🎥 ببینید ❓چرا برخی، گوش شنوا نسبت به حرفهای حق ندارند؟ 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 ✅ اگر بدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤4

Channel
@haerishirazi
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,844subscribers
+315 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001009808154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @haerishirazi |
| Description | دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار آیت الله حائری شیرازی نظرات و پیشنهادات 👈 @haeri1395 ادمین فروش کتاب: شماره تماس: 02536704311 09195194676 |
| Created | 17 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haerishirazi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Recorded in 2019 as “نکات و تمثیلات آیت الله حائری شیرازی(ره” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:39 | 7,844 | +11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:17 | 7,833 | +5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 7,828 | +19 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 7,809 | +40 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 7,769 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 7,760 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 7,752 | +10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:55 | 7,742 | -6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 7,748 | +32 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 09:35 | 7,716 | +30 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 7,686 | +29 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 7,657 | +60 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 7,597 | +24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 7,573 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 7,569 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 7,556 | +11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 7,545 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 7,544 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 7,545 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 7,543 | first reading |
84 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (21 July 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,012 |
| Reactions total | 353 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 01:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
716 reactions across 64 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 652 | 91.1% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 3.07% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.37% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 1.96% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 18 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎥 ببینید ❓چرا برخی، گوش شنوا نسبت به حرفهای حق ندارند؟ 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 ✅ اگر بدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤4
🔸علت اهمیت روضهخوانی برای حضرت زهرا (س)🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 شما که روضۀ فاطمۀ زهرا (س) را میخوانید و از ایشان یاد میکنید، خیلی کار بزرگی میکنید. روضه، خیلی کار بزرگی است. روضه یعنی چه؟ یعنی شما میگویی همۀ جریانهای دیگر، سطحی هستند و فرو میپاشند. هیچکدام از اینها دوامی ندارند. شما که روضه میخوانید، دارید به بشر نشان میدهید که جوجه را آخر پاییز میشمارند؛ همۀ مخالفین فاطمه (س) از بین میروند؛ اما جریان…
❤12💯7
🔸علت اهتمام ویژۀ اولیای خدا به نماز🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 اگر به دست کسی که در قعر چاهی صدمتری است، طنابی بدهند و او را تا پنجاه متر بالا بکشند، این طناب برای آن شخص چقدر اهمیت دارد؟ او میداند که اگر این طناب شل شود، از بالا به پایین پرت میشود. این طناب، بند جان اوست. نماز برای آنها که بالا آمدهاند و میدانند کجای عالماند، مثل همان طناب است. کسی که فقط یک متر با آن طناب بالا آمده، با خود میگوید اگر طناب پ…
❤17
🔊 بشنوید ❌ برداشت غلط از روایت معروف 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 ▫️لحظهٔ ظهور، لحظهٔ آغاز عدالت نیست، لحظهٔ فوران عدالت است! ✅ اگر بهدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤8
🔸چلوکباب برای اسب خوب است!🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 اینکه میگویند نماز فلان نتیجۀ اقتصادی، بهداشتی و ورزشی را دارد، مثل این است که کسی بگوید چلوکباب برای اسب خوب است! چون چلوکباب برای سوارکار خوب است و وقتی سوارکار حالش خوب شد، بهتر اسب میراند و این برای اسب هم خوب است و کمتر اذیت میشود!! ✅ اگر بدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤10
🔸فاطمۀ زهرا (س) و پیروزیهای بزرگ🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 🗓 خداوند متعال، چنین تقدیر کرده که #پیروزیهای_بزرگ، به نام #فاطمه_زهرا (سلام الله علیها) ثبت شود. در همین جنگ خودمان، بزرگترین پیروزیهای ما در عملیاتهایی بود که با رمز «یا زهرا (س)» انجام میگرفت. مثل عملیات «فتح المبین» یا «والفجر هشت» و فتح فاو که فتح بسیار بزرگی است و وضع را تغییر داد. این کربلاهای اخیر هم باز به نام حضرت زهرا (سلام الله علیها) بوده. …
❤14
🔸رابطهٔ نماز و انصاف🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 انسان در وقت نماز مهمان انصاف خود است و هرچه منصفتر باشد، نماز را صحیحتر بهجا میآورد. حال اعتراف، حال تضرع و حال تعظيم در برابر خدا، مولود انصاف آدمی است و مثل آب که در رودخانه جاری است، رکوع و سجود انسان را سرسبز میکند. ✅ اگر بدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤11🔥1😍1
🎥 ببینید ❓حسادتم را چگونه درمان کنم؟ 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 ✅ اگر بدنبال حکمتهای ناب هستید، هماکنون عضو کانال آیتالله حائری شیرازی شوید: http://t.me/+PDBzGjBq2z2EpWMk
❤15
✍️ ادمین: در زمان حیات پربرکت مرحوم استاد آیتالله حائری شیرازی (ره)، یکبار برای گفتگو و مشورت در زمینۀ تدوین و نشر آثار، خدمت ایشان رسیده بودیم. از نخستین توصیههایی که به ما داشتند این بود: «کاری کنید کتابها تا حد امکان، ارزان به دست مخاطب برسد.» دغدغهٔ اصلی ایشان این بود که گرانی، مانع رسیدن معارف دینی به مشتاقان نشود. متاسفانه در یکی دو سال اخیر، با افزایش شدید تورم و بهای کاغذ، قیمت کتابها چنان افزایش یافت…
❤24😍4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔸جنگ با آمریکا، مشکل حجاب را حل خواهد کرد🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 در آینده، حتی همین بدحجاب و بیحجابها که در این مسائل با شما دعوا و اختلاف دارند، اگر مسئلۀ جنگ با آمریکا و امثال اینها پیش بیاید، مشکلاتی که با اینها دارید، حل میشود. میبینید که این روسریها کمکم به جلو بر میگردد؛ چون در مقابل جنگ با آمریکا، با شما جنگ نمیکنند. میآیند و از شما درخواست کمک میکنند که ما چطور کمکرسانی کنیم؟ شما نگاه به قیافه…
❤19
. 🔸ماموریت خضرگونهٔ ولیفقیه در هدایت امت اسلامی در برابر ابرقدرتها 🔸 🔹آیت الله حائری شیرازی🔹 جایگاه رهبر نسبت به علمای دیگر مثل خضر(ع) نسبت به موسی(ع) است. موسی(ع) با تمام صداقت، با تمام عشق به دین و به امر به معروف و نهی از منکر، در مواردی که خضر تصمیم میگرفت و قدم بر میداشت، به او اعتراض میکرد. اعتراض موسی(ع) به خضر(ع)، نه از روی هوی و هوس بود، نه از روی دنیاطلبی. دقیقاً به خاطر حفظ حکم الله بود، اما واقعیت …
❤43😍2💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @haerishirazi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نکات ناب و حکمت های آیت الله حائری شیرازی” (@haerishirazi), 7,844 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haerishirazi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.