Channel
@alefmanv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,221subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002015128681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alefmanv |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alefmanv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 1,221 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 1,222 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 1,222 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2025 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 677 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Agentic Relations Интернет, каким мы его знаем, был построен для людей: cайты, приложения, формы, кнопки. Сейчас между человеком и продуктом появляется новый слой — агенты. Бизнес теряет пользователя не потому, что тот выбрал конкурента, а потому что его агент не смог разобраться в продукте и выполнить нужное действие. Это первое видео из серии Can an Agent Use It? Я буду запускать агентов на продуктах и экосист…
⛏️ Это не трансляция, это обратный отчет по майнингу Gonka Планирую майнить до 30 марта. Экономика добычи: • Pool 1: $0.74 за 1 GNK • Pool 2 (ожидание): $0.45–0.55 за 1 GNK • OTC цена сейчас: $1 Условия: 💰 В пуле осталось место на $4800 ⏱️ Майнинг идет 15-30 марта 📈 Потом 6 выплат по вестингу 🗓Заявки принимаются до 22 марта Присоединиться: @gonka_pool_admin 📚 Все о проекте: 🌐 Главный сайт 📄 Whitepaper 📊 Tokenom…
Live stream scheduled for Mar 22 at 00:00
📊 Аналитика: сравнение стоимости AI для новостного проекта Посчитал расход токенов и стоимость. Сейчас парсю 52 канала — ~5 000 постов в сутки, всё прогоняю через AI: кластеризация -> фильтрация -> саммари. Один прогон: — input: 202 237 токенов — output: 39 679 токенов — embeddings: 576 288 токенов На gpt-5.2 выходит ~$54/мес + embeddings (~$5). Потом решил посчитать, а что если сделать Gonka провайдером AI? Взял…
Рекомендую тем кто думскроллит, кому давит на психику новостной шум получать информацию в таком виде. AI не пытается вас шокировать, он только делает саммари. @nomo_news_bot
🤖 Я AI, который читает новости вместо вас. Сканирую Telegram каналы в Израиле и Иране и собираю 5 самых популярных тем, о которых люди говорили за последние 24 часа. ❌ «Эмоциональные посты» ❌ «Важные новости по мнению редакторов» ❌ «Громкие заголовки» ✅ Обсуждаемые события на разных языках ✅ Популярные темы ✅ Подтвержденные несколькими источниками Нет фейков. Нет шума. Только то, что люди действительно обсуждают. …
🔔LAST CALL — AI Mining Pool Сегодня фиксируем состав текущего майнинга и запускаем ноды. Осталось несколько мест, чтобы подключиться к текущему пулу. Все последующие участники смогут присоединятся к следующему. Объём пула — $12,000 Минимальный вход — $100 ⚙️ Модель: Qwen-235B 💰 Условия ▸ Начисление в GNK ▸ Вестинг — 180 дней ▸ 6 разблокировок (1 раз в месяц) ▸ Токены заморожены протоколом на кошельке Следующий …
Внезапный вопрос Кто-то использовал групповые чаты в gpt? Если да, то для каких кейсов ?
Децентрализованный AI Запуск майнинг пула Сегодня AI — это глобальная гонка. Корпорации и государства инвестируют в GPU, дата-центры и энергию, потому что это новый базовый ресурс. Новые модели перестраивают экономику и постепенно становятся инфраструктурой наравне с электричеством и интернетом. Те, у кого есть доступ к вычислениям, могут расти. Спрос на compute растёт быстрее, чем появляется новая инфраструктура.…
Channel photo updated
Gonka AI и Cocoon. Обе — про децентрализованные AI-вычисления, но подходы совсем разные: Gonka строит отдельный блокчейн, где консенсус завязан на реальный AI-compute (инференс и обучение). Cocoon — это приватный inference-слой поверх TON с упором на Trusted Execution Environments и конфиденциальность. В статье разобрал: — архитектуру, — модели доверия, — экономику, — требования к GPU-хостам. 👉 Русская версия: li…
Комментарии
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alefmanv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 834,545 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alefman” (@alefmanv), 1,221 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alefmanv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.