Channel
@UncleBerik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
531subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001492399781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UncleBerik |
| Description | Канал здравого смысла.❗️Реклама +рубрика #нампишут на эл. адрес uncleBerIk@gmail.com |
| Created | 25 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UncleBerik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 531 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 531 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
47 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 63.8% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2022 to 19 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Работа будет выглядеть следующим образом: 1. Вы пишите мне в личное сообщение t.me/uncIeBerIk слово «Готов» и Ваш начальный банк. К примеру - "готов, 100 тыс" 2. Я даю инструкцию по работе и веду вас лично под своим руководством до момента вывода средств. 3. Пополняете свой личный баланс 4. Я провожу вас по алгоритму, делаем х6-х10 5. Делаете вывод средств 6. Платите мне 15% от чистой прибыли Далее работаем повторн…
😁8👍7
Внимание ⚠️ Я не прошу у Вас деньги вперёд, ничего не продаю и тем более не предоставляю платный доступ в приват. Мне абсолютно не интересны деньги, которые вы заработали без моей помощи. Повторюсь, мне вы переводите 15% с чистой прибыли, только после того, как заработали ВЕРНУ НАЧАЛЬНЫЙ ДЕПОЗИТ В СЛУЧАЕ НЕУДАЧИ, НО С НАМИ ТОЛЬКО УДАЧА! Все что нужно от вас - действовать под нашим руководством, выводя деньги на сво…
😁2
Старт в 17:00 по Москве! Делайте закреп канала, будет полезно Проект запускается в сотрудничестве с лучшими трейдерами Бурятии!
😁2
Друзья, осталось немного! Дожимаем, такую бешеную информацию не могу выдать на средний актив! Не забывайте включить уведомления и закрепить канал в избранных! Готов с вами поспорить на подписку в канале, что это не какой-то всплеск, информация реально стоящая, такого нигде и никогда не было и не будет! Если бы я был своим подписчиком и знал что меня ждёт – давно отложил бы все дела и занялся непосредственно этим!
😁2👍1
Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁1
Давно хотели запустить проект на актуальную сегодня тему - Инвестиции В течении дня дам всю инфу
О, я помню, как раскручивали журналистку Гармажапову. Очередную талантливую самородку. Все эти либеральные девы - Винокурова, Баронова, Гармажапова сбивались в кучки и обожали друг друга. Гармажапова теперь работает на спецслужбы США, судя по всему. И раскачивает ситуацию в Бурятии. Надеюсь, уголовное дело заведено? Тут, по ходу, измена Родине, сепаратизм и прочее на много лет.
👍6
В очередной раз со смехом читаю, как уехавшие из страны фантазируют насчет распада России. того, что они станут строить на её обломках. Ну что ж, придётся написать очевидное 1) Россия не просто не разваливается — она расширяется на 4 больших региона, и это происходит сейчас. За эти 4 региона плюс еще парочку опционально она готова платить очень высокую цену. Такую, какую никому из вас просто не перебить. 2) Нынешн…
👍9👏2
Фейк. Никаких проблем с мобилизацией в районе не было. Но задумаемся, народ. Нас, наши имена, нашу Тунку ИСПОЛЬЗУЮТ. Используют нехорошие люди. Почему они вообще это могут сделать? Потому что мира в Тунке с 2016 года нет. Мы объединяемся только когда наступает война или бедствие. Потому-что пять лет несправедливости и социального напряжения даром не прошли. Потому-что семена зла, брошенные в землю американским наймит…
👍3
Дорогие тункинцы! Виктория Маладаева, из числа американских наймитов, распространяет по всему миру, что тункинские буряты - трусы и предатели. С какой целью она это делает? Внушить страх, растерянность беспомощность в наших мужчин, во всех жителей Тункинской долины? Вчитаемся в эти строки. От первого до последнего слова - ЛОЖЬ. ДЕЗИНФОРМАЦИЯ. Во-первых. Стало известно, что Денис Шалдушкеев, глава Зун-Мурино, с…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @UncleBerik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2022 to 19 September 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,055,951 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UncleBerik named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Приемная дяди Баира” (@UncleBerik), 531 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UncleBerik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.