曼谷发生枪击事件:男子纵火后向救援人员开枪,造成1人死亡 据悉,9月25日星期五上午,曼谷 Bang Phlat 区 Soi Charan Sanitwong 67 一带,一名男子疑似纵火烧毁自家房屋,随后多次向赶来处置的警察、消防员和救援人员开枪。 枪击迫使救援人员寻找安全地点躲避,无法靠近现场。警方随后封锁周边区域,并紧急疏散附近居民,消防人员则全力控制火势,防止火灾继续蔓延。 据报道,这栋房屋属于一名已退休的少将,而涉枪男子疑似是他的儿子。 警方还发现房屋周围有多把疑似军用枪械,以及疑似爆炸物,因此紧急派遣排雷和拆弹专业人员到场处理。 目前已造成1人死亡,更多情况仍在进一步确认中。 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289

Channel
《今日热点》东南亚大事件
@dk789
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,276subscribers
+56,558 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002015809854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dashijian0 @dk789 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #泰国 #缅甸 #斯里兰卡 #越南 ⚡️《今日热点》东南亚大事件!专注于华人最新动态与时事资讯,还原真实海外故事,政策变动,避坑指南,圈内热点,这里应有尽有! 商务: @TX289 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dk789 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 101,276 | +8,709 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 92,567 | +4,501 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 88,066 | +4,927 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 83,139 | +2,421 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 80,718 | +4,774 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 75,944 | +4,130 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 71,814 | -585 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 72,399 | -638 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 73,037 | +3,829 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 69,208 | +1,580 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 67,628 | +8,823 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 58,805 | -404 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 59,209 | -979 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 60,188 | +1,530 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 58,658 | -348 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:12 | 59,006 | -178 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:28 | 59,184 | -298 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:43 | 59,482 | -216 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:03 | 59,698 | -124 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 59,822 | first reading |
Engagement
836 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.14%
- avg views ÷ 101,276 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,160
- 503 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.146%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 503
- of 836 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 298 of 503 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 836 (7 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 581,798 |
| Reactions total | 518 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈40,700
- Videos
- ≈5,670
- Links
- ≈9,370
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 18m
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 261 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
844 reactions across 451 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 108 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 102 | 12.1% | |
| 🎉 | 99 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 99 | 11.7% | |
| 😁 | 81 | 9.60% | |
| ⚡ | 80 | 9.48% | |
| 🥰 | 78 | 9.24% | |
