Channel
@QQDS999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
176,108subscribers
-70,772 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001270195621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @QQDS999 @top999 |
| Description | 商务接广告： @QQSW999 禁言双向机器人： @SWGG999BOT |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QQDS999 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 176,108 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 176,108 | -1,067 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 177,175 | -52 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 177,227 | -1,884 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 179,111 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 179,111 | -1,823 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 180,934 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 180,934 | -2,226 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 183,160 | -68 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 183,228 | -2,032 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:15 | 185,260 | -76 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 185,336 | -20,207 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 205,543 | -489 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 206,032 | -886 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 206,918 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:11 | 206,918 | -1,172 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:29 | 208,090 | -181 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:31 | 208,271 | -723 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 208,994 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 208,994 | first reading |
388 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 263 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 388 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 136,523 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 97 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 75.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 388 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 388 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
粉丝曝光： 重要风险提醒｜请各位老板、同行谨慎核实 本人根据近期亲身经历，各位在孟加拉国及马来西亚有用工、招募、合作需求的老板、总监及代理：如近期与 #马桐、#丁振、#孟昌盛 三人接触，涉及人员招聘、出境工作、护照、机票或预付款等事项，请务必提高警惕，核实清楚后再进行资金往来。 事情经过： 据本人经历，马桐以代理身份联系本人，表示可以安排人员前往马来西亚工作，并要求本人先支付人民币7000元左右的费用，同时承诺收到款项后即可安排人员处理护照签证及购买机票。 本人按照其要求，于当时向马桐一方转账人民币6900元，并将付款成功截图发送给对方。 对方随后回复称已经出发办理、领取护照，并表示当天即可安排后续行程。但之后相关安排多次发生变化，先后以“等待护照”“等待到7点”“改为10点”等理由推迟。本人持续等待并询问进展后，对方仍未能按照此前承诺完成安排。 随后，对方又表示其与丁振联系了一名老板，需要等待约3天，并提到相关合作…
北京时间明天（9月26日）中午 12 点，Bybit 恢复提现！
马来西亚这是哪个集团的“神仙员工”啊？ 脚踩奔驰，身穿迪奥，全身纹身，走路气场拉满，不知道的还以为是哪位大老板出来巡店了。 结果一看 CCTV……好家伙，RM99 的耳机都疑似要顺手带走？ 大哥，你这身打扮看起来都不止 RM9999 了，怎么偏偏在 RM99 这里翻车？且还是电脑店啊…… 这里别的可能不多，CCTV 摄像头是真的多！奔驰负责撑排面，迪奥负责撑身价，纹身负责撑气场， 最后 RM99 的耳机负责送你上镜。这下好了，耳机好不好用不知道，人是真的要出名了！
