Channel
@TarikhHonarNaghashi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,038subscribers
+126 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001019599291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TarikhHonarNaghashi |
| Description | 🏛️ دایرهالمعارف تصویری تاریخ هنر نقاشی 🖌شناخت سبکها و مکاتب هنری (از غارنشینی تا معاصر) 🖌معرفی نوابغ دنیای رنگ و فرم 🖌تجزیه و تحلیل شاهکارهای هنری جهان |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TarikhHonarNaghashi |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:59 | 6,038 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:58 | 6,034 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 6,032 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 6,029 | +9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 6,020 | +7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 6,013 | +4 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 6,009 | +5 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 6,004 | +3 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 6,001 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 5,981 | +7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 5,974 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 5,969 | +9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 5,960 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 5,950 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 5,947 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 5,944 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 5,937 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 5,929 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 5,924 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 5,920 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (23 December 2025 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,538 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Pablo Picasso and Brigitte Bardot at La Californie, Picasso’s villa in Cannes, 1956. پابلو پیکاسو و بریژیت باردو در لا کالیفرنی، ویلای پیکاسو در کن، 1956. بریژیت باردو برای نهمین جشنواره فیلم کن به فرانسه آمد. مستند 78 دقیقه ای هانری ژرژ کلوزو به نام راز پیکاسو (Le Mystère Picasso) نیز در این جشنواره به نمایش درآمد. بریژیت باردو بیست و یک ساله در لا کالیفرنی به دنیای پابلو پیکاسو قدم گذاشت، خانه و کارگاهش مشرف به…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
ده نقاشی مهم از سبک سورئالیسم @TarikhHonarNaghashi
دقایقی کوتاه درباره ی پل سزان، از تاثیرگذارترین نقاشان سبک پستامپرسیونیسم فرانسه ▪️سزان کسی است که پیکاسو او را پدر همهی هنرمندان میداند و هایدگر درباره ی او میگوید: کاش میشد آنگونه که سزان نقاشی میکرد، فکر کرد. @TarikhHonarNaghashi
من به جنبهی عقلانی علاقه دارم، اگرچه واژهی «عقل» را دوست ندارم. به باور من «عقل» واژهای بسیار خشک است، بسیار گنگ. من واژهی «باور» را دوست دارم. فکر میکنم به طور کلی زمانی که مردم میگویند «میدانم»، نمیدانند، آنها باور دارند. بر این باورم که هنر تنها شکل فعالیت است که در آن انسان به مثابهی انسان نشان میدهد که فردی راستین است. تنها در هنر است که او مستعد گام نهادن به آن سوی مرزهای ویژگی حیوانی است، از آن رو که…
فيلمى كه اين اثر هاپر را زنده كرده است.
او آثارش ظاهرى ساده دارند... اما حالت كاراكترها، نگاهشان و تركيب بندى آثارش دست به دست مى دهند تا حسى غريب را در بيننده ايجاد كنند.
▪️تحلیل بصری نقاشی ▫️کتاب «مدیریت چشم مخاطب»، اثر محمدحسین نیرومند نقاشی مشهور Sacrifice of Isaac اثر برجسته Caravaggio داستان حضرت ابراهیم که به امر خداوند قرار است سر اسماعیل (اسحاق) پسرش را ذبح کند، اما فرشتهای از طرف خداوند گوسفندی میآورد توجه کنید هنرمند چگونه چشم مخاطب را مدیریت میکند: چشم نخست بهدلیل نور بیشتر و همینطور جهت خوانش که معمولاً از چپ بالا شروع میشود، پس مخاطب فرشته را میبیند سپس بهدلیل …
Caravaggio 1986 Director: DerekJarman «کاراواجو» نه یک زندگینامه متعارف، بلکه بازآفرینی شاعرانه روح و جهانبینی نقاش بزرگ باروک است. درک جارمن با کنار هم نشاندن عناصر متعلق به دورههای مختلف تاریخی، آگاهانه از بازسازی صرف فاصله میگیرد. آنچه بر پرده شکل میگیرد، بیش از روایت زندگی کاراواجو، تجربهای است از زیستن در دل یکی از بومهای نقاشی او. زبان بصری فیلم مستقیماً از نقاشیهای کاراواجو الهام میگیرد. نور و تاریک…
Photo, posted without a caption
نگاهی به رنگهایی که دیگر هرگز ساخته نمیشوند. امروزه بیشتر رنگهایی که در اختیار هنرمندان و طراحان قرار دارند، با فرمولهای ایمن و مهندسیشده تولید میشوند. اما تاریخ رنگ، داستانی بسیار متفاوت دارد؛ داستانی از مواد سمی، ترکیبات عجیب و حتی معضلات اخلاقی. پشت درخشش پوست در آثار ورمیر و قرمزهای چشمگیر و رازگونهٔ ونگوگ، دنیایی از شیمی خطرناک و رنگدانههایی نهفته بود که امروزه دیگر جایی در صنعت رنگ ندارند. در این مجموع…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @TarikhHonarNaghashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر بفهمید تابلوی محبوبی که سالها در موزه بوده، یک "کپیِ بینقص" است و نسخه اصلی نیست، آیا ارزش هنری آن در نظر شما تغییر میکند؟
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تاریخ هنر نقاشی | Art History of Painting” (@TarikhHonarNaghashi), 6,038 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TarikhHonarNaghashi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.