Channel
@ofogh_tv
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
7,053subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001007177125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ofogh_tv |
| Created | 23 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ofogh_tv |
Recorded in 2019 as “شبکه افق سیما” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 7,053 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 7,051 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,063 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 7,063 | first reading |
110 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 110 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,555 |
| Reactions total | 266 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
236 reactions across 66 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 151 | 64.0% | |
| 😡 | 26 | 11.0% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 8.90% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 7.63% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.12% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نجوای شاعرانه رهبر شهید با حضرت رضا علیهالسلام بر صحنهای حرم مطهر رضوی نقش بست 🔹در سالروز شهادت امام رئوف علیهالسلام و در آستانه ایام چهلمین روز تدفین آقای شهید ایران، کتیبههایی خطاطی شده با ابیات غزل سرودهی رهبر شهید انقلاب در نجوا با حضرت علی بن موسی الرضا علیهالسلام در صحنهای حرم مطهر رضوی نصب شده است. 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
❤2
🖼 این جنایتکاران که فهرستی از صدر تا ذیلشان موجود است، آرزوی مرگی آرام و در بستر را با خود به گور خواهند برد ✍🏻 بخشی از پیام رهبر معظّم انقلاب بهمناسبت تشییع و تدفین آقای شهید ایران | ۱۸/تیر/۱۴۰۵ 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
❤3
🗒 مأموریتهایی برای مواجهه سرنوشتساز با استکبار 📝 مروری بر مطالبات فرمانده معظّم کل قوا از فرماندهان جدید ستاد کل نیروهای مسلح و سپاه پاسداران ✍🏻 برگرفته از احکام انتصاب فرماندهان ستاد کل نیروهای مسلح و سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
🎥 گزارش شبکه الجزیره از آرایش جنگی جدید تهران؛ چه کسانی نیروهای مسلح را رهبری میکنند؟ 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
❤1😍1
شبکه افق pinned a photo
📰 #نبض_افق| شماره ۱۶ 🗓 سهشنبه، ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 🔹صمدی؛ پژوهشگر دفاع مقدس: جنگِ بُرده کردستان را پای میز مذاکره باختیم! 🔹امام خمینی(ره): هیچ خوفی از ابرقدرتها نداریم 🔹شهید آوینی: عاشورا هنوز نگذشته و کاروان کربلا هنوز در راه است... 🔹حملات و انفجارهای برنامهریزیشدهی ارتش رژیم صهیونیستی در روستای المنصوری در جنوب لبنان 🔹محرم پارسال کنارمان بودی، امسال اما جای تو خالیست... 🔹صفرنژاد: در دولت دوازدهم، بخش قابل ت…
❤2
🔻بمباران هوایی و بمبگذاری و انهدام منازل مردم روستای حداثا در جنوب لبنان 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
😡5
🏅مهمان ویژه برنامه پرچمدار؛ هلیا مهدیان، دبیر مجموعه بانوان پشتیبان جنگ #پرچمدار @Parchamdar_tv سهشنبه تا پنجشنبه ساعت ۲۰:۳۰ از شبکه افق 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
🚩 قاجار خاک را بخاطر شکست در جنگ، باخت و پهلوی بخاطر بردگی؛ اما اگر ما آن را بخاطر یک کنوانسیون ببازیم... 👤داریوش صفرنژاد کارشناس مسائل بینالملل #قرارگاه_جنگ 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
🚩 اگر ۴۴ سال پیش، مجلس کنوانسیون حقوق دریاها را تصویب کرده بود، امروز دیگر حاکمیتی بر تنگه نداشتیم 👤داریوش صفرنژاد کارشناس مسائل بینالملل #قرارگاه_جنگ 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
🤯1
🚩 باختنِ جنگِ برده کردستان پای میز مذاکره، تجربه گرانی است که باید از آن درس بگیریم! 👤محمدعلی صمدی پژوهشگر دفاع مقدس #قرارگاه_جنگ 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
😡1
📺 برنامه #قرارگاه_جنگ 🔹احمد کاظمی کارشناس مسائل سیاسی 🔹محمدمهدی غلامی کارشناس مسائل رژیم صهیونیستی 🔹سیاوش قدوسی کارشناس اروپا و ناتو 🗓 امشب، سهشنبه ۲۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ⏰ ساعت ۲۳ شبکه افق سیما 🌐 بله | ایتا | روبیکا | تلگرام | اینستاگرام | سایت 🆔@ofogh_tv
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @ofogh_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ofogh_tv edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 12,389 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبکه افق” (@ofogh_tv), 7,053 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofogh_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.