Channel
@nb688
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
331,382subscribers
-19,443 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001346880741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @atmji @duidan @faquan @huohui @juejia @kejiao @nb688 @nbtoutiao @xuepa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 361 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nb688 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @nb688/39425 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 13:11 UTC | @fc365/210142 Sept 2026, 13:12 UTC | 0.96 | under a minute |
| @nb688/37951 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC | @fc365/1958915 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC | 0.94 | under a minute |
| @nb688/38880 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC | @fc365/2048226 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC | 0.91 | under a minute |
| @nb688/42543 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC | @fc365/2388710 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC | 0.91 | under a minute |
| @nb688/40468 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC | @fc365/2200916 Sept 2026, 02:16 UTC | 0.89 | under a minute |
| @nb688/42905 · this entry14 Oct 2026, 14:46 UTC | @fc365/2420214 Oct 2026, 14:46 UTC | 0.89 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @fc365 | 35 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.90 | under a minute | this entry (35–0) |
| @gg365 | 24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.90 | under a minute | this entry (24–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,245 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 12:21 | 331,382 | -101 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 09:48 | 331,483 | -401 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 19:09 | 331,884 | -115 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:15 | 331,999 | -492 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:05 | 332,491 | -77 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 20:08 | 332,568 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 332,568 | -226 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 11:45 | 332,794 | -153 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:49 | 332,947 | -55 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:08 | 333,002 | +2,490 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:56 | 330,512 | +623 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 329,889 | +1,314 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 328,575 | +2,704 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 325,871 | +236 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:58 | 325,635 | no change |
