جلسه سوم مینی دوره جرم شناسی لینوکس Linux Forensic https://aparat.com/v/rfxxuc0 فایل مورد بررسی : https://cdn.13cubed.com/downloads/linux_challenge.zip

Channel
ITShield
@itshield
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,260subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001293761600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itshield |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itshield |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 15,260 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 15,240 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 15,222 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 15,217 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 15,218 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 15,208 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 15,205 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 15,205 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.8%
- avg views ÷ 15,260 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,700
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 April 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,700 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 201
- Videos
- 511
- Links
- 363
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 36m 21s
- Average length
- 12m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
جلسه دوم مینی دوره جرم شناسی لینوکس Linux Forensic https://aparat.com/v/nxi6mky
جلسه اول مینی دوره جرم شناسی لینوکس Linux Forensic https://aparat.com/v/yll4ujy
جلسه هجدهم از ماژول دوم دوره رایگان CEH v13 بارگزاری شد دلیل اطلاع رسانی تو کانال اینه که چون بحث جمع آوری اطلاعات در باره اشخاص و شماره تلفن بود تارگت رو رژیم اسرائیل قرار دادیم و برخی منابع پابلیک که میشه از اونجا شماره تلفن اشخاص و ... رو در اون منطقه استخراج کرد رو معرفی کردم: https://aparat.com/v/ibkc97h علاوه بر شماره تلفن میشه چیزهای دیگه هم استخراج کرد ( گر در خانه کس هست یک حرف بس است )
لطفا اجازه اتصال اینترنت بین الملل سازمان را (تا اطمینان از بروزسانی و نصب همه وصله های امنیتی که در این چند وقت انجام نشده) ندهید دلیل : تجربه و ... 🤐 ( سربسته بگم تا الان چند سازمان با درجه حیاتی گزارش حمله شده ) این توصیه غیر از بحث جدا بودن اینترنت سازمان با بخش صنعتی هست که کلا حتی با اسباب بازیهای یکسویه ساز هم نباید وصل کنین و کلا این قانون کلی هست و ربطی به الان و دیروز و فردا هم نداره
https://aparat.com/v/xdxc82j جلسه هفتم ماژول دوم دوره رایگان CEH v13 منتشر شد دلیل اطلاع رسانی مستقل این ویدیو اینه که تو ویدیو به فراخور موضوع یه مقداری راجع به پیدا کردن تارگت راحت در رژیم اسراییل صحبت کردم تو ویدیوهای بعدی هم که تا شب بارگزاری میشه سعی میکنم اونا رو در رژیم پیاده سازی کنیم
فایل چالشی که مورد بررسی قرار گرفته
یکی از چالش های ساده تحلیل بدافزار بحث استخراج متن و نوشته ها در بدافزار است که یکی از زیرمجموعه های تحلیل بدافزار ایستا (Static Analysis) محسوب میشه این هم یکی از چالشهای سایت malwaretech.com هست که ویدیو بررسی اون رو در کانال آپارات گذاشتم https://aparat.com/v/dhugv4k
یکی از چالش های ساده تحلیل بدافزار بحث استخراج متن و نوشته ها در بدافزار است که یکی از زیرمجموعه های تحلیل بدافزار ایستا محسوب میشه این هم یکی از چالشهای سایت malwaretech.com هست که ویدیو بررسی اون رو در کانال آپارات گذاشتم https://aparat.com/v/dhugv4k
قبلا این دوره فقط در تلگرام بود که به هدف دسترسی راحت تر در آپارات داره بارگزاری میشه
https://www.aparat.com/playlist/25580860/ دوره رایگان MCSE مایکروسافت در آپارات توضیح اینکه این دوره هم دوره مقدماتی برای کسانی بود که میخان وارد دنیای تست نفوذ بشن و بعد از گذروندن دوره CCNA رایگان که قبلا پابلیک کردم این دوره رو میدیدن تا با نحوه راه اندازی و پس زمینه شبکه های مایکروسافتی و نحوه ارتباط و مدیریت اون کامل آشنا بشن هدف این نبوده که دانشجو مهندس مایکورسافت بشه بلکه هدف از این دوره این بوده که آن چیزی …
https://www.aparat.com/playlist/25556034 دوره رایگان CCNA در آپارات توضیح اینکه این دوره یه مقداری مباحث مقدماتی قبل از اون و مباحث فراتر از CCNA رو هم شامل هست چون در اصال این دوره به عنوان نقطه شروع برای کسانی بود که میخواستن وارد دنیای تست نفوذ شبکه بشن پس من اون موقع سرفصل CCNA رو جلوی روم گذاشتم و یه سری مباحث مقدماتی هم بهش اضافه کردم و یه سری مباحث سطح بالاتر و یه سری مباحث امنیتی و نتیجه شد این دوره که انصافا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @itshield. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 448,342 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ITSecurityComputer · 164,902
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 188,254
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ITShield” (@itshield), 15,260 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itshield.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.