Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,711–29,030 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 14:17
28,748
-30
19 Sept 2026, 02:59
28,778
-21
16 Sept 2026, 15:37
28,799
-1
14 Sept 2026, 16:42
28,800
-11
13 Sept 2026, 03:55
28,811
-11
11 Sept 2026, 07:21
28,822
-20
8 Sept 2026, 10:38
28,842
-19
5 Sept 2026, 03:40
28,861
-10
3 Sept 2026, 08:47
28,871
-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:52
28,872
-7
1 Sept 2026, 05:06
28,879
-5
31 Aug 2026, 05:27
28,884
+2
30 Aug 2026, 05:13
28,882
-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:24
28,885
-1
28 Aug 2026, 00:08
28,886
-13
27 Aug 2026, 03:05
28,899
-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:58
28,901
-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:59
28,903
-3
24 Aug 2026, 03:38
28,906
-6
22 Aug 2026, 13:42
28,912
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.37%
avg views ÷ 28,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.544%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
52 (21 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
40,420
Reactions total
220
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 07:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,760
Videos
≈383
Links
≈1,330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 24s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,120 reactions across 51 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
365
32.6%
❤
335
29.9%
🔥
98
8.75%
👎
82
7.32%
😁
68
6.07%
💔
51
4.55%
🤣
45
4.02%
🍌
25
2.23%
🆒
23
2.05%
🗿
12
1.07%
🤔
10
0.893%
🙈
4
0.357%
🙊
2
0.179%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,191 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✔️ مدلهای جدید هوش مصنوعی که بهجای «حرف زدن»، تصمیم میگیرند!
شرکت TypeSafe AI نسل جدیدی از مدلهای هوش مصنوعی با عنوان System One Models معرفی کرده که هدفشان با مدلهایی مثل ChatGPT و Gemini متفاوت است.
مدلهای زبانی معمولی برای تولید محتوا، کدنویسی و استدلال طراحی شدهاند؛ اما مدلهایی مثل Jev و Laya قرار است تصمیمهای سریع و پرتعداد را مستقیماً داخل نرمافزارها و Agentهای هوش مصنوعی انجام دهند.
مدل Jev اولین …
✔️ شیائومی مدل هوش مصنوعی قدرتمند MiMo-V2.6-Pro را متنباز کرد
شیائومی از مدل جدید MiMo-V2.6-Pro رونمایی کرده؛ یک مدل چندوجهی که قادر به پردازش متن، تصویر، صدا و ویدیو است و از Context تا ۱ میلیون توکن پشتیبانی میکند.
این مدل در شاخص Intelligence مؤسسه Artificial Analysis امتیاز ۴۶ را کسب کرده و در حال حاضر یکی از قدرتمندترین مدلهای Open-Weight محسوب میشود.
نکته جالب، قیمت بسیار پایین API آن است؛ هزینه هر یک می…
✔️ گراک ۴.۷ منتشر شد؛ مدل جدید هوش مصنوعی ایلان ماسک
شرکت xAI رسماً از Grok 4.7 رونمایی کرد؛ مدلی که تمرکز اصلی آن روی برنامهنویسی، کارهای مهندسی و وظایف پیچیده و طولانیمدت است.
در نسخه جدید، مدل با فرایند طولانیتری از یادگیری تقویتی روی مسائلی آموزش دیده که حل آنها ممکن است ساعتها زمان ببرد. گراک ۴.۷ همچنین بهتر میتواند نتیجه کار خودش را بررسی کند و در پروژههای طولانی مسیر حل مسئله را ادامه دهد.
ظرفیت Cont…
✔️ هشدار بحرانی برای کاربران Issabel
آسیبپذیری CVE-2026-89026 با شدت CVSS 9.8 میتواند به مهاجم اجازه دهد بدون Login، با سوءاستفاده از JWT Key ثابت، احراز هویت PBX API را دور زده و به Remote Command Execution (RCE) برسد.
