Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

World Of Security

@world_of_security

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,264subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148893342
TypeChannel
Username@world_of_security
DescriptionContactus: @nashenas_tm @cyberknight0_0
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/world_of_security

Growth

5,2545,2645,2597 August 2026 — 5,254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,255 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,264 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,253–5,266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:515,264+9
8 Aug 2026, 03:365,255+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:015,254no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:495,254first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 5,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.924%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total5,303
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Videos
10
Links
621

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

235 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6929.4%
6326.8%
🔥5623.8%
😁4418.7%
👏20.851%
🥰10.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,010 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بیچاره شدم سر این تا بتونم به زبون ساده توضیح بدم :)

13

1 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC953 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔍 تحلیل یک باگ جالب در Node.js و llhttp در این آسیب‌پذیری، مهاجم هدر زیر را همراه با یک درخواست جعلی ارسال می‌کند: Connection: close<TAB> منظور از <TAB> یک کاراکتر تب واقعی بعد از کلمه close است. معماری معمول هدف: Attacker → Reverse Proxy → Node.js Backend فرانت‌اند یا Reverse Proxy ممکن است مقدار زیر را همان Connection: close در نظر بگیرد: Connection: close<TAB> یعنی تصور کند بعد از پردازش درخواست فعلی، اتصال باید ب

🔥92👍2

19 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,620 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دوستان سلام کسی از 3hcloud سرور خریده ؟ سوالی که دارم اینه که چک نمیکنه مستر کارت رو که حتما به نام خودم باشه ؟

👍1

11 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,770 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

پیش فروش کتاب جامع تست نفوذ وب ( جلد اول ) شروع شد . تالیف : میثم منصف قیمت نهایی کتاب : 18,000,000 ریال با تخفیف 15 درصد 15,300,000 ریال دقت داشته باشید در حال دریافت مجوز کتاب هستیم و فعلا پیش فروش فقط از طریق وب سایت انجام میشود. تا تاریخ 1405/05/05 فرصت دارید پیش ثبت نام و هزینه آن را پرداخت کنید چون تعداد محدودی چاپ میشود . این کتاب فقط به صورت حضوری در تهران قابل تهیه و دریافت است و متأسفانه امکان ارسال بر

3🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC≈2,080 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نمی‌فهمم بخدا. تا میاییم یزره به زندگیمون برسیم چنتا چیز یادبگیریم ی کوچولو کار کنیم جنگ میشه :) این زندگی نیست بخدا

👍373

8 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,110 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

RedWing: A Mobile Malware-as-a-Service Operation https://zimperium.com/blog/redwing-a-mobile-malware-as-a-service-operation

🔥5

6 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC≈2,000 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁23

6 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC≈1,660 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

این مخزن میاد تمامی برنامه هارو از پلتفرم های باگ بانتی جمع آوری می‌کنه و اونارو در اختیارتون قرار میده چیز عجیبی نیست و قدیمی هم هست اما خب هنوز هم می‌تونه کار آمد باشه. https://github.com/arkadiyt/bounty-targets-data

🔥72

6 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,940 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐘 PHP PDO layer exposed! Aleksey Solovev & Nikita Sveshnikov uncovered 2 flaws: SQL Injection in pdo_firebird (CVE-2025-14179) and DoS in PDO via pdo_pgsql (CVE-2025-14180). https://swarm.ptsecurity.com/hack-the-elephant-one-bite-at-a-time-nul-byte-sql-injection-in-pdo_firebird-and-null-pointer-dereference-in-pdo-pgsql/

5🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,360 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اگر محتوا های این مدلی رو در کنار دیگر لینک های که می‌خونیم دوست دارید ری اکشن بزارید موضوع این چیت شیت ها اینه که چیز هایی که می‌خونیم و تحقیق میکنیم رو می‌دیم به ai خلاصشو براتون شیر میکنیم پس با ری اکشناتون روی پست بالا مارو حمایت کنید

13👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @world_of_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Computer & IT Engineering
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 188,254
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
تکنولوژی،خبری،هوش مصنوعی،
@ITSecurityComputer · 164,944
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“World Of Security” (@world_of_security), 5,264 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/world_of_security.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.