Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НАКОКОЙ объектив снято?

@nakokoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

426subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470276652
TypeChannel
Username@nakokoi
Created8 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nakokoi

Growth

426427426.56 August 2026 — 427 subscribers6 August 2026 — 427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 426 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 426–427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:58426-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:30427no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:43427first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 426 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held14 (17 May 202623 July 2026)
Views total620
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC106 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @vsperform

📢 OPEN CALL / ВАКАНСИИ VSP 1) Менеджеры артистов У нас есть несколько супер перспективных коллективов и артистов. У лейбла есть все ресурсы — нужна помощь по контролю за артистами и реализацией всех планов по стратегии продвижения и осуществлению продакшена Обязательно быть стрессоустойчивым и иметь долгую волю. С художниками бывает сложно работать 2) Event-менеджер, организатор концертов Наши топ коллективы хо

22 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC147 viewsread 6 August 2026

Нил Боомкамп, режиссёр очень нашумевшего в своё время Района №9, напромптил короткий метр на 100% в AI. Сюжет "такое себе", но тем не менее это очередное proof of concept (доказательство концепции) и демонстрация возможностей инструмента. https://youtu.be/8Wbtt2JxP7g

21 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC145 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @video_tipsVideo

Не мог не поделиться, этим музыкальным клипом, с куевой тучей отсылок к хорошим фильмам. Да еще и грамотно приправленных. Вроде просто, но со вкусом и пару раз приятно улыбнуло Ссылка на вимео, для ценителей RICH THE KID - CALL ME

16 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC222 viewsread 6 August 2026

Вчера случайно наткнулся на клип старой песни Imagine Dragons, который я никогда не видел. Next to me. Очень классно сделано. На разрыв. Чтобы комок в горле. Монтаж классный. https://youtu.be/Txlk7PiHaGk

10 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC246 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#мемесы Для съёмок тоже подходит

8 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC231 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kotkrasnyPhoto

Вот прошла сегодня большая новость: «Швабе» представил первый российский анаморфотный кинообъектив на «Иннопром-2026» и тут как всегда не совсем первый, не совсем Швабе, а есть конкретные люди и гигантская работа 1-2 человек ... и много чего еще о чем как нибудь потом, но факт что то что начиналось как проект Lorentz Lens оживает - сборка идет! Вот фото за год :) ну и маленький инсайд из первых рук так сказать:

7 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC210 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда ты садишься за ИИ и думаешь быстренько сделать себе простенькое управление проектом, но в итоге создаёшь какую-то Неведомую Ё*анную Херню с оркестраторами, агентами, провайдерами, гейтвеями и моделями. Я режиссёр, я не хочу никаких таких слов, я хочу немножко денюжек и аплодисментов.

7 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC214 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На текущий момент соотношение дизлайков к лайкам практически 10 к 1. Лично для меня это скорее всего положительно скажется на фильме - тотальное занижение ожиданий. Идёшь в кинотеатр смотреть полный отстой и вдруг - ой, чо в целом-то прикольно! Да, понятное дело повесточный каст, много исторической клюквы, но в теории это всё равно не мешает сделать хороший фильм.

29 Jun 2026, 16:39 UTC291 viewsread 6 August 2026

Чел сделал плагин за $14 для Davinci, который тречит ваше время проведённое за проектами. Удобно для тех, кто монтирует/красит/компоузит и берёт деньги либо за час работы, либо за смену. В обычной жизни, ты обычно сильно занижаешь этот показатель. Тут же учитывается абсолютно всю. В целом, думаю, такое можно навайбкодить и самому, но вдруг кому пригодится. https://youtu.be/hPOm9HM6S_o

13 Jun 2026, 11:10 UTC329 viewsread 6 August 2026

Был вчера на кинотусовке. Сергей Мокрицкий рассказал прикольную историю. Он снял фильм про революцию на Кубе. На Кубе, понимаете? Ром, сигары, Гавана, вот это вот всё. В итоге из него вырезали все сцены, где курят, пьют и где есть кровь.

10 Jun 2026, 19:33 UTC333 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У Мадонны вышел нуднейший 14 минутный клип вместе с псиопом на тему того, что это ПРОРЫВ. Помимо самоповторов, там есть латексные девушки со стедикамами и кардебалет, который вставил себе в письки-попки лазерные указки (буквально). И наш постмодернистский мозг начинает не понимать: это лютый кринж или это реально офигенно и смело. Чтобы разобраться в этом вопросе я проделал один мыслительный эксперимент и заменил

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @nakokoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 632,246 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАКОКОЙ объектив снято?” (@nakokoi), 426 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nakokoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.