استاد #رائفی_پور 🔴 یک وعده ترسناک قوم ثمود آخرالزمان از شیعیان⁉️ 📌مشاهده فایل تصویری @raefipourfans
❤7

Channel
@raefipourfans
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
64,483subscribers
-236 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001130400707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raefipourfans |
| Description | کانال هواداران استاد رائفی پور گروه: https://t.me/+xnDuhmbtVlxiMDM0 یوتیوب: https://youtube.com/@raefipourffans ایتا: eitaa.com/raefipourfans ارسال سوژه: @sabz1421 تبلیغات👇 @tablighat_havadaran انتشار مطالب لزوما به معنی تایید محتوای آنها نیست |
| Created | 12 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raefipourfans |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 64,483 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 64,499 | -51 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 64,550 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 64,555 | +22 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 64,533 | +44 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 64,489 | -40 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 64,529 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 64,527 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 64,524 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 64,534 | +29 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 64,505 | -25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 64,530 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 64,523 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 64,540 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 64,556 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 64,579 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 64,590 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 64,610 | +59 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 64,551 | -66 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 64,617 | first reading |
1,765 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 967 of 969 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,765 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,519,004 |
| Reactions total | 105,982 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 423 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107,271 reactions across 987 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38,393 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 30,946 | 28.8% | |
| 🤬 | 21,882 | 20.4% | |
| 😍 | 4,949 | 4.61% | |
| 💔 | 4,263 | 3.97% | |
| 😢 | 2,315 | 2.16% | |
| 😭 | 1,678 | 1.56% | |
| 😐 | 1,238 | 1.15% | |
| 👎 | 680 | 0.634% | |
| 🤔 | 507 | 0.473% | |
| 🤯 | 420 | 0.392% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 987 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107,271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
استاد #رائفی_پور 🔴 یک وعده ترسناک قوم ثمود آخرالزمان از شیعیان⁉️ 📌مشاهده فایل تصویری @raefipourfans
❤7
🎥 زنگ خطر نماینده فارسیزبان اسرائیلی از سقوط و فروپاشی جایگاه این رژیم در جهان! @raefipourfans
👍39😍4❤1
📸 اطلاعیه دبیرخانه شورای عالی امنیت ملی درباره برخی اخبار خلاف واقع در موضوع حمل و نقل هوایی دبیرخانه شورای عالی امنیت ملی: 🔸انتشار برخی تفاسیر و نقل قولهای خلاف واقع از سخنان دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی درباره موضوع حمل و نقل هوایی، موجب طرح سوالات و ابهاماتی گردیده است که بدین وسیله اعلام میدارد: ۱- ادعای اینکه ایران در مقابل محدودیتهای هوایی اخیر دست به مقابله بهمثل نظامی میزند، تکذیب میشود. ۲- مذاکرات میا…
🤬46👍7❤3😍1
#اختصاصی 👤 استاد #رائفی_پور برخورد قاطع با فساد و آقازادگی 🔹 امیرالمؤمنین (ع) در برابر بیتالمال هیچ مماشاتی حتی با خانواده و نزدیکان خود نداشت. 🔹 وقتی عقیل (برادر حضرت) سهم بیشتری از بیتالمال خواست، حضرت آهن گداخته به دست او نزدیک کرد و فرمود: «تو از این آتش دنیا فرار میکنی، آن وقت برای علی آتش آخرت را میخواهی؟» 🔹 یا وقتی متوجه شد یکی از دخترانشان گردنبندی را از مسئول بیتالمال به عنوان «قرضِ ضمانتدار» برای ع…
❤46👍5
پاسخهای صریح تحلیلگر عرب به کارشناس حامی عربستان: 🔹مبارزه انصارالله علیه مداخله عربستان بسیار قدیمیتر از انقلاب ایران است؛ ریشه این منازعه به زیادهخواهیهای دیرینه ریاض بازمیگردد... 🔹همانطور که آمریکا و اسرائیل حق ائتلافسازی دارند، ایران و یمن نیز بر اساس منافع مشترک متحد شدهاند... @raefipourfans
❤64👍7
🎥 #سخنرانی استاد #رائفی_پور 🔴تهاجم فرهنگی و شیوه های مقابله با آن 📌مشاهده فایل تصویری @raefipourfans
❤14👍7
نماینده کنگره، ترامپ را فردی پیکمی خطاب کرد 👤مجری: "شما نامهای به کاخ سفید نوشتید و از رئیسجمهور ترامپ خواستید در دیدار با رئیسجمهور شی، درباره حمایت چین از ایران در این جنگ با او برخورد کند. آیا این اتفاق افتاد؟" 👤جیسون کرو: "نه، البته که نیفتاد. چیزی که من طی دو روز گذشته احساس کردهام، شرمساری بوده است ... به دونالد ترامپ نگاه کنید که برای جلب توجه شی تلاش میکند، پرواز هواپیماها را تماشا کنید و ببینید هلیپ…
👍25❤4
🎥 بخشهایی کمتردیدهشده از حضور رهبر شهید انقلاب با لباس رزم در جبهه غرب کشور @raefipourfans
❤86😍6💔4🤬2
🎥 اعتراض تند عبدالباری عطوان به تهدید یک ملت از تریبون سازمان ملل! 🔺تهدید یک ملت ۹۵ میلیونی از تریبون سازمان ملل، اوج توحش است! 🔹«عبدالباری عطوان» نویسنده و تحلیلگر سیاسی: این سیرک و نمایش مضحک که در سازمان ملل متحد و زیر گنبد این نهاد بینالمللی آغاز شد، تاسفبار است. تصور کنید رئیسجمهور آمریکا از تریبون سازمان ملل، یک ملت ۹۵ میلیون نفری را به نابودی تهدید میکند! این اوج توحش و نقض آشکار قوانین است. 🔺عجیب است ک…
👍77❤4
ما هنوز به ذخایر استراتژیکمان دست نزدیم و در برخی از کالاها بیش از نیاز کشور ذخیره کردیم/ محاصره دریایی اصلاً جای نگرانی ندارد و هیچ مشکلی نداریم ارسلان قاسمی، رئیس کمیسیون کشاورزی اتاق تعاون: 🔹ما با پاکستان، افغانستان، کشورهای CIS ، ترکیه و عراق هم مرز هستیم و راههای مختلفی برای کم اثر کردن محاصره دریایی داریم. @raefipourfans
❤68👍17
ناوهای آمریکایی بهدلیل توان موشکی ایران از خط محاصره دور شدند وبگاه امنیتی دیفنس سکیوریتی آسیا: ناوهای هواپیمابر و کشتیهای جنگی آمریکا پس از حمله موشکی ایران در ۵ سپتامبر، ظاهراً مواضع قبلی خود در نزدیکی دریای عمان را ترک کرده و به مناطق دورتر در دریای عرب منتقل شدهاند؛ تغییری که میتواند نشاندهنده نگرانی واشنگتن از آسیبپذیری ناوهای خود در برابر توان موشکی ایران باشد. بر اساس تصاویر ماهوارهای «سنتینل-۲»، ناوه…
👍56❤7
مجله نیویورکر، کاریکاتوری طنزآمیز درباره دیدار ترامپ و رئیسجمهور چین منتشر کرد @raefipourfans
👍99❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,765 posts we hold for @raefipourfans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 100 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RaefipourFans” (@raefipourfans), 64,483 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raefipourfans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.