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 325,635 | +6,119 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:41 | 319,516 | no change |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 319,516 | +147 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:36 | 319,369 | +740 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:54 | 318,629 | first reading |
2,388 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,388 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,178,253 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 01:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 311 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 687 posts held from the last 30 days (0.146%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#菲律宾资讯：菲司法部建议起诉托帕西奥等六人网络诽谤。 11月10日，菲律宾司法部发布决议，推翻去年12月驳回投诉的决定，建议对律师费迪南德·托帕西奥以及另外五名网络博主提起网络诽谤指控。 该投诉由参议员洪蒂维罗斯在2025年7月提交。涉案帖文称，她在针对阿波罗·基博洛伊性贩运案的参议院听证当中贿赂、教唆证人作假，还组织宣传抹黑副总统萨拉、前总统杜特尔特等人。 司法部认定相关言论已经越过对公职人员合法批评的边界，带有实质恶意。洪蒂维罗斯对这一决定表示欢迎。 另一方面，基博洛伊目前因性虐待、加重人口贩运罪名在押，司法部正在准备引渡申请。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#网友投稿：金三角特外，最近会迎来联合执法，会塞和别的地区已经来了很多警察了，特外暂时停工撤离了，暂时是待不了。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#柬埔寨资讯：柬埔寨遣返72名涉电诈印尼人。 2026年11月10日，柬埔寨移民总局协同印度尼西亚驻柬埔寨大使馆，于11月8日至9日，在德崇国际机场完成驱逐行动，一共遣返72名印尼公民。这批人员涉嫌非法滞留，非法务工以及网络钓鱼诈骗。 移民总局称，持续遣返涉案外籍人员，是落实首相指示的执法行动。柬方重申，绝不许不法分子借柬埔寨领土实施诈骗，防范跨境安全风险；当局会继续打击网络犯罪，追查人口贩运案件，营救受害人员。 早在今年10月27日内政部长与印尼代表团会谈时，印尼方面就为本国公民在柬参与网诈问题致歉。 历史数据显示，2023年柬埔寨曾分批遣返427名同类涉案印尼人，当年还有上千名陷电诈网赌的，印尼民众向使馆求助回国。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#泰国资讯：洛坤府急救车雨天失控撞树，四人遇难一人重伤。 2026 年 11 月 10 日下午 14 时 53 分，洛坤府他沙拉县发生惨烈车祸。莫克兰镇行政组织的急救车，载着一名三岁患病男童赶往医院，行经波通镇第二村路段时，因雨天路滑失控撞上路边大树。 急救车车尾严重损毁，车上四人当场殒命，包括这名三岁男童、他的两名亲属以及随车急救人员；51 岁的驾驶员身受重伤，被救援人员送医抢救。 警方已经到场勘查，正在厘清这起事故的具体诱因。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#越南资讯：公安部高官之女伦敦炫富引争议，名牌珠宝引发质疑。 近日，越南社交平台及海外网络流传多张照片，28岁女子范玉芳草被指是越南公安部副部长范世松的女儿。 据网传的照片，她在英国伦敦生活期间，经常展示名牌服饰、奢侈手袋、名贵珠宝及高档腕表，还曾分享与父亲的合影。 相关照片引发网民热议，不少人质疑其奢华生活的资金来源，并关注官员家庭财富透明度问题。 此外，网络上还有部分网民因发表评论而疑似受到威胁或施压的说法，但目前缺乏独立证据证实警方是否介入。 截至目前，当事人及其家人是否就相关质疑作出正式回应，尚待进一步确认。 PS：高官儿女坑爹的不少🤣 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
#小姐姐投稿：寻那段“露水之缘”，想念曾经的地中海马哥。 曾经的秃顶、地中海、大胡子的白白胖胖的马哥，不知道你现在还好吗？ 👤 从抠脚大汉变帅哥 以前180斤，地中海秃顶，留个胡子的抠脚大汉，成都人。现在120斤，前刺锡纸烫，穿一身休闲装的帅哥。没有你的联系方式了，挺想念你的。 💸 没钱要钱，二话不说就给 想想那时候，你对我挺好的。每次没钱了，问你要钱，你二话不说都给。还耐心听我喝醉了，不是在那胡言乱语，就是各种吐槽生活。柬埔寨大严打，人都走了、没了，挺担心你的。 我之前飞机注销了，找不到你了。 🛫 最后一次见面：去英国，全断了 最后一次见面，你说：“分手，打最后一炮。”虽然我知道你嫌弃我活不好，因为你是重感情的人，并不是非要打炮。 你说你要去英国了，以后不会再和我联系了，任何女生都不会联系了，全部断，全部拉黑。 你谈女朋友了，后面也想要小孩，不能对不起人家。 我们俩在客厅坐着，喝了酒。你问我以后怎么打算，让我…
