National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,959–15,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:37
14,965
-13
13 Aug 2026, 09:13
14,978
-6
12 Aug 2026, 08:43
14,984
-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:41
14,987
-6
10 Aug 2026, 04:33
14,993
-4
9 Aug 2026, 06:43
14,997
-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:16
14,999
-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:22
15,002
-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:10
15,004
-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:21
15,008
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
15,008
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 14,965 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.615%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
44 (30 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
96,308
Reactions total
592
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,340
Videos
≈1,230
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 28m
Average length
13m 03s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
563 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
411
73.0%
❤
91
16.2%
👏
28
4.97%
👌
26
4.62%
👎
4
0.71%
🙏
3
0.533%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌گرانیهای امروز هیچ ربطی به جنگ و محاصره ندارد و اگر جنگ هم نمیشد به دلیل سیاستهای ارزی دولت پزشکیان در دی ماه پارسال، دقیقا همین گرانیهای امروز را شاهد بودیم
🔹مصطفی طاهری، عضو کمیسیون صنایع و معادن مجلس:
قبل از جنگ به دولت پزشکیان گفتیم، اگر ارز ترجیحی را حذف کنید قیمت تمام کالاها چند برابر خواهد شد، گوش نکردند، حذف کردند، حالا میگویند عامل گرانیها جنگ است!
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_…
📌مسئولی که در شرایط جنگی، مدام از "قحطی"،"کمبود" و "عدم فروش نفت" حرف میزند، هر کجای دنیا بود با این مسئول برخورد قضائی میکردند
🔹مصطفی طاهری، عضو کمیسیون صنایع و معادن مجلس:
برای اینکه ثابت کنند تفاهمنامه با آمریکا خیلی خوب بسته شد، مدام میگوید ما در محاصره نتوانستیم یک قطره نفت هم بفروشیم، بر فرض که درست است، چرا مدام پالس ضعف ارسال میکنید؟
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_اسرائیل
🇮🇷منتظرا…
📌مدیر شبهدولتی ۴۰۰میلیون در ماه دریافت میکند
🔹مجتبی یوسفی، نماینده مجلس:
یک مدیر شبهدولتی در خرداد ماه ۳۰۰ میلیون تومان حق ماموریت برای حضور در محل کار خود دریافت کرده و با احتساب ۱۰۰ میلیون تومان حقوق در مجموع ۴۰۰ میلیون تومان در یک ماه دریافت کرده است و رقمی که با حقوق متخصصان واقعی صنعت نفت و گاز قابلقیاس نیست
🔹در اقدامی دیگر دو مدیر در اهواز در حالی که به جوانان بومی خوزستان، سیستان، سوسنگردی و باغملکی گفته…
📌وعدههای دروغین در راستای کسب رای!
🔹در جریان انتخابات ریاستجمهوری سال ۱۴۰۳، مسعود پزشکیان و اعضای ستاد انتخاباتی او درباره افزایش قیمت بنزین مواضعی را مطرح کردند که بخشهایی از آن بر مخالفت با افزایش قیمت بدون رضایت مردم تاکید داشت.
👈#اینفو_گرافیک
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_اسرائیل
💠@sobh_iran
👈بسته خبری
📌توییت سید محمود نبویان (نماینده مردم تهران)
🔹عدهای در کشور، استاد تحمیل هزینههای سنگین بر ملت هستند،
همین اساتید بودند که خسارت توافق سعدآباد و پاریس، توافق ژنو و توافق خسارت محض برجام را به نفع دشمنان بر ملت تحمیل کردند و اکنون نیز همه کارهی مذاکرات هستند. تا چه زمانی ملت ایران باید این افراد معلومالحال را تحمل کند؟
📌توییت میثم ظهوریان (نماینده مردم مشهد)
🔹هفته پیش جلسه با سازمان برنامه در…
📌مسئولان بهجای بازخوانی، باید پاسخگو باشند
🔹️مسئولان خودشان برای خودشان روضه میخوانند، در حالی که انگشت اشاره، برآنچه باید باشد،به سمت خود آنان است.
