Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 海外华人曝光

Channel

海外华人曝光

@hwhrbg

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,021subscribers

-7,120 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002118462570
TypeChannel
Username@hwhrbg
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #西港 #泰国 #缅甸 #马来西亚 #越南 《海外华人曝光》官方唯一电报频道,专注于东南亚新闻资讯,为东南亚华人提供及时、可信、高质量的报道,以及就本地和国际动态作出深度评析。 📡广告投放/曝光联系: 🚩全球资讯一手掌握🚩 @lanm220
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hwhrbg

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@hwhrbg/16358 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC@DNYXW008/6704527 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@hwhrbg/16361 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC@DNYXW008/6704827 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@hwhrbg/16367 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC@DNYXW008/6705427 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@hwhrbg/16463 · this entry30 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC@DNYXW008/6715130 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC1.00under a minute
@hwhrbg/16471 · this entry30 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC@DNYXW008/6715930 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@hwhrbg/16707 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC@DNYXW008/674147 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@DNYXW00829 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@DNYXW008 (29–0)
@bxc88828 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bxc888 (28–0)
@huisedny11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007.0 hours@huisedny (11–0)
@quanwangdsj10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006.4 hours@quanwangdsj (10–0)
@z55555q6 (5/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.971.6 hourseven
@gtkx16 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.7 hours@gtkx1 (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 87 of the 87 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 433 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,93135,14124,03612 August 2026 — 35,141 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,756 subscribers15 August 2026 — 34,674 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,617 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,217 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,614 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,450 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,214 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,152 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,068 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,943 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,121 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,004 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,977 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,943 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,879 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,625 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,411 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,376 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,295 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,248 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,150 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,058 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,990 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,960 subscribers17 September 2026 — 21,870 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,596 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,401 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,309 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,434 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,359 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,319 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,271 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,159 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,123 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,112 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,095 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,083 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,069 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,060 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,051 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,041 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,029 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,021 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,994 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,998 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,977 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,965 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,944 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,947 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,937 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,931 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,419 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,108 subscribers7 November 2026 — 20,993 subscribers9 November 2026 — 23,007 subscribers10 November 2026 — 23,054 subscribers12 November 2026 — 28,021 subscribers28,02112 August 202612 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -7,120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,600–38,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 23:0628,021+4,967
10 Nov 2026, 16:2123,054+47
9 Nov 2026, 06:2823,007+2,014
7 Nov 2026, 21:1620,993+5,885
6 Nov 2026, 19:3715,108+1,689
5 Nov 2026, 20:3513,419+488
4 Nov 2026, 22:2712,931-6
4 Nov 2026, 01:0712,937-10
2 Nov 2026, 21:3412,947+3
2 Nov 2026, 00:5612,944-21
31 Oct 2026, 23:2712,965-12
31 Oct 2026, 00:3612,977-21
30 Oct 2026, 00:3912,998+4
28 Oct 2026, 22:0012,994-27
27 Oct 2026, 20:1813,021-8
26 Oct 2026, 22:1113,029-12
26 Oct 2026, 01:1913,041-10
25 Oct 2026, 04:5013,051-9
24 Oct 2026, 07:4413,060-9
23 Oct 2026, 10:1113,069first reading

