخٌفيالله” (@mhrezaa2), 39,562 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mhrezaa2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.