Channel
@Enaarah
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,354subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001194587353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Enaarah |
| Created | 4 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Enaarah |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 3,354 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 3,359 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 3,365 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 3,363 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,300 |
| Reactions total | 1,483 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,483 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,483 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حزب سوسیالدموکراتهای امریکا که به سوسیالیسم اعتقاد دارن، پیروزیهای قابل توجهی در انتخاباتهای مقدماتی حزب دموکرات در مناطق کنار برخوردار و رنگینپوست کسب کردن. در کل، دنبال کردن تحولاتشون جالبه. اگر خواستید در موردش بخونید میتونید کلیدواژه DSA یا democratic socialists of America رو جستوجو کنید.
❤29
به صلاح خودش و کشوره که در دهن اون گوسفند رو بگیرن. باز الان یه مصاحبه میکنه الکی برای خودش فحش میخره.
❤94
خدایا! تو شاهد باش که از زمین و آسمان آتش جوشید و بارید و ما پشت اولاد حضرت زهرا رو خالی نکردیم. خدایا شاهد باش که تمام مواهب و نعمات دنیا رو به ما پیشکش کردن ولی ما پشت اولاد حضرت زهرا رو خالی نکردیم.
❤250
باز باید روی حفاظت از شخصیتها تاکید موکد بکنم. خدای ناکرده باز یک هفته نگذره ما ببینیم جلسه گذاشته بودید طبقهی دهم یه برج وسط تهران! هیچ چیزی روی زمین نیست که حضور افراد بهش نیاز داشته باشه. باید برنامهی مشخص وجود داشته باشه که در صورت قطع برق و بیرون اومدن مردم، چه برنامهای هست برای جلوگیری از تبدیلش به شورش و جنگ شهری.
❤96
محتملترین اقدامی که احتمال حمله به زیرساختهای انرژی ایران رو کاهش میده، حملهی پیشدستانه به زیرساختهای انرژی کویت بهعنوان نمونهکار در صورت حمله به زیرساختهای انرژی ایرانه. نباید صبر کنیم که وقتی زدن تازه به فکر جواب دادن بیفتیم.
❤99
باز حالا خراتیان بیاد در مورد نظم چینی و چین و... شعر سپید بگه! در پاسخ به ناامنیهای ایجاد شده در آبراهههای بابالمندب و سوئز و کلا منطقهی مدیترانه، چینیها خودشون (اروپاییها نه) مسیر کشتیرانی قطبی به اروپا رو دارن راهاندازی میکنن تا خللی در تجارت با اروپا وارد نشه. همین الان چین اگر تقاضای نفت خودش رو به حالت عادی برگردونه، آمریکا بهخاطر قیمت نفت به خاک سیاه میشینه. ولی نمیکنه. بعد اینجا دوستان انتظار دار…
❤82
◽هر چقدر از اهمیت هدایت ماهوارهای و تصویر زنده از هدف بگم، کم گفتم. ما گفتیم که ما چون دقت کارمون کم بوده، ستون فقرات حملاتمون حملات انبوه بوده. که در غیاب نیروی هوایی، دشمن عملا امکانش رو از ما گرفت. حالا با اضافه شدن کمکهای ماهوارهای، دیگه نیازی به حملات انبوه نیست. هدایت و هدفگیری به صورت زنده و برخط این امکان رو به ما میده که حملاتمون رو دقیق و موثر و با تعداد خیلی کمتر انجام بدیم. "اگر" این امکان از هر…
❤121
وضعیت:
❤57
◽سه عامل مهم محدودکنندهی مهم وجود داره که دست آمریکا رو برای تشدید و تمدید عملیات میبنده. اولین و مهمترینش بازار انرژیه. ذخایر نفت آمریکا -فارغ از جنگ یا صلح- رو به کاهش میرن و در خال حاضر بزرگترین تنظیمکنندهی قیمت نفت نه آمریکا که کاهش تقاضای چینه. و البته نابودی تقاضا در بازارهای نفت که احتمالا خودش رو در گزارش چارک اقتصادی بعدی نشون خواهد داد. ▫️مورد مهم دوم، بحث مهمات آفندی و پدافندیه. ارقام عجیب و غر…
❤67
▫️شاید مهمترین جنبهی کاری که ایران باید بکنه، بحث حفاظت از شخصیتهاست. بنیان کار آمریکا و اسرائیل، ترور و امید به ردهی بعدی مسئولینه تا بتونن به هدفشون برسن. مسئولین از صدر تا ذیل تا جای ممکن نباید از پناهگاهها بیرون بیان و حداکثر مسائل حفاظتی باید براشون لحاظ بشه. مسالهی بعدی هم مسالهی انتقال دستورات به یگانهای عملیاتیه. هر پرواز اسرائیلیها باید به منزلهی اقدام برای جنگ تلقی شده و یگانها برای پاسخ بلافاص…
❤75
#استوری ▪️ تنها نسیمی که از اخلاص تجربه کردهایم تلگرام | ایتا | بله | روبیکا | آپارات | سایت | اینستاگرامِ سایت | صفحه یوتیوب
❤34
این سهتا تصویر در کنار هم تصویر قشنگی از آیندهی اقتصاد آمریکا و جهان ارائه نمیده. با اینحال یا ترامپ خروجی این چیزها رو (که در صورت تشدید تنش در خلیج فارس و دریای سرخ بدتر هم میشه) نادیده گرفته یا اینکه چیز دیگری کلا در دستور کار داره که ما نمیدونیم.
❤38
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Enaarah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 544,529 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solitude” (@Enaarah), 3,354 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Enaarah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.