📕هفت هزار سالگان @abcdef123456_Hafthezarsalegan 💎معرفی برترین کانالهای تلگرام: 🔹هماهنگی جهت تبادل: @mrsmafd

Channel
نویسندگی
@ErnestMillerHemingway
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,044subscribers
+1,475 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001319434766 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ErnestMillerHemingway |
| Description | نقد ادبی ایران مرکز مطالعات ادبی ایران آموزش اصول داستاننویسی، نقد ادبی، برگزاری دورهها و کارگاههایی نویسندگی و نشر داستانهای کوتاه و داستانک |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ErnestMillerHemingway |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 30,044 | +193 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 29,851 | +81 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 29,770 | +162 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 29,608 | -55 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 29,663 | +23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 29,640 | +153 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 29,487 | +71 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 29,416 | -67 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 29,483 | +130 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:46 | 29,353 | +126 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 29,227 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 29,231 | +52 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 29,179 | -33 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 29,212 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 29,245 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:29 | 29,261 | +134 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 29,127 | +53 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 29,074 | -35 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 29,109 | +52 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 29,057 | first reading |
Engagement
110 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.24%
- avg views ÷ 30,044 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 374
- 43 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 110 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 110 (16 February 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,066 |
| Reactions total | 135 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 687
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
611 reactions across 52 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 424 | 69.4% | |
| 👍 | 101 | 16.5% | |
| 👏 | 46 | 7.53% | |
| 👌 | 20 | 3.27% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.31% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.982% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.655% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.327% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
هرکدوم رو بیشتر دوست دارید انتخاب کنید؛ هدیهها از طرف ما و کاملاً رایگاناند 🎁✨
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔴به مناسبت ۲ ساله شدن عمر چنلمون چنل های vip که قیمت یک میلیون هست به ۱۰ نفر اول رایگان میدیم و بعد از ۱۰ نفر به طور خودکار لینک باطل میشه جوین بدین🆕🤩🤩 ⛓https://t.me/addlist/rVkjITKQws40ZDU0 #تبلیغ_نیست 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
هزینه ورود 1000,000 تومان رایگان فقط تا 10 دقیقه⚡️☝️☝️
🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 لیستی از بهترین کانال های تلگرام که محتوای پولی رو به صورت رایگان در اختیار شما میزارم 👌👇 🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵
.
👏1
🏺🏺🏺 💎معرفی برترین کانالهای تلگرام: ✨ نبض رابطه |با خودت، با رابطهات، آگاهانهتر باش @Nbzrbt 🔹هماهنگی جهت تبادل: @mrsmafd
❤1
🎯 فروش ویژه «پکیج صوتی آموزش داستاننویسی» با تخفیف ویژه فقط تا مدت محدود. هزینه هر پکیج آموزشی همراه تخفیف فقط ۲۵۰هزار تومان. همراه پشتیبان ویژه جهت پاسخگویی به سؤالاتی که هنرآموز با آن مواجه میشود. با در اختیارداشتن این پکیج آموزش داستاننویسی با مفاهیم و عناصر داستاننویسی از قبیل: چیستی و تفاوت داستان کوتاه و بلند و رمان و قصه و حکایت و افسانه و...، انواع دیدگاههاو زاویههای دید در داستاننویسی، انواع تعل…
❤10
✨ اگر به دنبال دسترسی به معتبر ترین کانال های تلگرامی هستید، متن را لمس کرده و وارد شوید. 🔵
🔵 جامع ترین بانک PDF کتابها، جزوات و ویدئو های آموزشی دانشگاهی، کنکوری🌝
