Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
129 measurements spanning 98 days, net +23,253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,435–73,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 129
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:39
67,755
+5,909
11 Nov 2026, 17:15
61,846
-376
9 Nov 2026, 22:50
62,222
no change
9 Nov 2026, 22:04
62,222
-75
8 Nov 2026, 14:49
62,297
-2
8 Nov 2026, 14:20
62,299
-40
7 Nov 2026, 11:10
62,339
-7
7 Nov 2026, 08:44
62,346
-51
6 Nov 2026, 10:08
62,397
-20
6 Nov 2026, 05:30
62,417
-32
5 Nov 2026, 13:10
62,449
-10
5 Nov 2026, 01:40
62,459
-39
4 Nov 2026, 12:47
62,498
-5
3 Nov 2026, 22:08
62,503
-19
3 Nov 2026, 15:06
62,522
-29
2 Nov 2026, 20:27
62,551
-16
2 Nov 2026, 17:36
62,567
-61
1 Nov 2026, 22:11
62,628
-42
1 Nov 2026, 18:49
62,670
-53
1 Nov 2026, 01:07
62,723
first reading
Engagement
473 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.45%
avg views ÷ 67,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
979
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 473 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
473 (23 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
119,463
Reactions total
2,067
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,400
Videos
≈6,100
Links
≈9,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 36m
Average length
2m 09s
Measured directly from 185 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,293 reactions across 471 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,293
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 471 of the 473 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 473 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 16 of 122 posts held from the last 30 days (13.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📍برنامه جامع همکاری ۲۵ساله چارچوبی بلندمدت برای جهتدهی به همکاریهای دو کشور است و تحقق آن مستلزم تعریف پروژه، توافقات اجرایی، تأمین مالی و مسئولیتپذیری دستگاهها و بنگاههای ذیربط است.
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف، نماینده ویژه جمهوری اسلامی در امور چین، روزنامه صدای ایران|۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | روبیکا| آپارات| اینستاگرام
▫️ویراستی | فارس من | روبینو| یوتیوب |
▫…
📍فرصت چین؛ تأکید رهبری، الزام راهبردی
📌دکتر قالیباف نماینده ویژه جمهوری اسلامی در امور چین، در سرمقاله روزنامه اینترنتی دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار رهبر شهید انقلاب صدای ایران، نقشهی راه عملیاتی توسعه روابط ایران و چین در شرایط جدید بینالمللی را بررسی کرده است.
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | روبیکا| آپارات| اینستاگرام
▫️ویراستی | فارس من | روبینو| یوتیوب |
▫️سروش
▫️ @Ghalibaf
🔗 Gha…
📍ما از هرگونه پیوند و همکاری میان کشورهای اسلامی استقبال میکنیم| در نشست چهارجانبه تهران، که همه بر برگزاری آن تأکید داشتیم، بر این موضوع تأکید شد که رژیم صهیونیستی عامل اصلی ناامنی در منطقه است
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | روبیکا| آپارات| اینستاگرام
▫️ویراستی | فارس من | روبینو| یوتیوب |
▫️سروش
▫️ @Ghalibaf
🔗 Ghalibaf.ir
📍در خلال جنگ نیز با کشورهای منطقه در ارتباط بودیم و تماسهای خود را با آنها حفظ کردیم| وقتی آمریکا از آسمان و سرزمین یک کشور به ایران حمله میکند، ما ناگزیر به دفاع از خود هستیم| آمریکا برای منطقه ناامنی به ارمغان آورده است و ما در طول جنگ این موضوع را بهچشم دیدیم| باید در منطقه به سمت ایجاد امنیت پایدار حرکت کنیم و روابط خود را با کشورهای منطقه توسعه دهیم| اگر آمریکا در امور منطقه دخالت نکند، ناامنی وجود نخواهد دا…
📍درباره موضوع یمن، گفتوگویی با چین نداشتهایم| معتقدیم آمریکا باید از منطقه خارج شود| ایران هیچگاه تهدیدی برای کشورهای منطقه نبوده و در آینده نیز نخواهد بود
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | روبیکا| آپارات| اینستاگرام
▫️ویراستی | فارس من | روبینو| یوتیوب |
▫️سروش
▫️ @Ghalibaf
🔗 Ghalibaf.ir
📍در امور مربوط به چین، از سوی رهبر معظم انقلاب و دولت، مسئولیت پیگیری این موضوع را بر عهده دارم| چین شریک راهبردی ایران است و امروز به کشوری تأثیرگذار در سطح جهان و منطقه تبدیل شده است| معتقدیم روابط دوجانبه ایران و چین و همچنین روابط چین با کشورهای منطقه میتواند به تضمین ثبات منطقه کمک کند| چین با میانجیگری میان ایران و عربستان، توانست زمینه ازسرگیری روابط دو کشور را فراهم کند| از نقشآفرینی چین در منطقه استقبال م…
