دو کلمه حرف حساب😉 قدرت تخریب ۱۰/۱۰ ه کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
👍75🥰7❤6👎2👏1
Signed ali

Channel
@iran_cityofsun
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,062subscribers
+139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001691168960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iran_cityofsun |
| Description | اخبار و تحلیل های تمدنی ایران و جهان میلاد رضایی جهت حمایت مالی : http://paypal.me/Suncity100 شماره کارت 5892101581893043 IR040150000251070166274471 ادمین: @ir_cityofsun لینک صفحات ما: https://zil.ink/iran_shar https://youtube.com/@shahrekhorshid |
| Created | 1 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iran_cityofsun |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @iran_cityofsun/41463 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC | @twovadeh/3179535 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC | 1.00 | 74 minutes |
| @iran_cityofsun/41464 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC | @twovadeh/3179545 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @iran_cityofsun/41471 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC | @twovadeh/3179655 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @twovadeh | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 27 minutes | this entry (12–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 56 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @iran_cityofsun — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 24,062 | +17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 24,045 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 24,044 | +10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 24,034 | +81 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 23,953 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 23,947 | +23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 23,924 | +38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:45 | 23,886 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 23,876 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 23,872 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 23,868 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 23,867 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 23,868 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 23,871 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 23,870 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 23,880 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 23,881 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 23,885 | +8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 23,877 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 23,881 | first reading |
644 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 169 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 644 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 387,708 |
| Reactions total | 13,834 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49,500 reactions across 595 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26,566 | 53.7% | |
| ❤ | 11,242 | 22.7% | |
| 👏 | 4,971 | 10.0% | |
| 😭 | 3,932 | 7.94% | |
| 👎 | 2,069 | 4.18% | |
| 🥰 | 720 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 611 of the 644 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 644 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iran_cityofsun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 644 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
دو کلمه حرف حساب😉 قدرت تخریب ۱۰/۱۰ ه کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
👍75🥰7❤6👎2👏1
Signed ali
جادههای سراسر جزیره لانگ بیچ کاملاً زیر آب رفتهاند، زیرا یک طوفان قدرتمند و نه چندان شدید،این چنین موجی از آب را به این منطقه وارد کرده است. خیابانها به آبراه تبدیل شدهاند و سیل در برخی مناطق به خانهها رسیده است. اینجا یکی از نقاطی بود که آمریکایی ها مدعی مهندسی پیشرفته شهرسازی آن بودند به کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
👍50❤3👏2
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
اگر خود را در مقابل دشمنی با سلاحهای هستهای قرار میدهید، یا از ابتدا نباید درگیر شوید ، یا اگر دشمن حمله میکند و دنبال نابودی شماست هرگز نباید کوچکترین تردیدی در حمله سراسری و همچنین هسته ای شدن داشته باشید . اگر در حالی که دشمن به شما حمله میکند و شما را محاصره میکند، از حمله هستهای بترسید و در مورد پاسخ سنگین به دشمن مردد باشید، در نهایت هم خودتان مورد حمله هستهای قرار میگیرید و به خساراتی بدتر از آنچه که …
