Channel
@razrussia
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,494subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003889305368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razrussia |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razrussia |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
70,600 average views per post against 2,494 subscribers — an engagement rate of 2832.5%. Across the 51,640 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.2% and 34.6%, with a median of 19.5%.
| Window | 30 days (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,342,210 |
| Mature posts only | 2832.5% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,494 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:rus · 51,640 channels · p10 5.20% · p25 10.2% · p50 19.5% · p75 34.6% · p90 55.3% |
| Position in cohort | 99.998th percentile · 145.4× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.129% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 2,494 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 2,496 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 2,494 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 2,498 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 2,498 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,342,210 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
173 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 29 | 16.8% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 11.6% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 11.0% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 9.83% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 8.09% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 5.78% | |
| 🤨 | 8 | 4.62% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 4.05% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 3.47% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.47% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.578% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇺 Сцена в Кэмп-Дэвиде, где Трамп потребовал от главы Пентагона отчета о внезапно обнаружившемся дефиците ракет, стала публичным проявлением системного кризиса. Судя по утечкам, американский президент искренне полагал, что проблема с боеприпасами, которые планировалось пустить по Ирану, «уже решена». Однако реальность оказалась жестче: затяжной конфликт с Тегераном выжег стратегические запасы. Речь идет о качественно…
👍1
🇷🇺 Власти возобновили борьбу с VPN 🗣 Минцифры переходит к тотальной «зачистке» интернета. Под предлогом безопасности вводятся новые меры контроля, которые фактически оставляют пользователям лишь узкий коридор из государственных и банковских сервисов. Параллельно западные IT-гиганты ставят крест на российских разработчиках, лишая их глобального рынка. 👀 Конец «серой зоны» Минцифры запускает механизм, который оконча…
🤯11🤨8😨5
🇷🇺 Киев бьет по союзникам и гражданским 🗣 Украинские БПЛА атаковали турецкий сухогруз с фруктами и овощами у берегов Новороссийска. Это лишь один из эпизодов новой тактики: вслед за нефтебазами и складами Wildberries горят продуктовые хабы «Ленты». Теперь под ударом оказывается не логистика, а гражданское население и его повседневные потребности - от еды до электроники. 🟡 Цель - мирное население Семь украинских др…
🤯4👍2👏1
🇷🇺 Дефицит бюджета заставил властей всерьез взяться за налоговые льготы, которые годами были священной коровой для бизнеса. Минфин и ФНС синхронно ужесточают правила игры, подключая к тотальному контролю цифровую систему «Налог-3». Речь идет о резидентах ТОР и ОЭЗ, где льготы по налогу на прибыль и страховым взносам обходятся казне в десятки миллиардов рублей ежегодно. Идея проста: если компания получает преференции,…
🤡1
🇷🇺 Сбербанк ухудшил прогноз: бюджетная дыра увеличилась до 3 трлн рублей 🗣 Крупнейший госбанк страны последовательно пересматривает свои макроэкономические ожидания в сторону ухудшения. Вслед за снижением прогноза по росту ВВП до 0-0,5% и повышением ожиданий по инфляции до 6,5-7%, Сбербанк фиксирует системные проблемы в качестве кредитного портфеля и ликвидности, предупреждая о неизбежности нового налогового давлени…
😁5
🇷🇺 Конец ЕАЭС: Ереван переходит в наступление на Москву 🗣 Отношения между Россией и Арменией стремительно деградируют, переходя из фазы холодного безразличия в стадию открытого экономического противостояния. Премьер-министр Армении Никол Пашинян официально пригрозил крахом Евразийского экономического союза, если Москва не снимет ограничения на поставки товаров. Одновременно Ереван выдвигает России неприемлемые финан…
👏7👎1
🇷🇺 День громких дел. Сегодняшняя оперативная сводка из залов судов и следственных изоляторов пестрит фамилиями, которые еще вчера казались неприкасаемымb/ В центре внимания - арест замначальника управления беспилотных систем Минпромторга Аллы Половчени, которая, по версии следствиz. организовала схему по закупке китайских БПЛА для проекта «Транспорт будущего» с последующей перемаркировкой и выдачей за отечественные р…
💯11
🇷🇺 Конец эпохи «цифрового нейтралитета» 🗣 ФСБ предъявила основателю Telegram Павлу Дурову обвинение в содействии терроризму и заявила о намерении объявить его в международный розыск. Поводом стала не просто неуступчивость администрации мессенджера, а ее отказ удалять ресурсы, которые, по версии следствия, использовались украинскими спецслужбами для вербовки россиян и координации диверсий. Однако юридические последст…
🤡5👎2
🇷🇺 БПЛА уничтожают малый бизнес и бюджет 🗣 Удары по складам Wildberries обернулись крахом для всей российской экономики. Под угрозой не только товары селлеров, но и налоговые поступления, а также стабильность малого бизнеса, который взял на себя кредитные обязательства. 🟡 Налоговый пепел Потери бюджета, что уже признали в Кремле, становятся неизбежными: когда товары горят, бизнес лишается оборотных средств. Предпр…
💯5👎2👍1🤔1
🇷🇺 Запад уже давно перешел все разумные границы, заявляя, что поставки вооружений и разведданные Киеву - это «не участие в конфликте». При этом спутниковые снимки НАТО позволяют ВСУ в реальном времени наводить ракеты на российские города и энергообъекты, а западные инструкторы фактически управляют ударами по территории РФ. Но когда встает вопрос о симметричном ответе, внезапно просыпается озабоченность «эскалацией». …
🤡8👍6👏4👎1💯1
🇷🇺 Крымский курортный сезон проигрывает битву за туриста 🗣 По данным Ассоциации туроператоров России, российские туроператоры в июне вернули своим клиентам за отмену путешествий в Крым порядка ₽1,5 млрд - это почти 30 тыс. путевок. Россияне отказываются посещать полуостров из-за дефицита топлива и регулярных атак. 🔵 Фактор накопленного эффекта Отказ от Крыма в июне продемонстрировал не столько реакцию на текущий м…
🇷🇺 Не проходит и дня, чтобы украинские дроны не выводили из строя какой-нибудь складской комплекс Wildberries или очередной НПЗ. Удары участились, и причиной этому может быть желание Киева создать системный кризис в одном из ключевых сегментов российского потребительского рынка, который затронет миллионы граждан. Вчера атакам подверглись санкт-петербургские логистические комплексы в Шушарах и Уткиной заводи, склады в…
🤔4🤣3🗿1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @razrussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 65,602 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Разумная Россия 2.0” (@razrussia), 2,494 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razrussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.