Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Discourse

Channel

Discourse

@Discourseees

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,888subscribers

+1,309 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002101193793
TypeChannel
Username@Discourseees
Descriptionتبلیغات : @MB137bot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Discourseees

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,46923,88823,178.55 August 2026 — 22,579 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,580 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,580 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,561 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,537 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,492 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,469 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,475 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,647 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,587 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,544 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,672 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,645 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,718 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,782 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,834 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,795 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,876 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,846 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,952 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,047 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,011 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,087 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,088 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,068 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,200 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,355 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,346 subscribers9 September 2026 — 23,455 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,412 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,471 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,425 subscribers17 September 2026 — 23,649 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,633 subscribers26 September 2026 — 23,888 subscribers5 August 202626 September 2026
37 measurements spanning 52 days, net +1,309. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,256–24,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 19:0023,888+255
19 Sept 2026, 17:3823,633-16
17 Sept 2026, 06:1823,649+224
15 Sept 2026, 08:5823,425-46
13 Sept 2026, 16:1523,471+59
11 Sept 2026, 20:1723,412-43
9 Sept 2026, 11:1623,455+109
6 Sept 2026, 05:4023,346-9
4 Sept 2026, 00:4023,355+155
2 Sept 2026, 13:2323,200+132
1 Sept 2026, 13:2823,068-20
31 Aug 2026, 11:5523,088+1
30 Aug 2026, 10:4823,087+76
29 Aug 2026, 08:3523,011-36
28 Aug 2026, 09:4623,047-15
27 Aug 2026, 11:0323,062+110
26 Aug 2026, 07:3522,952+106
25 Aug 2026, 10:5722,846-30
24 Aug 2026, 11:1822,876+81
22 Aug 2026, 15:4722,795first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.28%
avg views ÷ 23,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.681%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held76 (23 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total40,329
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈628
Videos
≈8,030
Links
≈2,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13h 50m
Average length
20m 16s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

694 reactions across 51 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33748.6%
❤‍🔥7010.1%
👌669.51%
👏608.65%
👍436.20%
💘405.76%
🙏284.03%
💋131.87%
🔥111.59%
😍111.59%
🥰101.44%
👎50.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 702 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 76 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Discourseees. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC649 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• ارادهٔ آزاد در جهان علت و معلول (→) • در این ویدیو به سراغ دیدگاه دنیل دنت دربارهٔ ارادهٔ آزاد می‌رویم. اگر رفتار ما نتیجهٔ علت‌های پیشین است، آیا هنوز می‌توانیم آزاد باشیم؟ دنت در کتاب Freedom Evolves نشان می‌دهد که آزادی لزوماً در تضاد با جهان علت و معلول نیست و می‌توان آن را پدیده‌ای طبیعی و فرگشت‌یافته دانست. @Discourseees

27 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC815 viewsread 27 September 2026

مقاله جدید و جالبی در Frontiers in Human Neuroscience یک مدل برای توضیح تجربه اراده آزاد تحت فرض جبر علّی پیشنهاد میکند. تز اصلی این هست که تجربه «من این عمل را آزادانه انتخاب کردم» ممکن است حاصل یک خطای نسبت دادن علیت و نوعی شرطی‌سازی خرافی (superstitious conditioning) در حلقه حسی‌ـ‌حرکتی باشد که یعنی مقاله بیشتر دنبال توضیح منشا تجربه اراده آزاد است تا اینکه فقط بگوید اراده آزاد وجود ندارد. دقت شود که این مقاله یک…

26 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• چرا سینه‌های زنان تا این حد بزرگ است؟ تکامل عجیب عمل کرده (→) @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• استفاده از آزمایشات چکاپ برای، تخمین سکته مغزی و قلبی(→) • در این ویدیو یاد می‌گیرید که چطور با استفاده از اعداد و فاکتورهای موجود در برگه آزمایش چکاپ دوره‌ای (مثل کلسترول، فشار خون، eGFR، قند و شاخص BMI)، درصد احتمال و ریسک ابتلا به بیماری‌های قلبی-عروقی و سکته قلبی یا مغزی را در ۱۰ تا ۳۰ سال آینده محاسبه کنید. • تایم‌بندی (فصل‌های ویدیو): 00:00 - مقدمه و پیش‌بینی ریسک سکته با آزمایش 00:32 - متغیرهای لازم در…

