Channel
@RavanShenasy_Zard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,426subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001851774293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavanShenasy_Zard |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavanShenasy_Zard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 1,426 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,431 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 1,430 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 1,428 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 1,428 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
76 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 27.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 11.8% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 9.21% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#نقد و #دیالکتیک موجب تعالی گفتمان و رشد شخصی و رشد اجتماعی می شود؛ من همیشه پذیرای نقد بوده ام و از نقد شدن لذت می برم، چون این هدیه ای ارزشمند برای من است؛ و من همیشه سعی میکنم نقد را با روی گشوده و قدردانی پاسخ بدهم... ✍ #شانسکینصکث_لمپب
❤3💘1💯1🤣1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
دلیل نمیشه چون تروما داری ازشون به عنوان بهونه برای رفتار تخمیت استفاده کنی...
👏2🍌1👀1👍1💯1😁1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
#جفت_یابی_مجازی خیلی خوبه. برای ما دخترا اصلا جای نگرانی نداره. پسرای مجازی مخصوصا تلگرام، #اخته ی #ادیپال هستند. یعنی خطری ندارن و رابطه ی کامل نمیخوان. فقط گوش مفتن و میشه کلی رایگان باهاشون حرف زد. مثل هوش مصنوعی، ولی بیشتر از هکش مصنوعی حال میده بهت. چون یه جوری انگار دنبال #آبژه ی #مادر می گردند، و یه تمنا و پیگیری جذاب خاصی توشون هست. نهایت چیزی که بخوان، تازه نسل های جدیدشون چند تا عکس خاص هست که اون هم می…
❤🔥2❤1👏1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
موزیک ویدئو ی زیبای عشق برگا رفته. امیدوارم لذت ببرید. 🙏❤️ ✍ #شانسکینصکث_لمپب
❤2👍1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
این فرد از آن دسته افرادی نیست که حس همدلی را مطلق به خاطر آسیب مغزی تجربه نمی کند. بلکه عدم تجربه ی حس همدلی و شرمش، بخاطر خشمش و آسیب هایش است، در واقع یک سری مکانیسمهای دفاعی است که برای فرد تبدیل به سازمان شخصیت شده است. فلذا گروه اول درمان پذیر نیستند، چون آسیب مغزی است و جسمانی و دارو صرفا می تواند کمی مسکن باشد، ولی منطقا گروه دوم مثل این فرد درمان شدنی هستند، ولی قطعا بسیار بسیار سخت. ✍ #شانسکینصکث_لمپب
❤1👍1💘1💯1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
بزرگسالی زمانی اتفاق میافتد که فرد در مییابد بهتر است به خاطر دلیلی درست رنج کشید تا به خاطر دلیلی اشتباه لذت برد. شاد بودن کافی نیست #مارک_منسن سلامت روان هنگامی محقق می شود که فرد در می باید بهتر است هرگز رنج نکشد، جز در مواردی که مجبور است و کاری از وی ساخته نیست. که دیگر اسمش در لغت تخصصی "رنج" نخواهد بود و نامش "درد" است؛ و فرد باید بداند هیچ ارزش و معنایی برای درد و رنج نیست... ✍ #شانسکینصکث_لمپب
❤1👍1
Signed Shancskinksc Lampb | شانسکینصکث لمپب
زین پس، مسئولیت نشر محتوا در این کانال تغییر کرده و شخصی دیگر سکان نشر محتوا در این مجمع را به دست خواهند گرفت. باشد که خشنود باشید... ♥️
❤1❤🔥1🍌1👎1👏1💘1🤣1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
کپشن : اینارو باید چه کار کنم؟ چرا کافه رفتن هر روز داره سخت تر میشه؟! پی نوشت روانشناسی زرد : چه #سطح_دغدغه ی کوصشری 😒
❤2❤🔥1👍1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
✦💛 #روانشناسی_زرد = علم خودشناسی 💛✦ 🔱 @RavanShenasy_Zard 👑
❤1❤🔥1💯1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1❤🔥1💯1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
روانشناسی زرد میگه : گران ترین درس های زندگی را ارزان ترین آدم ها به تو می آموزند.
💯2❤🔥1👎1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
آره، خلاصه اینجوریاس... ✦💛 #روانشناسی_زرد = علم خودشناسی 💛✦ 🔱 @RavanShenasy_Zard 👑
❤1❤🔥1👍1👏1💔1
Signed MOHAMMAD JAVAD BAGHSHINI
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RavanShenasy_Zard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 181,127 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی زرد | RavanShenasi Zard” (@RavanShenasy_Zard), 1,426 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavanShenasy_Zard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.