Channel
@ipotekasem
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,558subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001768510342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ipotekasem |
| Created | 21 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ipotekasem |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
19,700 average views per post against 5,558 subscribers — an engagement rate of 355.3%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 21 of 21 published in the window (12 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 414,697 |
| Mature posts only | 372.9% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 5,558 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8% |
| Position in cohort | 99.928th percentile · 25.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.113% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 5,558 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 5,569 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 5,579 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,580 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 5,580 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (22 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 414,697 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 12 | 32.4% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 18.9% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 5.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♟«Ход конём» по шахматному полю льгот Марат Хуснуллин впервые честно признал, почему правительство перенесло изменения по семейной ипотеке: «Риски большие. Не можем до конца просчитать последствия, к чему приведет перерасчет». При этом изначально реформу обещали с 1 июля, потом — с 1 августа, теперь — с октября. Каждый раз — новая дата, каждый раз — новые оправдания. На самом деле Хуснуллин сказал правду, но не всю…
🏡Россияне не верят банкам, но верят друзьям Похоже, в России возвращается советская традиция: брать жильё коллективно. Исследование ГК «Гранель» показало: 33% россиян готовы объединяться с друзьями или родственниками, чтобы купить квартиру. 21% рассматривают такой вариант как инвестицию, 8% доверяют только родне, а 4% согласны даже на друзей, но только с юристом. Причина банальна: ипотека под 20%. Когда банк просит…
🪖 «Владимир Путин — главный строитель России», — Марат Хуснуллин ⭐️ Марат Хуснуллин, вице-премьер на праздновании «Дня строителя» в Лужниках: К нашей отрасли все время приковано внимание нашего Президента Владимира Владимировича Путина. Я постоянно ему докладываю, он постоянно в курсе всех наших дел. Он знает, что мы делаем и к чему мы идем. Давайте мы еще раз поздравим нашего президента с Днем строителя. Он главн…
🤡11
Депутат Госдумы Даванков, громко смеясь, ответил на вопрос, как взять ипотеку при зарплате 60-70 тысяч рублей в месяц. Смеялся он долго, очень долго. Над нами всеми.
🤬9👍1
🩶Россияне тонут в ипотечных долгах За первое полугодие 2026 года объём просроченной задолженности по ипотеке на готовое жильё достиг 230 млрд рублей: плюс 21% за шесть месяцев, или 40 млрд новых неплатежей. Доля проблемных кредитов в портфеле выросла с 1,16% до 1,33%. На первый взгляд, процент небольшой. Но если учесть, что общий портфель ипотеки в стране — 23 трлн рублей, а за год просрочка выросла на 116% , то ста…
👍5
💵Риелторам хотят запретить зарабатывать на чужой беде МВД, ФСБ и Генпрокуратура решили, что риелторы должны нести ответственность не только за подбор квартиры, но и за юридическую судьбу сделки. Они предложили создать механизм, по которому агентам по недвижимости придётся возвращать свою комиссию, если суд признает сделку недействительной. Инициатива вошла в обсуждение третьего пакета антифрод-мер. Поводом стало изм…
👍1
🧐Рыночная ипотека берёт своё Рынок жилья серьезно трансформируется после изменений в льготных программах. Доля стандартных кредитов (без льгот) достигла максимума за последние два года. Люди вынуждены брать займы под высокие проценты, так как льготы стали менее доступны. Выдачи по «Семейной ипотеке» составили 116 млрд рублей (это почти половина всех выданных кредитов). В лидерах по популярности этой программы — Аст…
👁Квартирный вопрос под надзором военкомата Рынок недвижимости в России столкнулся с новым негласным правилом. Крупнейшие игроки, такие как федеральная сеть агентств «Этажи», начали запрашивать у своих клиентов (продавцов и покупателей в возрасте от 18 до 65 лет) выписку из Реестра повесток. Реакция риэлторов понятна: с мая, по новым законам, если военнообязанный не явился в военкомат в течение 20 дней после получен…
📊Рынок сделал россиян беднее в 4 раза Средняя стоимость студии в московской новостройке достигла 17,9 миллиона рублей. Пять лет назад, в июле 2021-го, она стоила 8,8 миллиона. Рост — ровно в два раза. Но это ещё цветочки. Ежемесячный платёж по рыночной ипотеке на 20 лет с первым взносом 20% вырос с 60,2 тысячи до 228,7 тысячи рублей. Почти в четыре раза. Почему так? Средняя ставка по ипотеке поднялась с 8,3% до 18…
🤬3
❌Россияне объявили бойкот ипотеке За первое полугодие 2026 года число сделок по покупке жилья за собственные средства превысило 200 тысяч, что на 26,5% больше, чем год назад. На первичном рынке прирост и вовсе дикий: 63,6%. Казалось бы, народ разбогател. Но нет. На самом деле всё ровно наоборот. Ипотека в России окончательно перестала быть инструментом доступности. В начале 2026 года заёмщикам выдавали кредиты под…
🐎Ипотечный «бум» перед дедлайном Центробанк опубликовал отчет по ипотеке за июнь, и цифры отлично иллюстрируют главную эмоцию рынка — «успеть до закрытия». Очевидно, что все побежали оформлять кредиты, ожидая серьезных правок в условиях льготных программ. Всего было выдано льготной ипотеки на 482,7 млрд рублей (оформлено 101,3 тысячи сделок). В сравнении с маем — это резкий скачок: +34,9% по количеству сделок и +4…
👻Загородные замки для призраков За первое полугодие 2026 года предложение элитной загородной недвижимости в Москве и Подмосковье выросло на 31%. На рынок вывели 715 лотов — от коттеджей до таунхаусов. Казалось бы, бум. Но есть нюанс: спросом новые объекты не пользуются. Девелоперы строят, а покупатели — не приходят. Средняя цена коттеджа премиум-класса — 217 млн рублей, таунхауса — 71 млн. На эти деньги можно купит…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ipotekasem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 455,313 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дело семейное. Ипотека” (@ipotekasem), 5,558 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipotekasem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.