Channel
@tabarshenasi_ketab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,094subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001244728785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tabarshenasi_ketab |
| Created | 29 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tabarshenasi_ketab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 4,094 | +17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 4,077 | +16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 4,061 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 4,050 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 4,037 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 4,031 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 August 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,111 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
دفاع از نظریههای رهاییبخش چگونه فلسفه انسان را از زندان حقیقتها آزاد میکند؟ ✍سینا جهاندیده تاریخ فلسفه را معمولاً تاریخ کشف حقیقت میدانند؛ اما میتوان آن را از زاویهای دیگر نیز خواند: تاریخ رهایی انسان. بسیاری از نظریههای بزرگ فلسفی، پیش از آنکه توصیفی از جهان باشند، واکنشی به صورتهای گوناگون سلطه بودهاند. آنها تنها نمیخواستند حقیقت را توضیح دهند؛ میخواستند انسان را از حقیقتهایی آزاد کنند که خود به ابزار…
Photo, posted without a caption
از «لوح سفید» جان لاک تا «لوح سپید» استیون پینکر تبارشناسی یک ایده ✍سینا جهاندیده بعضی کتابها فقط خوانده نمیشوند؛ تاریخ را تغییر میدهند. «جستاری در خصوص فاهمهی بشری» اثر جان لاک از همین کتابهاست. لاک در این اثر، با طرح ایدهی «لوح سفید» استدلال میکند که ذهن انسان هنگام تولد فاقد ایدههای ذاتی است و معرفت از تجربه شکل میگیرد. در نگاه نخست، این نظریه صرفاً بحثی در معرفتشناسی به نظر میرسد، اما پیامدهای آن بسیا…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed سینا جهاندیده
روشنگری آهنگ آن کرد که اکاذیب و اساطیر را ویران کند، و به پیروزی حقیقت و آزادی یاری رساند، اما پس از آنکه ویرانکاریاش به سر آمد، ناگزیر از تشخیص این واقعیت شد که آن آزادی و حقیقت خود از همان اساطیر بوده است( تئودور آدورنو، زبان اصالت، ترجمهی جمادی،۱۳۸۵ : ۷۸). @tabarshenasi_ketab
Signed سینا جهاندیده
صدای شاعران دیگر رساترین صدایی نیست که در فضای فرهنگ ایران به گوش میرسد بلکه به نظر میرسد رماننویسان رفته رفته جایگاه بلندتری مییابند و چهرههای برجستهتر آفرینش ادبی از میان ایشان پدیدار میشوند ... گفتهاند رمان زادهی هنر بورژوازی ست. در رمان است که انسان دیگر نه با زبان شعر حماسی و روایی بلکه با زبان گفتاری در متن روابط اجتماعی و انسانی نشان داده میشود به عبارت دیگر، انسانی که رویاروی خدا یا خدایان بود با زب…
Signed سینا جهاندیده
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed سینا جهاندیده
۳۶ سال پیش یعنی در سال ۱۹۹۰/۱۳۶۹ داریوش آشوری در سمینار MESA در سنآنتونیو تگزاس سخنرانی مهم و پیشگویانهای به زبان انگلیسی ایراد کرد با عنوان«آیا شعر همچنان رسانهی اصلی فرهنگی ما خواهند ماند؟» این سخنرانی در زمانی مطرح میشد که هنوز شعر پست مدرن در ایران ظهور چندانی نیافته بود. آشوری پیشبینی کرده بود: به نظر میرسد رماننویسان جایگاه بلندتری پیدا میکنند. زیرا جامعهی ایرانی به معنای جامعهشناختی آن یک جامعهی …
Signed سینا جهاندیده
کتاب «Resistance and Enchantment: A Critical History of Translation in Iran» (مقاومت و افسون: تاریخی انتقادی از ترجمه در ایران) به ویراستاری استاد دکترعلی خزاعیفر، بهزودی توسط انتشارات معتبر Routledge در مجموعه تخصصی Routledge Research on Translation and Interpreting History منتشر خواهد شد. این اثر با رویکردی نظری، تاریخ ترجمه در ایران را از منظر دو مفهوم «مقاومت» و «افسون فرهنگی» بازخوانی میکند و با گردآوری پژوهش…
Signed سینا جهاندیده
https://www.routledge.com/Resistance-and-Enchantment-A-Critical-History-of-Translation-in-Iran/Khazaeefar/p/book/9781032757384
Signed سینا جهاندیده
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tabarshenasi_ketab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 82,318 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تبارشناسی کتاب” (@tabarshenasi_ketab), 4,094 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tabarshenasi_ketab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.