📍انصارالله یمن یک جنبش مردمی و در واقع، دولت یمن است| انصارالله بهعنوان دولت یمن و عربستان چالشهایی دارند یمن در برابر زیادهخواهیهای عربستان ایستاده است| اگر عربستان و یمن برای حل مشکلات خود از ایران درخواست کمک کنند، حتماً کمک خواهیم کرد|هیچکس نباید در امور داخلی یمن دخالت کند. اگر یمنیها مشکلات داخلی دارند، باید خودشان برای حل آن اقدام کنند
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محم…
📍هیچ تفاوتی میان آمریکا و رژیم صهیونیستی قائل نیستیم| آمریکا و رژیم صهیونیستی در یک جبهه قرار دارند و ایران و جبهه مقاومت نیز در جبههای واحد هستند
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | روبیکا| آپارات| اینستاگرام
▫️ویراستی | فارس من | روبینو| یوتیوب |
▫️سروش
▫️ @Ghalibaf
🔗 Ghalibaf.ir
📍پاسخ دکتر قالیباف به این سؤال که چرا تا این اندازه بر پایان جنگ در لبنان تأکید دارید:
ما و لبنان در یک جبهه هستیم| اگر هر کشور مسلمانی مورد تجاوز رژیم صهیونیستی قرار بگیرد، همه به آن واکنش نشان میدهیم| برای نخستین بار، پس از حمله رژیم صهیونیستی به لبنان بعد جنگ ۴۰روزه، از خاک سرزمین ایران به این رژیم حمله کردیم و پاسخ دادیم| در تفاهمنامه اسلامآباد، ترامپ پذیرفته است که حملات در لبنان متوقف شود و حاکمیت دولت لبن…
📍اگر جنگ ادامه پیدا کند، کشورهای منطقه آسیب خواهند دید و منطقه نیز از مسیر توسعه و پیشرفت عقب خواهد ماند| کشورهای منطقه باید از این تحولات درس بگیرند. آنها پیشتر تصور میکردند حضور آمریکا در منطقه برایشان امنیت به ارمغان میآورد، اما امروز دریافتهاند که حضور آمریکا نهتنها امنیتآفرین نیست، بلکه ناامنی را به منطقه آورده است
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام …
📍تنگه هرمز دیگر به شرایط پیش از جنگ بازنخواهد گشت|ایران و عمان درباره نحوه تردد در این تنگه به توافق رسیدهاند| آمریکا چهکاره است که از ۱۲ هزار کیلومتر آنطرفتر بیاید و درباره نحوه تردد در تنگه هرمز تصمیم بگیرد؟| اگر آمریکاییها میگویند تنگه هرمز تأثیری بر آنها ندارد، خب تنگه را رها کنند و بروند!
🔖محمدباقر قالیباف در گفتوگو با الجزیره:
📍پایگاه اطلاعرسانی محمدباقر قالیباف
▫️ تلگرام | توییتر| بله | ایتا | ر…
📍من بهعنوان یک مسئول، نباید درباره وقوع جنگ پیشگویی کنم؛ بلکه وظیفه دارم آن را پیشبینی کنم و کشور را برای مواجهه با آن آماده سازم| وقتی در هفت شرط ایران بر پایان جنگ در همه جبههها تأکید میکنیم، منظورمان پایان جنگ هم در ایران و هم در جبهه مقاومت است| ما هم برای جنگ و هم برای توافق آمادهایم| اگر رژیم صهیونیستی بخواهد بهتنهایی جنگی را علیه ایران آغاز کند، پاسخ ما متوجه آمریکا و رژیم صهیونیستی خواهد بود.
🔖محمدباق…
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 473 posts we hold for @ghalibaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ghalibaf edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 October 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
وحید یامین پور @yaminpour · 25,735 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
اخبار دکتر سعید جلیلی @jalili_saeed · 21,732 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
روزنامه وطن امروز @vatanemrooz · 16,118 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
اخبار مجلس شورای اسلامی @majles · 70,935 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
حمید رسایی @rasaee · 22,746 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
ایران امروز @iran_emrooz · 19,084 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
اخبار رهبر شهید انقلاب 🇮🇷 @khamenei_irnews · 397,275 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 August 2026
طنز سیاسی دکترسلام @drsalaam · 33,671 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
علیرضا پناهیان @Panahian_ir · 64,377 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال رسمی میثم مطیعی @MeysamMotiee · 32,761 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
میز سبز | اخبار مجلس @MizSabz · 47,873 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
حسینیه ریحانه الحسین(س) @reyhanatolhossein_channel · 30,971 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمدباقر قالیباف” (@ghalibaf), 67,755 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghalibaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.