📖 بانک جامع pdf کتاب های نایاب 🎓 فلسفه تحلیلی، تاریخ فلسفه و فلسفه علم 🌐 اخبار و تحلیل سیاسی ایران و جهان ⭐️برای ورود، متن را لمس کنید یا روی لینک مربوطه کلیک نمایید.⭐️
🔴 امشب آخرین مهلت ثبتنام این دوره است. فقط با مطالعهی جمعی، بحثوفحص، و نقد و نقّادی میتوان حکومتهای جبّار و مستبد را بهزیر کشید؛ و نه با هیچ روش دیگر. - هانا آرنت
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @ErnestMillerHemingway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ErnestMillerHemingway edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 23 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@kafeh_honar31 · 2,5692 postsترنج~نام من عشق است آیا میشناسیدم؟~
@toranjam_7 · 7862 postsهفت هزار سالگان
@abcdef123456_Hafthezarsalegan · 3,5781 postڪــافــه مــتــن و شـعـر↜ː𝐒𝐀𝐁𝐎
@caffee_sabo · 6,9681 postFarin_ebook
@farin_ebook · 16,7981 postܢܚ݅ܫܝ و ܥܭܠܩܘ
@ghazalkhaniiii · 9411 postH.R.A
@Hamidrezaabravan · 4,9531 postذکرهای شگفت انگیز
@jazbaramashh · 4,2701 postنبض رابطه
@Nbzrbt · 621 post🥂❥ ࡄߊܦ߳ܨ ܝ᪴ܝܝߺܫر❥
@Saghiye_Sher · 22,1001 post✍ نویسندهّ تک شات
@shotnote1 · 6,5071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ghalambedastan · 3,535#1
@anahelanjoman · 6,630#2
@Writing_lovers · 2,688#3
@choobakk · 6,188#4
@saranjoman · 3,835#5
@ka_koohikar · 12,548#6
@ahleneveshtan · 6,343#7
@shahinkalantari · 20,366#8
@yaddashtbardari · 807#9
@nimabamdadi · 3,144#10
@NazariyehAdabi · 42,738#11
@kierkegaard3 · 18,910#12
@mitrajajarmy · 1,326#13
@historyandmyths · 469#14
@asalhfarahami · 381 (as read 8 September 2026)#15
@fiction_12 · 7,630#16
@nahidabdilearning · 3,357#17
@NaghdAdabiann · 874#18
@benevis_s · 18,356#19
@goftgoftam · 1,239#20
@B_F_Art · 747 (as read 8 September 2026)#21
@writingforchange · 339#22
@nevisandegikhallagh · 7,381#23
@anbar100 · 28,788#24
@irCDS · 19,266#25
@RavanShenasy_Zard · 1,397#26
@ArtsandCulturee · 2,404#27
@dastane_shiraz · 1,393#28
@humanismpsychology · 18,841#29
@ChoobakSotiKetabkhane · 3,731#30
@Morteza_Abbasi_g · 395#31
@tabrizschoolofpersianpainting · 6,265#32
@Avangardmag · 3,428#33
@medivent · 11,027#34
@DrNematallahFazeli · 8,204#35
@afarineshdastan · 2,057#36
@dastanirani2 · 2,068#37
@naghddastan · 1,149#38
@mahfel_khoban_sheeer · 5,435#39
@rnmagz · 3,178#40
@OneThousandandOnePodcast · 32,723#41
@Donye_Khakestari · 7,147#42
@bmdteam · 109#43
@navaye_del_ma · 2,393#44
@TarikhHonarNaghashi · 6,001#45
@vaj_hay_eshgh · 9,406#46
@choobakke · 4,058#47
@khaneibarayedastan · 556#48
@mehrandousti · 7,956#49
@bidarschool · 5,401#50
@BashgaheAdabiyat · 41,199#51
@bankema · 32,263#52
@kanoondastanchaharshanbehrasht · 1,452#53
@GalileAstronomy · 3,726#54
@ghessekade · 563#55
@TheWeepingMeadow · 2,144#56
@zibaishenasi · 19,572#57
@smnejatihosseini · 605#58
@Everythingaboutphotography · 13,187#59
@Iranartists · 11,675#60
@baangnews · 1,152#61
@nutqiyyat · 30,043#62
@Cognitive_Linguistics_Institute · 4,547#63
@sparrow_is_typing · 1,542#64
@tabarshenasi_ketab · 4,255#65
@hesam_ipakchi · 8,192#66
@gozinguye · 4,574#67
@Archivesbahram · 6,062#68
@noqalam · 3,703#69
@Philosophy_files · 29,893#70
@virastaar · 10,273#71
@Phwandering · 1,347#72
@freekargah · 6,745#73
@tavoosimsaeed · 2,468#74
@madrasefalsafe · 6,008#75
@Bahram_Beyzai · 2,899#76
@iranian_teb · 6,329#77
@Land_of_Analysis · 707 (as read 8 September 2026)#78
@mana_ravanbod · 4,796#79
@Ghazalak1 · 5,381#80
@bigsleepsblog · 1,468#81
@KETAB_KHANE_HOBAB · 4,963#82
@hanieholiaie5 · 197#83
@sociologydisasters · 322#84
@CovidPapers · 1,117 (as read 8 September 2026)#85
@SeenArtCompany · 948#86
@nojom3 · 674#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@OneThousandandOnePodcast · 32,723
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
@anbar100 · 28,788
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@ketabegoia · 32,514
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
@LibraryinternationaL · 20,715
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
@ensanak · 31,479
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@shahinkalantari · 20,366
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نویسندگی” (@ErnestMillerHemingway), 30,044 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ErnestMillerHemingway.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.