🔹️اندیشه و توصیههای رهبرشهید باید آویزه گوش مسئولان باشد ومنطبق با آن عمل کنند نه آن که صحبت از بازخوانی اندیشههایی دهند که باید به آن عمل میکردند! مسئولان باید درباره وضع موجود جامعه، از وضعیت پوشش و حجاب گرفته تا کاهش نرخ فرزندآوری و مسائل فرهنگی و اجتماعی، پاسخگو…
📌افشاگری نماینده مجلس از نامه جنجالی وزارت خارجه به مجلس درباره تنگه هرمز/ وزارت خارجه وسط جنگ به ما نامه دادند قانون تنگه هرمز را در مجلس تصویب نکنید
👈مجتبی یوسفی، عضو هیات رئیسه مجلس:
🔹نیروهای مسلح ما بودند که دشمن را به زانو درآوردند و انرژی را مدیریت کردند، تنگه هرمز هم ارث پدری ماست.
🔹از همان ابتدا که بحث قانون مدیریت راهبردی تنگه هرمز در مجلس و در جریان جنگ ۴۰ روزه توسط برخی نمایندگان مطرح و طرح اولیه آن آما…
📌وزیر خارجه کفایت لازم را ندارد
🔹ابوالفضل ظهرهوند، عضو کمیسیون امنیت ملی مجلس گفت:
ما باید با شرکای اصلی خودمان، یعنی روسیه و چین، رایزنی کنیم؛ چراکه فرجام همه ما در برابر تهدیدها یکی است.
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_اسرائیل
🇮🇷منتظران صبح ایران فردا
تلگرام | ایتا | توییتر | سایت | اینستاگرام
💠@sobh_iran
📌تأثیر عدم پرداخت پول گندمکاران در زمان مناسب
🔹پیمان فلسفی، رئیس فراکسیون کشاورزی پویا و امور عشایر مجلس در گفتگو با «خانه اقتصاد»:
🔹گندمکاران به دلیل بدعهدی دولت، گندم خود را به واسطهها و دامداریها دادند/فقط ۷ تا ۸ میلیون تن گندم تحویل دولت شده، در حالی که برآوردها حاکی از تولید ۱۴.۵ میلیون تن گندم بود.
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_اسرائیل
🇮🇷منتظران صبح ایران فردا
تلگرام | ایتا | تویی…
📌حدف ارز ترجیحی، قیمت کالاها را چند برابر کرد/ سیاستهایی که دولت پزشکیان قبل از شروع جنگ رمضان آغاز کرد، تورم ایجاد کرد
🔹پیمان فلسفی، رئیس فراکسیون کشاورزی پویا و امور عشایر مجلس در گفتگو با «خانه اقتصاد»:
🔹بلافاصله بعد از حذف ارز ترجیحی قیمت کالاهای کشاورزی چند برابر شد/حذف ارز ترجیحی به گرانی کالاهای کشاورزی دامن زد.
👈#یالثارات_الحسین
👈#خونخواه_رهبر
👈#مرگ_بر_آمریکا_اسرائیل
🇮🇷منتظران صبح ایران فردا
تلگرام |…
📌گره زدن مدیریت ایران در تنگه هرمز به مذاکره با آمریکا اشتباه است
👈میثم ظهوریان، نماینده مردم مشهد و کلات در مجلس شورای اسلامی
🔹️کشورهایی مانند آمریکا و انگلیس دول بحری(دریایی) هستند و به دلیل [و با هدف] حضور موثر دریایی در نقاط مختلف دنیا اساساً با هرگونه قاعده گذاری موثر بر عبور از آبراهها مخالفند.
🔹️قواعدی مانند عبور بیضرر و عبور ترانزیتی از دل مخالفت همین دولتها با قاعده گذاری در کنوانسیونهای بینالمللی بر…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @sobh_iran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 126,801 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Masaf | مؤسسه مصاف @masaf · 190,345 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صبح ایران” (@sobh_iran), 14,965 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobh_iran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.