Channel
@TG_368
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,327subscribers
-1,089 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001844151376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TG_368 |
| Description | 要点资讯，安危事件，曝光爆料，社会热点推送。 跑路人员信息曝光 曝光删帖发布： @TGH_361 华人社区： @TG_3623 专注于：ins，fb，推特，公众号，竞价速推类，指定国家城市人群关键词投放 #出渗透一手 shell seo国内流量池 https://nexus777.vip/ ✍🏻关键词搜索： #网红查黑问题 #+名字 #曝光 #悬赏 #骗子 #名字 商务合作： @TGH_361 ⚠️ 本频道只有一个，其他都是模仿⚠️谨防上当受骗 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TG_368 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 28,327 | -118 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 28,445 | -216 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 28,661 | -199 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 28,860 | -344 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 29,204 | -212 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 29,416 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,437 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 充值6800元，启航娱乐提现21390元却迟迟不给出款 本人于10号在启航充值6800元，完成投注后账户余额达到21390元，随后申请提现，却一直无法正常出款。 刚开始平台给出的理由是：怀疑IP异常，认为本人可能人在国内。平台表示，等核实IP后，如果确认本人不在国内，就可以正常出款。 然而我足足等了48小时后，平台又给出了新的说法：同一个IP地址存在3个账户，因此只有其中一个账户有效，相关投注被认定为无效。 这里我就有些无法理解了： 如果是因为同一个IP存在多个账户就被判定为违规，那么多人在公司、家庭、宿舍或者其他公共场所使用同一个Wi-Fi，难道其他账户就都不能正常游戏和提现了吗？ 更让我无法接受的是，平台一方面说存在IP异常、多账号登录等风控问题，另一方面又直接认定投注无效，甚至连充值的本金也不予退还。 我发帖不是为了恶意攻击谁，只是把自己的实际经历公开出来，也希望准备在启航玩的的朋友谨慎考虑
#网友投稿 这几个自称股票盘。出来要工具几天不结账。给他们稳定接粉了几天。账还是不结，今天实在逼他们急了。狐狸尾巴就漏出来了。名字叫许文强。白起。深呼吸。大家注意了
#柬埔寨 #缅甸 此人外号大财，福建人。 之前在西港公司上班，后来柬埔寨扫荡去了缅甸，在缅甸朋友那里跑路后想来我这里做事，结果到了我这里没几天，钱花了，也给他预支了，不到10天又跑 人走了给他时间还钱，刚开始说的很好听，有了给我，后面信息不回，没态度，装死，本来是不想发他出来的，一而再再而三的不回信息，装看不见，恶心人，就当喂狗了 这种人他妈的这么活不起吗？这里跟你掏心掏肺，你却玩脑筋骗，能致富不是？ 在东南亚的盘总要是接到这货，务必避雷。被骗事小，太他妈恶心人了！把兄弟对你的信任用在这种地方，你也是够活不起的。
#网友曝光 我的大哥，名扬公司 #景哥、天哥，原东风园区盘总： 画饼最厉害的就是你。真的是“人走茶凉”一点也没错。当初打牌差我52万泰铢，折合成人民币11万，你就给了我7万，还剩几万没给我。 当初我尽心尽力地为公司做事，身为大哥，那么大的盘总，好意思打牌不给钱嘛？现在我遇到事了，求你把剩下的几万救命钱给我，你也不回信息。 你们别逼我走极端。你一个家族真名我就不发了，希望你看见信息后联系我。身份证、护照照片我都有。逃避解决不了问题。
#老挝万象雅典饭店被突袭 这次里面的推推在劫难逃了，直接全部围起来了。
#网友投稿 妙瓦底 我家门前的电杆上，有人来偷电表箱 当时狗一直在叫，我就看了监控，发现家门口电杆上的电表箱被偷，狗一直叫，看监控发现有人正在拆 一开警报他们就跑了，但底下一个零件还是被顺走了，动作真快。 日前部分秒瓦迪居民因电表被偷，被电力局罚款了60万缅币。 Ps： 电表箱你们不帮装在里面，被偷了还要罚款，说不定就是一伙的呢！
迪拜出现职业偷盗外围女注意 最近有一伙专门偷东西的外围女跑到迪拜来了。 昨天某别墅就碰上两个。她们先哭诉自己丢了5万，或者一共10万，然后就嚷着要搜别的女孩行李箱和钱包。搜的过程中动作贼快，直接把钱塞进自己裤兜里。可这5万压根儿来路不明，被偷的女孩要是没编号、剧情对不上，她们就满嘴跑火车。 钱哪来的？说法一套接一套： 第一说在上海地下钱庄换的。 第二说跟哪个香港大哥睡了好几年，从他那儿挣了不少才来迪拜。 第三又改口说是你安排给她的客人给的。 谎言一串接一串，反正就是说不清楚钱从哪来，却非要搜别人的包。 各位嫖客看好自己的贵重物品，各位做外围的妹子也管好现金和首饰，别让这帮人偷了还倒打一耙。 ✍️华人资讯 欢迎各大媒体、自媒体转发。为了方便大家转发，我们不加水印、对爆料内容不加原创。
注意这个！骗子，当时在我公司运输烟！海关扣留要求他出1.5万迪拉姆清关；今天我信任他给他支付宝白资3万，他以我找他借1.5万迪拉姆借口直接不回款了！2025年此人因盗刷别人信用卡还车罚款在迪拜入境被抓，我全程帮他处理案件，免费给他提供住宿，免费帮他解决事情，如今换来这样的对待！此人长期跟随一个叫天天的老板从迪拜到柬埔寨戈公到波贝
#菲律宾新闻 又一名绑架犯罪嫌疑人被遣返 8月8日，中国和菲律宾两国执法部门合作遣返了涉嫌在菲绑架中国公民的犯罪嫌疑人樊某某。樊某某来菲多年，曾从事网络赌博，后加入臭名昭著的施某某团伙，多次参与实施绑架犯罪。 必须指出，对于那些在菲律宾祸害同胞、丧尽天良的犯罪分子，中国警方追到海角天边，也要将其一个个缉拿归案，血债血偿。
#网友投稿 啊彪，你说你要搞体育盘，我让朋友介绍了个团队给你，2个月给你做到负盈利100多万，赚到钱了你别人提成和工资都不给了，不管你现在出什么事，人在哪里，一个礼拜把这个事情搞清楚，如果你不处理好，我就把你国内信息发出来，到时候就别怪我无情了。
⚡1
柬埔寨查获112起强迫卖淫案 救出581名受害者 柬埔寨打击人口贩运国家委员会报告显示，2026年前六个月，警方共破获人口贩运及强迫卖淫案件112起，同比增长13.13%，成功救出581名受害者（含333名女性），并将169名嫌疑人（含34名外籍人员）移交法办。
#雅典娜案反转 警方澄清，并没有任何警方公布雅典娜已遇害 “近日，有关百万粉丝网红“雅典娜Liya”（本名孔丽梅）确认遇害的消息在网络流传，引发广泛关注。 2026年8月11日，宁波公安对此传闻作出官方回应，澄清了案件归属及关键信息的来源，强调并未证实该网红已遇害。
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @TG_368. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 767,646 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“跑路人员曝光频道” (@TG_368), 28,327 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TG_368.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.