26 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• ماشین گرفتگی، علت، پیشگیری و درمان (→) • سرفصل‌های ویدیو: 00:00 - مقدمه و آشنایی با بیماری حرکت 01:04 - ماشین‌گرفتگی در چه شرایطی رخ می‌دهد؟ 01:44 - علت علمی بیماری حرکت (مغز، چشم و گوش داخلی) 02:53 - مهم‌ترین علائم موشن سیکنِس 03:33 - ۵ نکته طلایی برای پیشگیری از ماشین‌زدگی 04:50 - راهکارهای دارویی (دیمن هیدرینات و دیفن هیدرامین) 05:37 - اقدامات فوری در صورت بروز تهوع در سفر • صوتی @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• مناظره علمی ꞉ آیا روایت تکامل و خلقت انسان هم‌زمان می‌توانند درست باشد؟ (→) فایل صوتی @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• تکامل مغز، چگونه تکامل باعث ایجاد خودآگاهی در مغز ما شد؟ آخرین قدم تکامل مغز؟ (→) خودآگاهی دقیقاً چیست و چرا ما می‌توانیم درباره‌ی خودمان فکر کنیم؟ آیا توانایی شناختن «خود» ویژگی منحصربه‌فرد انسان است یا ریشه‌های آن را می‌توان در سایر حیوانات هم پیدا کرد؟ در این ویدیو به سراغ یکی از پیچیده‌ترین پرسش‌های زیست‌شناسی، فلسفه و علوم اعصاب می‌رویم: خودآگاهی چگونه در فرایند تکامل شکل گرفته است؟ بررسی می‌کنیم که مغز چگ…

26 Sept 2026, 19:14 UTC987 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• چقدر با قوی ترین انسان های کره زمین فاصله داری؟ @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,130 views0 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Video

• افسانه های بدنسازی • خیلی از چیزهایی که سال‌ها توی باشگاه شنیدیم، امروز توسط تحقیقات جدید رد شدن. از سوزش عضله گرفته تا پنجره آنابولیک و ترس از هوازی؛ علم دیدگاه متفاوتی داره. این ویدیو رو ذخیره کن و برای کسی بفرست که هنوز این باورها رو قبول داره. به نظرت بزرگ‌ترین افسانه بدنسازی چیه؟ @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• هوشِ سرشار یا کنجکاویِ بی وقفه؟ • این ویدیو به بررسی زندگی و دستاوردهای علمی ریچارد فاینمن، فیزیکدان برجسته و برنده جایزه نوبل می‌پردازد. فاینمن که علیرغم داشتن ضریب هوشی متوسط (۱۲۵)، با کنجکاوی بی‌پایان و پشتکار به یکی از بزرگترین دانشمندان زمان خود تبدیل شد، نقشی کلیدی در وقایع علمی مهم ایفا کرد. @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