برای این آسیبپذیری PoC عمومی منتشر شده و exploitation واقعی نیز گزارش شده است.
اگر Issabel شما از اینترنت قابل دسترسی است، فوراً Patch کنید و لاگهای PBX API و Asterisk را بررسی کنید.
#Issabel …
✔️ پژوهشگران با کمک کلاد، حساب کارمندان OpenAI را هک کردند!
یک تیم امنیتی موفق شده با کمک هوش مصنوعی کلاد چند آسیبپذیری را شناسایی و به یکدیگر متصل کند و در نهایت به حسابهای ChatGPT و Codex تعدادی از کارکنان OpenAI دسترسی پیدا کند.
پژوهشگران ابتدا با نسخه قبلی کلاد برای ساخت اکسپلویت تلاش کردند اما موفق نشدند؛ با انتشار نسخه جدیدتر، مدل توانست ظرف چند ساعت به ساخت اکسپلویت عملی کمک کند.
پس از تصاحب یکی از حسابه…
✔️ مهندس دیپسیک: شاید هوش مصنوعی تا یک سال دیگر از من بهتر شود!
«لیو شنگیو»، مهندس سیستمهای یادگیری ماشین دیپسیک، در یادداشتی شخصی از سرعت عجیب پیشرفت هوش مصنوعی در حوزه تخصصی خودش گفته است.
به گفته او، هوش مصنوعی طی تنها یک سال از ابزاری ساده برای پیدا کردن مستندات و باگها، به سیستمی رسیده که میتواند کدهای سطح پایین را تحلیل کرده و Kernelهای پردازشی را بهینه کند.
لیو پیشبینی میکند که شاید طی ۶ تا ۱۲ ماه آ…
✔️ باگی که صدها میلیارد دلار برای جهان هزینه داشت!
در کامپیوترهای قدیمی، برای صرفهجویی در حافظه، سال را معمولاً با دو رقم ذخیره میکردند؛ یعنی سال ۱۹۹۹ بهصورت «۹۹» ثبت میشد.
با رسیدن سال ۲۰۰۰، این نگرانی وجود داشت که برخی سیستمها عدد «۰۰» را بهعنوان سال ۱۹۰۰ تشخیص دهند.
این مشکل با نام باگ هزاره شناخته شد و میتوانست سیستمهای بانکی، حملونقل، زیرساختها و سامانههای دولتی را دچار اختلال کند.
برای جلوگیری از…
✔️ مدل هوش مصنوعی جدیدی که بهجای حرف زدن، تصمیم میگیرد!
شرکت TypeSafe AI از مدل جدیدی به نام Jev رونمایی کرده که برخلاف مدلهایی مثل GPT و Claude، برای گفتگو یا تولید متن ساخته نشده؛ وظیفه اصلی آن تصمیمگیری سریع برای نرمافزارها و Agentهای هوش مصنوعی است.
در Jev گزینههای ممکن از قبل مشخص میشوند و مدل مستقیماً تصمیم خود را همراه با احتمال و میزان اطمینان برمیگرداند؛ بدون اینکه مجبور باشد مثل یک LLM، پاسخ را کل…
✔️ هوش مصنوعی Claude ۲۶ درصد از فرایند توسعه آنتروپیک را پیش میبرد
آنتروپیک اعلام کرد که هوش مصنوعی Claude اکنون رهبری ۲۶ درصد از فعالیتهای تحقیق و توسعه هوش مصنوعی این شرکت را بر عهده دارد و در بیش از ۹۰ درصد تحقیقات نیز با انسانها همکاری میکند.
این شرکت همچنین بیان کرد که Claude در هیچیک از بخشهای اندازهگیریشده این فعالیتها بهطور کامل خودمختار عمل نمیکند، اما سهم آن در توسعه این فناوری بهسرعت افزایش ی…
🧠 مغز یک مگس حالا میتواند بازیهای کامپیوتری اجرا کند!