| 🤩 | 69 | 8.18% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.948% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.474% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.237% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.118% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.118% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.118% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 452 of the 836 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 844 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 836 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友分享 在柬的兄弟们,如果你们没钱、没护照,签证又逾期了,想回国的话,就不用再去大使馆咨询了,我已经帮你们问过了。 大使馆那边给我的说法是:护照丢了就补护照,签证逾期了就去移民局补签、交罚款;ID锁了,下载不了“中国领事”,就找朋友、找家人帮忙;没钱就找家里。总的意思就是,这些问题他们都不管。 所以,在柬的兄弟们如果想自首回国,就直接去大使馆对面的老地方,坐免费大巴去安置点就可以了,不用再去大使馆咨询。 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
👑🪖⛑🎓👒🧢🎩🧣🧤🧦 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U+实力雄厚 🚗 官网:🇽🇰 8T.COM —— 铸就人生奇迹 🥭经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 🥭东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 🥭官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 🥭选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 ♠ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🐨🐯🦁🐮🐷🐽🐸🐵🙈 😀赌神再现8T娱乐城短短几小时提款130万U🏑 😀30分钟内提现100万U大额无忧提款秒到🏑 😀仅用2000U本金10天爆奖50万U超高爆率🏑 😀运气爆棚65U返水爆30万U创财富奇迹🏑 😀又一赌神莅临8T娱乐城4小时内提现105万🏑 😀赌神大佬2小时提现…
😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂 1820905.com 人民币平台 顶尖博彩平台 实力派·放心赢 ⭐🎰🤩🤩 8k3006.com USDT平台 全网最高返水 每日返水3%无上限 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 大户首选(安全保障客户信息安全) 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🚊 PG《麻将胡了》爆出 121W丨提款127W 🚊 NBA连中三元精准豪揽 45W丨提款40W 🚊 PA《百家乐》豪赢 184W丨提款 183W 🚊PP《糖果1000》暴击 100W丨提款142W 😁😁😁😁🔥❤😁😁😁🔥☺🔥加入 #182体育 赶紧来领取 电子可拉2万一注 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888,双重日存彩金128888+4688每日送,周流水彩金68888每周送,双重签到彩金16888+3888送不停 每笔存款加赠1% 支持任意平台vip等级平移 🔤🔤🔤🔤 以及C币,K豆,OKpay、👌微信,👌支…
#网友曝光 #开云招商 注意了哈 这个狗逼呢,说自己做的宝威天推,然后说宝威要倒闭了,自己出来找平台做团队,然后各种忽悠说给你拉会员。也不自己开线,就是要你自己开,要你自己转化玩家,实际上都是他自己!他说没有办法入职 先给他维护下面的会员,一顿吹牛逼过后就开始会员充值要拿卡 不愿意平台充值 都是大哥,一顿操作反正是套路之多! 据说此人骗了不少人不管如何必须制裁一下他,也可以让大家避雷,本人通过一点小手段获取到狗逼在操作时候的实时照片!供大家参考避雷!
🤩1
#网友投稿:入境泰国的真实反馈,海关问什么 第一问:现金 第二问:酒店 第三问:离泰机票 第四问:去哪里玩,至少说3个以上的地名 第五问:做什么工作,怎么证明 海关问问题是不会给你缓冲的,哪个问题答不上就让你去小黑屋。 温馨提示:千万不要找保关,这种属于机场灰产链条,这里有一个弊很多人都没有说出来,只要你保过一次你的护照在泰国各大机场就有记录,下次不管你用什么签证只要入境泰国都要保,相当于你已经自动变成长期客户。如果你不保在入境的时候工作人员的电脑会有弹窗也能查到记录,然后找个借口带你去办公室。 还有一点需要保关的人他心里清楚,自己是什么德行,正常人根本不需要。 盘问的问题也是取决于你最近1年之内入境泰国的次数,普通游客,半年去一次,1年去1-2次不用担心,盘问很少,有的航班不问。
#泰国新闻 当局无力应对年年洪灾,民众只剩祈祷 曼谷因暴雨持续,多地年年反复发生内涝,但相关负责人未能采取有效防范措施,民众的不满与失望情绪不断高涨。 目前,包括拉差达披色路、明武里、Lat Krabang 及东部路段在内的超过15个地点发生内涝,车辆通行几乎瘫痪,交通仍十分困难。 “如果当局已无力防范年年遭遇的洪灾,那留给民众的就只剩祈祷了。”民众的这类批评声音,再次凸显了城市管理和排水系统的薄弱。 菩萨 : 我要是有这个能力保佑你们,我就不用被泡在水里了。😭 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
😁1
#网友投稿:太子集团某大哥在加拿大被绑架了一个多月,付了3000W赎金放出来了,据说这名大哥姓dai 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
👍1😁1
#币圈资讯 比特币第三季度暂涨逾四成,涨幅位居历年同期前列 截至2026年9月26日,比特币第三季度累计上涨约43.4%。按2011年以来的季度数据比较,这一阶段性涨幅暂列同期第三,低于2012年的82.6%和2017年的74.1%。 若将统计范围限定为2013年以来,今年第三季度迄今的涨幅则排名第二,仅次于2017年。 第三季度将于9月30日结束,最终涨幅和排名仍取决于季度收盘价格。 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 9999 全网独家公开官方验证渠道 以契约精神守护每一次选择 真实力不需要跨大包装来强调 PP\PG正版游戏,下注记录与开奖结果均可通过官方渠道查询核对。 拒绝私彩,拒绝双系统,拒绝暗箱操作。 玖玖久久 靠验证赢得信任。正规,经得起查;实力,看得见。 ✅ 100%正版授权 ✅ 官方数据可查询 ✅ 游戏结果可核验 ✅ 全程记录可追溯 ✅ 公开透明可验证 ⚡ 9999官方数据建立信任用户亲自验证 ⚡ 官方客服: @L9999L ⚡ 商务洽谈: @SW9999 ⚡ 代理咨询: @TGCS9999 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
木牌11名中国人被抓 9月25日,柴桢省有关部门突查巴域(木牌)一处共有32间出租屋的地点,其中5处发现涉嫌网络诈骗的线索和证据,现场控制20名外国人,包括9名越南人和11名中国人。 警方查获大量电脑和手机,其中4名中国人没有护照。另有4处出租屋内的35名外国人经检查未发现涉及电诈。 目前涉案人员及物证已移交柴桢省警方网络犯罪部门,相关出租屋被暂时关闭。 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
