Channel
@sourceiran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,329subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001005391347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sourceiran |
| Created | 29 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sourceiran |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 21,329 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 21,332 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 21,333 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 21,335 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 21,345 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 21,354 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 21,361 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 21,361 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40,693 |
| Reactions total | 915 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
849 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 414 | 48.8% | |
| 👏 | 256 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 117 | 13.8% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 2.71% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 2.00% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 1.53% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 0.942% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.118% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 915reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▫️ چـرا سـرویـس و خـدمـات طـراحـی سـایـت مـا نمـیفـروشـه؟ 💬 تجربه من از جلسات مشاوره در زمینه مشتـری یابـی بـرای خـدمـات طـراحـی سـایـت #️⃣ #مارکتینگ #از_جنس_تجربه
❤12👍2👏2🤩2
▶️ خـدا بـود ایـن ویـدیـو ... در مورد استارتاپهاست این قسمت🎮 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ✔️ خـلاق مثـل بلـکفـری 😎 #️⃣ #فان ⭐️ @sourceiran
❤24👏4🐳2👍1
☄️ بزرگترین اشتباه آدمهای امروز اینه که برای یاد گرفتن یه مهارت، سه سال وقت میذارن! ۱۰، ۱۵ سال پیش شاید این کار جواب میداد چون متخصص کم بود؛ هرچی بیشتر یاد میگرفتی، جلوتر بودی. ✏️ ولی الان بازی عوض شده. 💠 طرف میخواد ادیت ویدیو یاد بگیره، دو ساله هنوز داره آموزش میبینه! 😑 خب داداش… ادیت که دکترا نیست! ⚡️ بعد میخوای برنامهنویسی یاد بگیری، مارکتینگ، فروش، طراحی… 🚫 با این سرعت، تا بخوای ۵ تا مهارت بلد باشی، ۱…
❤31👍5👏1🤩1
▫️ بـرنـامـهنـویـسهـا در کانـادا و آمـریـکا بـا AI چطـور کار مـیکنـن؟ 💬 تجربه دوستم از کار با هوش مصنوعی تو پـروژههـا و شـرکـتهـای کانـادا #️⃣ #هوش_مصنوعی
👏19❤7👍2
▫️ تازگیها زیاد اسم LLM رو میشنویم. دقیقا چیه؟ ❔ دیدی یه بچه هرچی بیشتر کتاب بخونه، کلمات بیشتری یاد میگیره؟ بعد کمکم وقتی باهاش حرف میزنی، میتونه جملههای بهتر بسازه. حالا LLM هم یه جورایی همینه؛ ولی خیلی خیلی بزرگتر! 📝 کلی متن و مثال دیده و یاد گرفته که کلمهها معمولاً چطور کنار هم قرار میگیرن 📝 وقتی تو یه جمله بهش میدی، سعی میکنه حدس بزنه بعدش چه کلمهای باید بیاد 📝 همین حدس زدن رو بارها و بارها انجا…
❤31🤩2👏1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤19👍1👏1🤩1
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤18💯3🐳1👍1👏1
💠 طـرف بـرای گـرفتـن فـانـد، بیـش از 500 ایمیـل فـرستـاده ... 📧 دانشگاه شریف درس خونده و میگه بعضیها نزدیک 2 هزار تا ایمیل میفرستن. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 🎙 بعدش ویسهای پایین رو گوش بده ...👇 #️⃣ #بررسی_و_تحلیل
👏12❤3🤯1
امـان از ذهـن فقیـر... همهمون یه جاهایی ذهنمون فقیره؛ ولی بعضیا واقعاً خیلی خیلی فقیر فکر میکنن.😑 یه بار به یکی گفتم: «بیا یه کم با ذهن باز حساب کنیم. تو بهعنوان طراح سایت، ماهی چندتا پروژه لازم داری که به درآمدی که میخوای برسی؟» گفت: «ماهی یکی، نهایتاً سه تا.» گفتم: «خب اگه هر پروژه رو مثلاً ۲۰ تا ۵۰ میلیون بگیری، درآمدت درمیاد دیگه؟» گفت: «آره.» گفتم: «پس نهایتاً سالی ۱۲ تا ۳۶ تا مشتری میخوای.» گفت: «آره.»…
👍26❤8👏4
🖥 اگه هنوز برای آنـلایـن کـردن پـروژههـات با هاست و سرور درگیری، این سایت رو ببین 🖥 سایت Vercel یه پلتفرمه که مخصوصاً برای پروژههای فرانتاند و Next.js خیلی کار رو راحت میکنه 2️⃣ پروژهات رو به GitHub وصل میکنی، 3️⃣ کدت رو Push میکنی، 4️⃣ بعدش Vercel خودش پروژه رو Build و Deploy میکنه و بهت لینک میده 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ❓ داداش چرا استفاده کنیم؟ 💻 بهجای اینکه نصف روز درگیر آپلود فایل، تنظیم سرور و Deploy باشی، تمرکز…
❤26👍2👏2💯1🤩1
⚡️ از دیزاین پترن غول نسازید 💠 دیزاین پترن یعنی یه راهحل آماده برای یه مشکل تکراری یعنـی چـی محمـد: یعنی هر بار که به یه مشکل مشابه میخوری، لازم نیست از صفر فکر کنی همین ...✔️ 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 📝 یه روش امتحانشده داری که میگی: آها، این مشکل رو قبلاً داشتیم؛ اینجوری حلش میکنیم خلاص ☑️ پس دیزاین پترن یعنی: مشکل تکراری → راهحل تکراری و درست #️⃣ #مبانی_پایه ⭐️ @sourceiran
👏20❤4👍3
▫️ چـه افـرادی تـرس از هـوش مصنـوعـی رو ایجـاد کـردن؟ 💬 بررسی تحقیقات چند هفته اخیر در زمینه هوش مصنوعی #️⃣ #هوش_مصنوعی
👏21💯2❤1🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @sourceiran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 502,730 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش برنامه نویسی و طراحی سایت - سورس ایران” (@sourceiran), 21,329 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sourceiran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.