10月1日起，举报资金盘、传销、违规直销有奖，最高奖励100万。 自10月1日起，群众举报资金盘、传销、违规直销相关违法线索可申领奖励。线索经查证属实，最高奖励可达100万元，鼓励广大群众积极揭发各类金融骗局与违法营销活动。 什么是资金盘、传销、违规直销？ 资金盘：没有真实实体生意，靠不断拉新人交钱，用后进场人的钱给前面的人分红返利。一旦拉不到新人，资金链断裂，平台直接跑路。民族资产解冻、虚拟币理财、高息项目大多属于资金盘。 传销：以发展人头为核心，靠拉人入伙、交入门费，按发展下线层级拿提成，不是靠卖产品赚钱，属于违法犯罪。 违规直销：正规直销有国家颁发牌照，超出许可范围、拉人头计酬、夸大收益、变相传销的，都属于违规直销。 举报奖励相关条件 实行实名举报，提供完整详实证据，线索为执法机关尚未掌握，核查属实立案后，方可申领奖励。 奖励分阶段核发：线索初步核实有效发放基础奖励；案件成功立案侦查追加奖励；案件最终审结，结合涉…
柬埔寨打诈常态化的最底层逻辑： 食利阶层比以前更赚，那为什么不一直打下去？ 而且，现在的创收比以前具有正义性 你可以选择不搞， 你要搞，我就抓，并狠狠惩罚！ 国际社会也支持 名利双收！良性循环了属于是～～
#国内资讯：山西太原清徐公安打掉跨省虚拟币电诈团伙，抓获14名犯罪嫌疑人 清徐县公安局9月22日通报：近日，清徐县公安局成功侦破一起特大虚拟币电信网络诈骗案，打掉一跨省诈骗犯罪团伙，捣毁诈骗窝点1处，抓获犯罪嫌疑人14名，现场扣押作案电脑、手机50余台及作案车辆，有力震慑电信网络诈骗违法犯罪。 2026年8月，辖区群众罗某报案，称被诱导投资虚拟币被骗60余万元。接报后，县公安局高度重视，立即成立专案组开展攻坚。民警经一个月缜密侦查，精准锁定犯罪窝点，同时发现该团伙多次变换窝点持续作案。为及时止损、彻底斩除犯罪链条，专案组奔赴四川，在当地警方配合下，成功在某别墅区捣毁诈骗窝点，当场抓获全部涉案人员，查获大量作案设备。 经查，2026年3月以来，犯罪嫌疑人钟某纠集王某等十余人组建诈骗团伙，通过各大虚拟币平台物色受害人，以社交软件添加好友、长期铺垫洗脑，引诱受害人购买虚拟币后转入虚假平台，随后在后台操控数据，制造投资亏损，强制平…
柬埔寨人也被诈骗了2620万美元 在刚刚结束的打击网络诈骗国际会议上，柬埔寨国家警察总署总监苏通透露，网赌电诈不仅导致外籍人员受害，柬埔寨本国国民在2025年及2026年前8个月内亦受骗损失约2,620万美元。 数据显示，2025年柬埔寨警方共接到1,136起本国公民的报案（损失约470万美元），仅解决51起；2026年前8个月接报1,084起（损失约2,150万美元），仅解决42起。 苏通指出，打击跨国诈骗存在诸多挑战：技术与资金流追查难度大、公众防范意识薄弱、未能铲除潜伏海外的幕后主使，以及涉案人员证件过期导致遣返滞后与财政负担加重。为此，他呼吁国际社会加强跨国合作，共同阻断犯罪链条。
#网友投稿：新规聊聊香港飞的事～ 有些人说去香港坐飞机，进入香港一定要用护照。如果用通行证进入，再用护照飞走，会限制出境。 实际：通行证进入香港，到机场，通行证出香港，然后护照飞，没问题，而且合法的。你得先懂出境需要过几道闸口。 进入机场第一道闸口，刷的是购第三国的票用的证件，也就是护照；第二道闸门是刷通行证出境。很多人是没搞懂第二个闸口，通行证进香港，用护照出，所以被卡。
著名音乐家刘欢病逝，享年63岁 对外经济贸易大学退休教师、著名音乐家刘欢，于2026年9月25日在上海病逝，享年63岁。 刘欢1963年出生于天津，1991年起在对外经济贸易大学任教，2023年退休，曾为该校创作校歌《UIBE之歌》。 遵照刘欢生前遗愿，丧事从简，不举行遗体告别仪式和追悼会。 ps：一代人的熟悉歌声停下了，但那些经典作品还会一直被人记住。刘欢老师一路走好。
#新加坡资讯：冒充移民局再转“中国官员”，117宗诈骗卷走至少840万新元 9月25日，新加坡警方与移民与关卡局公布，自2026年1月以来，这类冒充移民局人员、再转接假“中国官员”的诈骗已发生至少117宗，损失至少840万新元。 骗子通常先冒充移民局人员打电话，谎称受害人的个人资料被盗用，或手机号码涉及诈骗犯罪，再把电话转给所谓“中国官员”。对方随后以“调查”“保释”等理由要求转账或交现金，部分受害人还被要求签署伪造的保密协议，让骗局看起来更真实。 8月14日公布的数据还是72宗、损失至少610万新元。一个多月后，案件增加45宗，损失再增加至少230万新元。新加坡警方提醒，政府人员不会要求公众转账，也不会要求交出现金、黄金、名表或加密货币。
致东南亚还在一线奋斗的诸君： 人在东南亚，水深不语，人稳不言。有些事情看破了，不一定要说破；有些人看清了，也没必要当场翻脸。 君子藏器于身，待时而动。 人在低谷的时候，别急着证明自己；人在风口的时候，也别急着得意。真正能走得远的人，懂得什么时候低头做事，什么时候转身离开，什么时候该忍，什么时候必须止损。 出来混，见过太多起起落落。有人一夜暴富，也有人一夜归零；有人风光的时候身边全是兄弟，落魄以后才发现，真正能靠得住的没几个。 所以，水深不语，事大不声。 能看清局势，就别逞一时之勇；能提前发现危险，就别等事情发生以后才后悔。 庄子讲龙蛇之变。 成蛇之时，俯身草莽；成龙之时，遨游九霄。 人在低谷，沉住气；人在高处，稳住心。输了不怨，赢了不飘。 人在东南亚，钱重要，机会重要，但更重要的是保住自己，守住底线，认清局势。 有所为，亦有所不为；能屈能伸，方能走得更远。 这条路很长，别因为一时的输赢，把自己的人生押进去。该…
#网友投稿：发这篇笔记没有别的目的，就是希望把我的真实经历发出来，让大家看清一些网络交友的套路，千万不要再有下一个受害者了。 我和这位女网友一开始聊天非常投缘，对方表现得温柔大方，甚至让我觉得遇到了对的人。 但随后，对方就开始以各种理由和借口向我索取钱，现在这个人还在亚太，可能去会所了，钱也没多少才2千U，对我这样的有钱人来说只沧海一粟，只是想着被骗心里不舒服，有什么困难直接跟我说就好了，我不是那种差事的人！ ps：吃逼亏上逼当 迟早死在逼身上
Showing the 12 most recent of 388 posts we hold for @QQDS999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球大事件|新闻|曝光” (@QQDS999), 176,108 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QQDS999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.