بعد از پایان(مرگ) از دیدگاه راجر پنروز، ریاضیدان و فیزیکدان نظری @Discourseees

26 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

• سو تفاهم در مورد دما @Discourseees

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @Discourseees. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,278
#1
دیپلماسی
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,793
#2
علم سیاست
@PoliticalScience_ir · 26,305
#3
سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,755
#4
تحکیم ملت
@tahkimmelat · 17,131
#5
Finance & Economics
@UTfinance · 12,665
#6
📚✏️ندای سیاست
@nedaye_siyasat · 13,257 (as read 18 September 2026)
#7
مدرسهٔ علوم سیاسی
@political_sciences_sbu · 4,793
#8
Radio Gatsby سیاست
@RADIO_GATSBY · 4,254
#9
ویرایش ذهن | شهاب‌الدین حائری شیرازی
@virayeshe_zehn · 31,149
#10
سیاست شناسی
@politicology · 7,558
#11
[ شبکه علوم سیاسی ]
@Political_Science95 · 9,580
#12
داروین صبوری
@darwinsabouri · 12,659
#13
کافه سیاست 👑
@politicscafe · 106,606
#14
راه نو🖤
@Newwaypolitics · 21,150
#15
تحلیل و رصد
@tahlilvarasad · 72,426
#16
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری)
@iranazadvaabad · 32,666
#17
سودابه قیصری
@soudabeh_qaisari · 8,841
#18
دنیای خاکستری
@Donye_Khakestari · 7,147
#19
کتابخانه ایرانشهر
@theiranshahrlibrary · 3,785
#20
سیگنال آزادی
@signal99 · 4,500
#21
انتشارات ‌روزنه
@rowzanehnashr · 3,181
#22
اندیشکده بهارستان
@Baharestan_ThinkTank · 3,183
#23
آرشیو
@arshivefarhikhtegan · 1,662
#24
دکتر تقی کیمیایی اسدی
@Taghi_kimyai · 7,863
#25
هم‌نقد هم‌شوخی
@naghd_joke · 12,484
#26
Vergangenheit²
@TarikhDanam23 · 2,014
#27
آرزوی فردای بهتر
@arezoefarda · 3,623
#28
اندیشه ورزان ایران
@iranian_thinkers · 1,558
#29
تاریخ اشکانیان | Aškānān gāhnāmag
@Arsacid_Chronicle · 5,933
#30
ناگفته‌های تاریخ معاصر ایران-ناتاما
@na_ta_ma · 16,384
#31
چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟
@whynationsfail2019 · 11,663
#32
Kierkegaard | کی‌یرکگارد
@kierkegaard3 · 18,910
#33
ایران‌دل | IranDel
@IranDel_Channel · 3,692
#34
آینده (عباس عبدی)
@abdiabbas · 30,117
#35
...
@XTY259 · 422
#36
روشنگران
@roshangarane2024 · 2,457
#37
لیبراسیون/لیبرالیسم
@cafe_andishe95 · 18,241
#38
پیغام آشنا - ناصر دانشفر
@peyghameashna · 5,552
#39
️ نجات بهرامی
@nejatbahrami · 5,744
#40
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,361
#41
فلسفه و دانش
@fargasht22 · 2,576
#42
نوروزنامه | حسین دهباشی
@Norooznameh · 6,205
#43
تله موش
@Tale_moosh · 1,744
#44
مدرسه
@madrasefalsafe · 6,022
#45
𝐀𝐋𝐙𝐀𝐘𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐒𝐌
@alzaymerissm · 2,222
#46
Aasoo - آسو
@NashrAasoo · 29,328
#47
علم ، دین ، خرافه
@elmdinkhorafeh · 2,884
#48
شرق دور
@Iransharghedoor · 1,488
#49
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری)
@FarazTed · 20,586
#50
اعظم بهرامی
@azambahramiran · 1,488
#51
جناب گاو
@jenabegav · 14,833
#52
عدالتنامه
@edalatnaame · 2,404
#53
[ چشم انداز اقتصاد جهان ]
@Languagepolitics · 2,393
#54
تعمّق - فلسفه و هنر
@Taamoq · 13,678
#55
مستند و کلیپ افق رویداد
@ofoghclip · 6,049
#56
بایگانی
@baygani_mahdavifar · 4,999
#57
فلسفه و علم و دانش
@barokh · 1,391
#58
روزنامه اینترنتی فراز
@farazdaily · 15,480
#59
افسانه فولکلور و ادبیات حماسی
@legendfolkepic · 20,047
#60
آموزش خوشنویسی با خودکار آزاد سیدمحمدی
@azad_sma · 5,472
#61
پژوهشگاه ایران‌شناسی
@atorabanorg · 8,396
#62
ساسان آقایی
@SasanAghaei · 4,981
#63
صدای اکوایران
@eco_voice · 13,566
#64
ᵉᶰᵍˡᶤѕʰ ˡᶤᵗᵉʳᵃᵗᵘʳᵉ 📚
@literatureEnglishTeacher · 8,720
#65
اکبر گنجی
@ganji_akbar · 11,378
#66
خوزستان پاره تن ایران زمین است
@iran_khouzestan · 4,960
#67
فرزانه روستایی
@IRANfarzanehroostaee · 2,911
#68
کـــانـــال خبــــــری تــــحــلــیــلــی کـــوچـــــه
@koochehnewschannel · 17,003
#69
Classical music
@mosighi_irani_classic · 11,366
#70
IndyPersian
@Indypersian · 73,892
#71
نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی)
@ahmadzeidabad · 74,793
#72
Mohammad Aleph
@mohammadaleph · 6,536
#73
یادداشت‌های دفتر سیاه
@yaddashthayesiah · 2,979
#74
یادداشتهای فرهاد طباطبایی
@tabatabaeifarhad · 173
#75
موسیقی فاخر
@man_s_hastam · 11,504
#76
گالری هنر
@man_h_hastam · 3,889
#77
عیار
@ayarenaghd · 1,907
#78
رسانه یونیکا Unika
@unikador · 12,465
#79
یدالله کریمی پور
@Karimipour_K · 21,385
#80
هنر برتر
@HONARBARTTAR · 14,623
#81
بیژن اشتری
@bijan_ashtari · 7,733
#82
خرمگس
@kharmagaas · 18,348
#83
گفت‌وشنود
@Dialogue1402 · 5,411
#84
Liberty Institute / انستیتو لیبرتی
@liberty_institute · 3,479
#85
Toos Tahmasebi
@toos1989 · 5,704
#86
Mohammad_lameei
@Mohammad_lameei_guitarist · 1,815
#87
ڪلبہ‎‌‌‎‌‌شـ؏ـردلاویز
@kolbeh_sher_delaviz · 8,357
#88
رازها و نمادها و آموزه‌های شاهنامه
@ShahnamehToosi · 9,099
#89
𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝙅𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝘼𝙇 مجله هنری
@ARTTJOURNAL · 35,028
#90

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,278
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
کتاب آوا
@avabookchannel · 52,088
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
I am Zeus
@zeus110 · 23,154
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
علم سیاست
@PoliticalScience_ir · 26,305
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
اندیشه
@andiiishe · 33,516
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
تحلیل و رصد
@tahlilvarasad · 72,426
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
راه نو🖤
@Newwaypolitics · 21,150
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
دانشگاه های بدون کنکور هیوا
@noexam · 21,115
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026
کانال کنکور سراسری هیوا
@konkoorex · 21,937
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری)
@iranazadvaabad · 32,666
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
کافه سیاست 👑
@politicscafe · 106,606
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
یافته‌های نوین روانشناختی
@Hrman11 · 23,347
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,361
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Discourse” (@Discourseees), 23,888 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Discourseees.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.