Engagement

558 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.29%
avg views ÷ 28,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
641
231 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.182%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
231
of 558 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 231 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held558 (12 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total148,185
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,000
Videos
≈3,000
Links
≈3,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 53m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 128 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 558 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 558 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 231 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC11 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#环球大事件 柬埔寨集中销毁750吨假冒香烟及伪劣商品 今天上午,柬埔寨副总理兼内政部长苏速卡与副总理兼司法部长高乐在干拉省共同主持仪式,集中销毁一批查获的假冒伪劣商品,总重约750吨。 据国家警察总署副总监蒙速贴通报,该批物资为执法部门在2024年6月至2026年10月期间陆续查扣的涉案物品。其中绝大部分为假冒香烟及包装材料(共约725吨),此外还包括假冒苹果电子产品、Boss服装、牙膏、机油、退热贴及医用缝合线等。 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC18 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#环球大事件 #66U黑平台 #黑款2万U 66U黑台子,充值10000U提现20000U,直接被卡住,没有说任何理由,在线客服只会说审核部门正在审核,已经过去36个小时,客服爱理不理的,连本金都不给,在66U玩大的用户注意了,不用被骗了,赶快换个可靠台子,66U.COM 认准黑台子! 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC24 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#环球大事件 #群友投稿:想说一说柬埔寨当下真实的处境。 我师弟当时只是在西哈努克太子寰宇看房,却被拦下带走,属于无辜被羁押。没有审问,没有告知关押理由,一开始就索要高额赎金。一关就是25天,之后又被送到金边芒果三号安置点。 安置点物价极高,一顿饭就要几十美金。好好一个正常出行的人,遭遇这样的事情,谁看了不心寒?这样的情况,以后谁还敢安心来柬埔寨? 现在开始把中国人当日本人整了吗?真是辣鸡! 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC694 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首存1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣送 2️⃣8️⃣ ,亏损再送1️⃣8️⃣ 😡主营旗下博彩业务有 😭电子🐠捕鱼🎬真人视讯♟棋牌💵彩票 😀❤️❤️❤️❤️ 😡本平台客户可免费享受本集团的酒店客房及餐饮服务 😄我们的服务: 😚简单注册/USDT、ABA充值/无上限 😝实时可查、返奖快、无冻号、秒到账 😒国际盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😂超低投注门槛7*24小时想玩即玩 ➡️➡️放心玩、放心赢、放心提,😀 😀 😀 😀 祝各位贵宾游戏愉快、盈利多多、好运连连哟!!! 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 👍😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

13 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#Telegram:又被攻破,发现了一个新的漏洞,只需点击一次,就可能通过小部件感染您的设备。 开发团队试图修复,但紧接着又发布了新版本。 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:希望东风园区江总看到后,能够为我们这些底层的兄弟们主持公道。 博创公司拖欠员工业绩提成,始终不发。其他公司在监狱里给员工发放生活费,出来后给予补偿。唯独我们博创公司,在监狱里没人管就算了,回来后没有补偿,这些我们也能忍。 可是,兄弟们做出的业绩,答应给的工资和业绩提成也不给。毕竟,兄弟们都是拿命挣点窝囊废。这点业绩,公司当初承诺的,为什么现在不给?就这样,消息也不读、不回,怎样对得起兄弟们? 任何一个集团也好,公司也好,都离不开我们这些底层的“狗推”助力。 过河拆桥,太不地道了。当初承诺的算什么?兄弟们逃命几个月,担惊受怕,又坐了一年牢狱,九死一生,终于回到国内。还要面临“帽子叔叔”的压力,哪些不需要用钱?希望领导们看见后,能够换位思考。我们只是想要回属于自己的那一份而已。 江总旗下东风园区东创集团——博创公司 老板:黄毛、大洋(兼财务) 总监:麻子 组长:阿山、大宝 督导:宝森 从2025年10月下旬公…

13 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC32 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

吉隆坡👮‍♂️大行动🌪全体单位集合!👮‍♂️ 大规模扫荡行动即将展开。 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:今晚金边出动数百名联合执法人员,包括宪兵、特种干预部队及刑事警察等,在会议期间加强治安巡逻和安保工作。 没带护照的兄弟们,就别出来瞎几把乱逛了。 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