❤32👍20👎4😭4
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
اطلاعاتی در دست هست که نشان میدهد آمریکا با هواپیماهای غیر نظامی در حال اعزام نیرو به بحرین است. (صرفا جهت اطلاع) به کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
👍53👎3
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
تحلیل امروز درباره حرکت عربستان به سمت دستیابی به سلاح هسته ای و برخی تحولات مرتبط با سخنرانی مسعود پزشکیان در سازمان ملل و طراحی های جدید آمریکا و اسرائیل برای حمله به ایران است. لطفا با لایک و کامنت در انتشار ویدئو سهیم باشید. ممنونم لینک این تحلیل در کانال یوتیوب: https://youtu.be/P6c-2R-40Ag به کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
❤50👏9👍3😭1
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
ﺳﻠﺎم از ﺧﻄﻪ ﺳﺮدار ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻧﻰ... به کانال «ایران، شهر خورشید» بپیوندید 👇 @IRAN_CITYOFSUN
❤95
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
فرصتی پیدا شد تا از صمیم قلب از همه شما عزیزانی که در این چند هفته و ماه گذشته همه جوره در کنار خانواده «ایران شهر خورشید» بودید تشکر کنم. هم از عزیزانی که مطالب و تحلیلها را منتشر کردند و کمک کردند صدای این رسانه بیشتر شنیده شود و هم از دوستانی که در این شرایط سخت با حمایت مالیشان به ادامه استقلال این مسیر کمک کردند؛ واقعاً ممنونم. یک تشکر ویژه هم دارم از دوستانی که خارج از ایران هستند و با وجود فاصله، همیشه کنا…
❤47👍8👎2
Signed رضایی
اخیرا درباره فعالیت داعش در استان کرکوک عراق صحبت کردیم حال به جزئیات دیگر این حمله میپردازیم. در کرکوک، یک گروه تروریستی که خود را داعش مینامند، با استفاده از مواد منفجره، به یک خودرو متعلق به ارتش عراق در نزدیکی منطقه «دبس» حمله کرد. همچنین، به پایههای برق واقع در مسیر جاده «بیجی-حدیثه» نیز حمله کردند و چندین پایه فشار قوی را منهدم کردند. همچنین همزمان شاهد بودیم که در بخش غربی استان الانبار نیز به نیروهای شبهن…
❤41👍24
Signed رضایی
از مسیر «تعز الوازیه» به سمت کوه جبل نومان، با حضور نیروهای عربستان سعودی و امارات متحده عربی، مزدوران و گروههای تحت حمایت خارجی ها در حال تثبیت منطقه بودند و هرگز فکر نمیکردند به این زودی ها مورد حمله قرار بگیرند که به ناگهان مورد حمله ارتش یمن به رهبری انصارالله قرار گرفتند. ارتش یمن، به رهبری انصارالله، با تکنیک های جالب جنگ چریکی و با گروه های کم تعداد اما سریع با ایجاد حس آشفتگی،باعث شد تمام صفوف دشمنانشان دچا…
❤78👏20
Signed رضایی
در یک اتفاق ناگهانی دولت اوکراین دستور تخلیه مردم عادی از شهرهای دونتسک، اسلاویانسک و کراماتورسک را صادر کرده است. در صورتیکه تا دو روز پیش میگفتند هیچ مشکلی در این مناطق وجود ندارد و حتی نیروهای روسیه عقب نشینی کردند یعنی وادار به فرار شدند اما میبینیم که برعکس است گویا. دقت بفرمایید که این دستور تخلیه درواقع ، یک تاییدیه مبنی بر آغاز حملات مستقیم به این شهرها است، و این تصمیمها معمولاً هفتهها قبل از آغاز حملات …
❤34👍22
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
چند مطلب قبلتر درباره حرکت جوانان یک طایفه عراقی برای نجات هم طایفه ای های خود از دست دزدان دریایی صحبت کردیم این عکس مرتبط با این عملیات هست. گویا دزدان سومالیایی دریای وارد کشتی شده بودند و عراقی ها را آنجا اسیر گرفته بودند و خواهان باج بودند که پس از مذاکرات با دولت سومالی، با یک طایفه عراقی توافق شد تا نیروهای خود را از بصره برای نجات کشتی اعزام کند. نیروهای شبه نظامی این طایفه به کشتی که در شمال سومالی نگهداری …
👏59❤5👍3
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
در جنوب سوریه، ارتش اسرائیل به صورت مستمر و دوره ای حملاتی را انجام میدهد و سلاحهای باقیمانده از ارتش سوریه و همچنین سلاحهای مردم را جمعآوری میکند. در جنوب سوریه، مردم حتی در زمان بشار اسد نیز مسلح بودند و با شروع جنگ، به دلیل تهدید اسرائیل، میزان سلاحهای در دست مردم حتی افزایش یافته بود. اما اکنون، نیروهای "جولانی "، رهبر تروریستها، به همراه نیروهای اسرائیلی، به طور مشترک در حال خلع سلاح تمام مناطق تا دمشق ه…
👍44❤5👏3
Signed Dastyarkhabar1
Showing the 12 most recent of 644 posts we hold for @iran_cityofsun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@iran_cityofsun edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 76 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ایران،شهر خورشید” (@iran_cityofsun), 24,062 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iran_cityofsun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.