🎉2
中国澳门君怡酒店昨晚突然“查场”!现场一下子热闹了…… 9月25日晚,澳门君怡酒店一处水疗中心突然遭到突击检查,现场据说有70多名女孩被带走调查 原本还在营业,没想到执法人员一到,现场气氛瞬间变了……到底发生了什么?现场究竟查出了什么? 目前不少细节还在了解中,后续情况有待进一步确认。 关注今日热点➡ @DK789 投稿➡ @TX289
🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 836 posts we hold for @dk789. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@www8tcom · 37,23134 posts(官方)182平台综合频道
@ty182_0 · 18,32533 posts(官方)182平台体育频道
@ty182_4 · 17,98723 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 16,91418 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,71918 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 7,38118 posts8K国际玩家福利频道
@FL8KGJ9 · 3,92214 posts8k3008.com- 8K国际官方频道
@vip8k66 · 5,92413 posts182体育推单频道
@TY182T · 17,59010 posts182体育官方频道
@VIP182VIP · 12,54910 posts182体育 招商合营
@TY182HY · 9149 postsY3国际娱乐城官方频道
@Y3GJ9 · 5,8158 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 19,9927 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 14,1025 posts8K国际官方频道
@VIP8KYL1 · 8,2125 posts今日全网曝光频道
@bg833 · 291,8631 post东南亚大事件
@bx666 · 467,8451 post启航娱乐城-唯一官方频道 7h666.com
@qihangbet · 1,2091 postSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 35,581,5151 postViber自动回复|Viber批量运营|Viber协议账号
@wg888ii · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@svip40 · 110,383#1
@dashijian2 · 492#2
@jiaxundashijian1 · 484#3
@flb00 · 17,692#4
@anwei2 · 34,725#5
@cctvPH · 190,942#6
@bg833 · 291,863#7
@feilongwang · 92,276#8
@vip35r · 47,471#9
@redian3 · 60,292#10
@baoguangee · 179,272#11
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,900#12
@qqdsj · 196,784#13
@dashijianbot1 · 269#14
@phnews · 14,671#15
@bodutt · 39,340#16
@iiiik · 49,140#17
@xbbg8 · 280#18
@baoguangqun999 · 37,189#19
@vipn8888 · 67,457#20
@DNYXW008 · 79,700#21
@dxdb001 · 6,917#22
@cctv_dy · 36,686#23
@tg04277 · 33,845#24
@yihuanqz · 15,173#25
@feilongwang3 · 14,090#26
@xinhuaribao · 939#27
@SB919 · 139,268#28
@dny1577 · 5,364#29
@phwife58 · 1,327#30
@zuhaofang · 324#31
@TintucPhilippines247 · 4,524#32
@jiaxunhaiwaibaoguang · 167#33
@vnnews · 5,720#34
@tichtactichtac · 144,290#35
@OKVIPTT · 22#36
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@huarenvvip · 36,039
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 30 August 2026
@jyzf27 · 41,840
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 2 September 2026
@hyxw3 · 76,099
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@xinwenhc · 203,770
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@ebpay · 208,396
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 2 September 2026
@bg833 · 291,863
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
@redian3 · 60,292
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 23 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,008
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@svip40 · 110,383
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 17 August 2026
@toutiaoshijian · 74,884
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 18 August 2026
@qqdsj · 196,784
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 11 August 2026
@feilongwang · 92,276
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
@f_kbg · 150,008
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《今日热点》东南亚大事件” (@dk789), 101,276 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dk789.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.