#巴西资讯：中国男子sha害18岁少女并藏尸！遗体遭比特犬啃食。 近日，巴西当地媒体报道，里约热内卢一名中国籍男子邱兆虎因杀害18岁少女马塞尔·朱莉娅·阿劳若·达席尔瓦，并藏匿其遗体，被当地法院判处38年监禁。 案件发生于2025年6月12日。 据调查，邱兆虎长期追求受害者，但女方只愿与他保持朋友关系。 案发当天，他以准备了情人节礼物为由，要求少女亲自前往其住所。 监控画面显示，少女进入其住所数小时后，邱兆虎独自推着一辆盖有蓝色防水布的手推车离开。 随后，警方在他位于里约热内卢北部帕武纳区（Pavuna）的另一处房产内发现少女遗体。遗体被蓝色防水布包裹，部分身体已遭到两只比特犬啃食。 调查显示，邱兆虎将遗体转移至距离住所约800米的另一处房产，企图掩盖罪行。案发后，他逃往圣保罗州，最终在卡拉皮库伊巴市被警方抓获。接受警方讯问时，他承认勒死了受害者。 2026年10月29日，里约热内卢第二陪审法院作出判决，邱兆虎因女…
#币圈资讯：币安限制与抹茶资金往来，转入资产或遭扣留审查。 11月10日，币安发布公告称，因美国金融犯罪执法网络将抹茶交易所（MEXC）列为重大洗钱关注对象，币安将停止处理涉及 MEXC 及其关联实体的资金交易。 具体限制包括： ⏺币安转入抹茶： 相关转账请求将被直接拒绝。 ⏺抹茶转入币安： 相关存款将被暂时扣留，并接受合规审查。 ⏺账户风险： 审查期间，受影响的币安账户也可能被限制交易、转账或提现，严重情况下可能终止服务。 此次限制涉及 MEXC Global、MEXC Estonia、MEXC Singapore 等多家关联实体，并包括相关关联平台。 此前，美国财政部于11月6日宣布对MEXC采取反洗钱特别措施，指其在2021年至2026年间涉及至少160亿美元非法资金流动，包括与制裁规避、网络犯罪等相关的交易。 币安特别提醒用户，不要直接或间接通过平台与上述实体进行资金往来。 对于同时使用币安和抹茶的用户，近…
#网友曝光：点陌生博彩链接，公司公户5万U被瞬间盗空。 这些盗U的SB真是si🐴的东西！ 事情是这样的，我是一名公司的财务，我们公司是做日本盘的。今天刚有一笔5万U的款入金进来，被盗U的SB给盗了，就是图片上这个人。 他们给我发的博彩广告，我想着闲来无事打一下试试。结果就是他们给我发的链接，我进去玩了一个小时赢了1000多U。下分的时候，我绑定了我自己的收款地址，我手机上公司公户上的5万U就没有了。 我被公司主管在办公室打了1个小时。草你M的盗U狗，现在的盗U技术这么牛逼吗？点了链接进去玩了一会，UU就没有了。 大家一定要以我为戒，不要随便点陌生的长链接！ 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
📣⚪⚪⚪🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 📣 老牌在线娱乐城 BTC.cc 独家福利！ 📣 纯💵充值，有充有送，充越多送越多 📣📣📣📣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 1⃣ 新人注册首充最高送8888U 大额充值畅通无阻坚持诚信 2⃣ 不计输赢投注1U 最高返水5% 打造值得信赖的娱乐品牌 3⃣ 无限代理代理模式不限层级最高佣金55% ⚪⚪⚪🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 提现记录连续到账，累计提现金额高达 2,118,540 USDT ⚪⚪⚪⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 从充值，到实战，再到提现，每一笔记录，看得见！ ⚪⚪⚪🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻 BTC.cc ⚪⚪⚪⚪ @BTCcc 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻 @BTC08 👩💻👩💻👩💻👩💻 @BTC09
#国际资讯：国际刑警16国联合收网，262人被捕。 11月10日，国际刑警组织（INTERPOL）公布，联合欧洲刑警组织等机构，在16个国家开展打击非法移民偷渡及人口贩运行动，4天内共逮捕262人、启动434项新调查，并识别出41个有组织犯罪集团。 📊 行动成果 ⏺262人被捕：221人涉嫌组织偷渡、16人涉嫌人口贩运，其余25人涉及伪造证件等犯罪。 ⏺109名疑似人口贩运受害者被发现。 ⏺1715名非法移民被查获或识别。 🚢 重点拦截行动 ⏺摩洛哥：拦截一艘载有70人的船只，其中包括30名未成年人，船上人员已在海上漂泊6天。 ⏺塞内加尔、毛里塔尼亚：联合拦截一艘载有80人的木船，其中包括2名儿童，并逮捕3名涉嫌组织偷渡人员。 此次行动于10月5日至8日展开，共动员7660名执法及边境管理人员。国际刑警表示，后续将根据收集到的情报继续追查犯罪网络，不排除出现更多逮捕行动。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://…
#国内资讯：上海商场厕所装广告镜，照着镜子突然放广告。 11月6日，中国上海一名网友发视频称，有商场在公共卫生间洗手台前装了带屏“广告镜”，顾客照着照着，镜面就突然播放商业广告。 发视频的人说当场被吓了一跳。网友担心里面装了监控都不知道，还调侃用镜子前先看60秒广告的时代来了。 📣 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳 ❤️ https://t.me/nb688 😍 投稿爆料：@nb288 👉加入东南亚华人交流群
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,388 posts we hold for @nb688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚头条” (@nb688), 331,382 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nb688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.