شبآوا، شمارهی ۵ نامهی دوم، سرودهٔ نزار قبانی، مجموعهشعر ۱۰۰ نامهٔ عاشقانه، نشر نگاه صدای راضیه بهرامی
❤3

Channel
@nevisandegikhallagh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
7,379subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001055070025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nevisandegikhallagh |
| Description | رسانهی "خانهی نویسندگی خلاق" |بنیانگذار و مدیر: مصطفا پورنجاتی 💎برای ارسال پیام و دریافت اطلاعات دورههای آموزشی، به همکار راهنما، سپیده چمنزاده پیام دهید: @manmatn1 |
| Created | 14 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nevisandegikhallagh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 7,379 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 7,382 | +15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 7,367 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,373 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 7,373 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (17 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,084 |
| Reactions total | 135 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
149 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 71.8% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 12.1% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.01% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.34% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.671% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شبآوا، شمارهی ۵ نامهی دوم، سرودهٔ نزار قبانی، مجموعهشعر ۱۰۰ نامهٔ عاشقانه، نشر نگاه صدای راضیه بهرامی
❤3
زبان پایه برای نوشتن هر نوع داستان یکی از تفاوتهای اصلی «داستان کوتاه» با فرمهایی دیگر ازجمله «جستار»، در شکل و شمایل زبان است. در داستاننویسی، ما با زبان افکار نمینویسیم، بلکه با «زبان تصاویر» خلق میکنیم. تصاویر یعنی صحنهها، اشیا، چهرهها و هر آنچه با حواس پنجگانه درک میشود؛ مانند صداها و جزئیاتی که در یک خاطره شنیده یا دیده شدهاند. درست است که این زبان تصویری، به عددِ هر نویسنده، ریخت متفاوتی میتواند د…
👍5👏2
🖋 شروع به نوشتن کنید. «ترسناکترین لحظه، درست لحظهی قبل از آغاز است. بعد از آن همه چیز فقط بهتر میشود.» برای بسیاری از علاقهمندان به نویسندگی، گذشتن از همین مرحله میتواند به مانعی بزرگ و جدی تبدیل شود. هر کسی که میخواهد نویسنده شود، باید بتواند از این تردیدِ اولیه بگذرد و شروع به خلق و گذاشتن کلمات در کنار یکدیگر کند. به خاطر داشته باشید که تمرین نویسندگی به شکل پیوسته، تنها راه شما برای تبدیل شدن به نویسند…
❤13👍1🥰1🙏1
آرش، اثر بهرام بیضائی را خواندهاید؟ مغایر آن آرش خستگیناپذیر و دهمنمرد است. آرش او مثل هر قهرمان باورپذیر و خوشساخت، ضعف فراوان دارد. از کمر خمیدهاش در مقابل دسیسهای که برایش چیدهاند ابایی ندارد. درست همانطور که در صحنهای از نمایشی که بیضائی خلق کرده، نگاه در نگاه کوه البرز میشود و سرانجام، جان پرتاب تیر برای اولبار در چلهی جانش مینشیند. آدمی که پیشتر هیچ از تیر و کمان نمیداند. بیضائی نویسندهی شجاع …
❤10
آیا میدانید چه چیزهایی نمیگذارد تمرکز کنید برای نوشتن؟ یا چه کسانی؟ آن تمرکزگیرهای بزرگتر و مهمتر، برای شخص خودتان... #فکر_نوشتن
❤9
شبآوا، شمارهی ۴ شعر افق روشن، سرودهٔ احمد شاملو، مجموعهشعر هوای تازه، نشر نگاه صدای راضیه بهرامی @Nevisandegikhallagh
❤2👏1
ریکو-خوانی اگر میتوانید حرف بزنید، اصول ابتدایی جملهسازی را میدانید، پیامی تلفنی مینویسید یا میتوانید متن یک تشکر را یادداشت کنید، پس مهارتهای زبانی لازم برای آموختن نوشتن خلاق را دارید. دانستن دستور زبان، پیششرط این کار نیست. منبع: Writing the Natural Way، فصل اول ♦️نکتهای در تفسیر این نقل قول از گابریله ریکو: این جمله دربارهی عبور از وضع فعلی نوشتن است. معنایش این است که برای گذر از سطح موجود به طر…
❤7
وقتی گوش به کمک قلم میآید / ۱ یکی از کلیدیترین و در عین حال نادیدهگرفتهشدهترین تکنیکها در فرآیند ویرایش و صیقل دادن متن، بازخوانی آن با صدای بلند است. بسیاری از ما عادت داریم متنهایمان را در سکوت و تنها با چشم مرور کنیم، اما حقیقت این است که چشم بهراحتی از روی سکتههای قلم، ابهامهای ساختاری و حشوهای پنهان عبور میکند. وقتی متن را با صدای بلند قرائت میکنید، گوش به عنوان یک داور بیطرف و ناخودآگاه وارد عم…
❤14👍2👏1
شبآوا، شمارهی سوم بخشی از جستار سالهای سیاه بهقلم نلسون ماندلا، منتشر شده در کتاب من سرگذشت یأسم و امید، نشر خوب صدای راضیه بهرامی محتوای اختصاصی خانهی نویسندگی خلاق @Nevisandegikhallagh
👏6❤3
شأن نقد نوشتهها اگر میخواهید به مرحلهای برسید که بتوانید اثر خود یا دیگران را به شکل اصولی نقد کنید، اهل نوشتنبودن کافی نیست. خیلی از افراد تصور میکنند نظر دادن درباره یک متن، یعنی فقط بگوییم از آن خوشمان آمده است یا نه؛ اما در دنیای حرفهای نویسندگی، نظر دادن به معنای شأن نقد نوشتهها اگر میخواهید به مرحلهای برسید که بتوانید اثر خود یا دیگران را به شکل اصولی نقد کنید، اهل نوشتنبودن کافی نیست. خیلی از افراد…
👍9👏3
شبآوا، شمارهی دوم شعر کوتاهی از مارکوس اورِلیوس، منتشرشده در مقدمهٔ مجلهٔ کتاب تراژدی، شمارهٔ بهار ۱۴۰۵ صدای راضیه بهرامی @Nevisandegikhallagh محتوای اختصاصی خانهی نویسندگی خلاق
❤4
تکنیک احضار واقعیت در نوشته یکی از اصولیترین روشهای احضار واقعیت در نوشته، به تواناییهای هوش فضایی ربط دارد. شبیه کاری که مارسل پروست انجام میداد در نگارش اثر مشهورش: در جستجوی زمان ازدسترفته. زندگی همواره در ظرف زمان و مکان و در حضور اشیا رخ میدهد و هیچوقت در یک محیط خالی اتفاق نمیافتد. ما میتوانیم تجسم کنیم و جزئیات وقایع، اشیا، بوها و مکانها را به یاد بیاوریم. برای این کار، وقتی پیشنویس اولیه را نوش…
❤7👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @nevisandegikhallagh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nevisandegikhallagh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 475,671 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"خانهی نویسندگی خلاق"” (@nevisandegikhallagh), 7,379 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevisandegikhallagh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.