越南下龙市破获韩国跨国诈骗团伙,9名韩国籍嫌疑人被捕,涉案金额达15.5亿韩元 11月13日,据韩国媒体报道,韩国首尔警察厅公布一起发生在越南的跨国诈骗案件,9名韩国籍犯罪嫌疑人因涉嫌冒充韩国军方实施建筑材料采购诈骗,已被陆续逮捕并移送检方,目前均处于羁押状态。 调查显示,该犯罪团伙于2025年11月至2026年6月期间,以越南广宁省下龙市为主要活动地点,冒充韩国军方相关单位工作人员,向韩国境内建筑承包商谎称需要采购建筑材料,并要求受害企业通过指定代理公司购买相关物资。 嫌疑人随后以预付款、材料采购款等名义收取资金,在收到款项后便失去联系,实施所谓的“无货交付”诈骗。 警方调查发现,该团伙利用电话中继设备,将从越南拨出的境外电话伪装成韩国本地电话号码,同时通过假名片及伪造的官方文件增强可信度,以此降低受害企业的警惕。 截至目前,该团伙已涉嫌诈骗韩国62家建筑承包商,累计涉案金额约15.5亿韩元,折合约110万美元。 …

13 Nov 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

东盟峰会聚焦跨国电诈问题,中美及东南亚国家拟加强联合打击 11月13日,据美联社及菲律宾当地媒体报道,跨国网络诈骗、人口贩卖及诈骗园区问题预计将成为即将在菲律宾马尼拉举行的东盟峰会重要议题。东盟成员国、中国、美国及其他合作伙伴有望进一步加强合作,共同应对日益严重的跨国网络犯罪。 据报道,此次会议将重点讨论跨境网络诈骗、人口贩卖、非法资金流动及诈骗园区等问题,并推动各国加强金融监管、数字安全建设、跨境情报共享和执法协调。 在打击措施方面,各方拟通过加强国际合作,追踪诈骗集团资金流向,协调跨境执法行动,拆除非法诈骗窝点,并追究相关犯罪组织及幕后人员的责任。 与此同时,会议也将关注被迫参与诈骗活动人员的处境,推动加强受害者识别、救援及保护工作,避免将遭人口贩卖和强迫劳动的受害者简单视为犯罪嫌疑人。 相关背景数据显示,联合国报告曾对全球网络诈骗造成的经济损失发出警告,相关犯罪已经成为影响多个国家社会安全、金融秩序及区域稳定的跨…

13 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

美国新任驻柬大使拜访洪森 11月13日上午,柬埔寨参议院主席洪森在金边参议院团结宫,会见美国新任驻柬埔寨大使克里斯托弗·约翰·安德森(Christopher Jon Anderson)。 据报道,双方举行了礼节性会见并进行工作交流。这是安德森以美国新任驻柬大使身份开展的外交活动之一。 订阅➡️@hwhrbg 投稿联系➡️ @lanm220

13 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:彭亨州18间度假木屋沦为诈骗窝点,警方逮捕14人,包括12名台湾籍男子 11月13日报道,马来西亚警方近日在彭亨州文冬(Bentong)展开突击行动,捣毁一个涉嫌冒充台湾警方实施电话诈骗的犯罪集团。警方调查发现,该集团租用当地18间度假木屋作为诈骗据点,最终逮捕14名男子,其中包括12名台湾籍及2名马来西亚籍人员。 据报道,警方于11月5日至6日期间展开相关执法行动,调查发现,涉案集团租下18间度假木屋,租期约两个月,并将这些场所改造成电话诈骗中心,涉嫌冒充台湾警方身份,通过电话联系受害者实施诈骗。 行动期间,警方共查获2台笔记本电脑、15台平板电脑、69部手机及70张SIM卡,另外还起获印有台湾警方标志的制服、背心及帽子等物品,怀疑有关装备被用于冒充执法人员,增加诈骗活动的可信度。 目前,警方正进一步分析查获的电子设备及通讯记录,以厘清14名嫌疑人在诈骗集团中的具体分工,并追查案件是否涉及其他成员及跨境…

Showing the 12 most recent of 558 posts we hold for @hwhrbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@xgrj0 · 146,615
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 12 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻/曝光/大事件
@JPZRD68 · 61,421
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“海外华人曝光” (@hwhrbg), 28,021 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hwhrbg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.