پژوهشگران موفق شدهاند نقشهای بسیار دقیق از مغز و سیستم عصبی مرکزی مگس میوه نر بالغ تهیه کنند؛ شبکهای متشکل از بیش از ۱۶۶ هزار نورون و میلیونها اتصال عصبی.
انتشار این دادهها باعث شده توسعهدهندگان سراغ آزمایش جالبی بروند: استفاده از شبکه عصبی مگس برای کنترل بازیها و محیطهای مجازی.
تا امروز نمونههایی از اجرای Doom، Super Mario 64 و Beat Saber با استفاده ا…
✔️ گزارش آنتروپیک از سوءاستفاده گسترده از Claude
آنتروپیک در گزارش امنیتی جدید خود، موارد متعددی از سوءاستفاده گروهها و نهادهای مختلف در سراسر جهان از Claude را منتشر کرده است.
در بخشی از گزارش، چند عملیات مرتبط با ایران شناسایی شده که از هوش مصنوعی برای تولید و بازنویسی محتوا، تحلیل اطلاعات عمومی و فعالیتهای سایبری استفاده کردهاند.
در پروندهای جداگانه، شبکهای منتسب به MEK/NCRI حدود ۸۴۰۰ پست تلگرام یک فعال وا…
✔️ پژوهشگر ارشد آنتروپیک: احتمال نابودی بشر توسط AI در دهه آینده بیش از ۱۰ درصد است
«ایوان هوبینگر»، سرپرست بخش Alignment Science در شرکت آنتروپیک، در اظهارنظری کمسابقه اعلام کرده که از دید شخصی او، احتمال اینکه هوش مصنوعی طی ۱۰ سال آینده به نابودی تمام انسانها منجر شود، بیش از ۱۰ درصد است.
هوبینگر تأکید کرده که ریسک مدلهای فعلی هوش مصنوعی را پایین میداند و نگرانی اصلی او مربوط به نسلهای آینده و ظهور ابرهوش از…
👍8👎4❤2🍌2
Signed YOUSEF
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @Kaliboys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آموزش شبكه و امنيت @denait · 21,300 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Λ/Organizaτiοn @AOrgan · 47,423 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming @Azad_Developers · 38,012 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Computer Science | علم کامپیوتر @Computer_Science100 · 46,793 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
تولید محتوا |هوش مصنوعی| زنگ دانش @zangedanesh · 59,398 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
ترفند آموزش تکنولوژی و فناوری @CEngineer93 · 101,350 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
خانه موبایل و کامپیوتر @PcAndMob · 24,519 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
کالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی @kali_linuxxx · 75,988 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
مای سکیور | Mysecure @mysecure1 · 29,874 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
مهندسی کامپیوتر @maghalecomputer · 60,357 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Black Security Team @Black_Security · 63,917 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026
آموزش برنامه نویسی و هوشمصنوعی | Max academy @max_academy · 70,235 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Computer Help @P30_H3LP · 25,238 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
‹ NetWork & Security › @DrSecCom · 36,720 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
کتابخانه انگلیسی من🎧😍 @EnglishAudioLibrary · 41,813 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
لذت الکترونیک @elecz · 52,588 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر | رفع مشکلات کامپیوتری @tamirpc_com · 22,963 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
کافه مهندس @cofeeng · 113,105 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Computer & IT Engineering @Computer_IT_Engineering · 188,764 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
جزوه بازان | JozveBazan @jozve_bazan · 24,875 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
Full Package | فول پکیج @FullPackage · 29,196 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
آموزش نوین مقاله نویسی با هوش مصنوعی @tephd · 76,822 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
مرکز آموزش کامپیوتر @AmoozeshWebsite · 96,193 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
دنیای علم و تکنولوژی @Tech_Sci · 35,965 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 93 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کالی بویز | ترفند | تکنولوژی” (@Kaliboys), 28,748 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaliboys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.