Channel
@Amirreza_shahbaziy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
82,792subscribers
-3,514 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001202456072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Amirreza_shahbaziy |
| Description | تجربههای واقعی من از بازارهای مالی تحلیل سناریومحور + مدیریت ریسک |
| Created | 29 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Amirreza_shahbaziy |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 82,792 | -142 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 82,934 | -119 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 83,053 | -115 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 83,168 | -173 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 83,341 | -255 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 83,596 | -204 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 83,800 | -130 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 83,930 | -69 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 83,999 | -111 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 84,110 | -63 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 84,173 | -101 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 84,274 | -96 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 84,370 | -71 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 84,441 | -75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 84,516 | -78 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 84,594 | -70 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 84,664 | -119 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 84,783 | -84 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 84,867 | -143 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 85,010 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,594 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 628 | 39.4% | |
| 👏 | 527 | 33.1% | |
| 😁 | 361 | 22.6% | |
| 💔 | 78 | 4.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,594 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۱۴۰۴ هم بالاخره تموم شد… سالی که فکر کنم برای خیلیامون یکی از تلخترین و سختترین سالهای عمرمون بود. هم جنگ، هم تورم، هم فشار، هم از دست دادن عزیزایی که داغشون واقعاً سنگین بود. فقط امیدوارم ۱۴۰۵ دیگه اون سالی باشه که بعد از این همه سختی، یکم نفس بکشیم… یکم آرومتر، یکم خوشخبرتر، و پر از اتفاقای خوبی که حقمونه✌🏼 سال نو مبارک
❤245💔51👏27
امروز اسرائیل زد پارس جنوبی رو و گفت با هماهنگی آمریکا بوده. نتیجه؟ نفت با ۱۰۰ دلار خداحافظی کرد و الان حوالی ۱۱۱ دلاره. 🛢️📈 برگردید پستهای بالا رو بخونید؛ گفته بودم پلهی بعدی کجاست و گرون شدن نفت داستانش چیه...
👏30❤17💔4
‼️ ترامپ در تروثسوشال: افزایش قیمت نفت برای آمریکا سود کلانی دارد!
👏35😁24❤7
این پست یک اصلاح بکنم، قیمت نفت هیچ کندل روزانهای بالای ۱۰۰ دلار نبست! و طبق تحلیل به مقاومت ۱۰۰دلار واکنش نشون داد قیمت تعادی ۱۰۰ برای دنیا مهم بود و دید ترامپ اومد صحبت و ... مقاومت بعدی ۱۲۰ که اگر برسه دیگه با حرف نمیشه جلو قیمت نفت گرفت❗️
👏24❤15😁1
خوب حرفای دیروز ترامپ قیمت نفت تا زیر ۱۰۰ آورد گفتم نزدیک ۱۰۰دلار باید منتظر واکنش و خبر باشیم. ولی اگر جنگ تموم نشه باید منتظر ۱۲۰ باشیم❗️ روند قیمتی بر نگشته و این یک اصلاح ‼️
❤16👏5
🛢️ نفت قیمت نفت با باز شدن بازار خیلی راحت ۱۰۰ دلار رو رد کرد و یه پولبک ریز هم بهش زد. از اینجا به بعد، رسیدن به محدودهی ۱۲۰ تا ۱۳۰ دلار اصلاً دور از ذهن نیست. اونجاست که دیگه دنیا باید تصمیم بگیره… چون اول از همه چین و شرق آسیا میرن زیر فشار، و بعدش اروپا
👏27❤13😁1
️ تحلیل نفت این تحلیل عملاً یه جور «تحلیل جنگ»ه… نفت تا ۹۳ دلار رفته و مقاومت اول هم محدودهی ۱۰۰ دلاره. با این شتاب رشد، اگه موج ادامه پیدا کنه، میتونه تا مقاومت بعدی ۱۲۰–۱۳۰ دلار هم بره. 📌 پس سناریو اینه: نزدیک ۱۰۰ دلار باید منتظر خبر و واکنش بازار باشیم. اگه خبر خیلی بزرگ نباشه و بازار نگه داره، مسیر بعدی میتونه ۱۲۰ باشه.
❤26👏7
دیشب مجلس سنای امریکا لایحه ای که ترامپ رو برای ادامه جنگ علیه ایران ناچار به اخذ مجوز کنگره میکرد با رای ۵۲ به ۴۸ رد کرد. بنابراین دولت ترامپ برای ادامه حملات به ایران محدودیتی از سوی کنگره نداره
👏70❤23💔12
ترامپ: ما افرادی را میخواهیم که ایران را رهبری کنند و کشور را به مردم بازگردانند پسر شاه سابق میتواند گزینهای باشد، اما فردی از داخل کشور برای رهبری کشور مناسبتر خواهد بود.
❤70😁36👏24
ترامپ: پدافند هوایی، نیروی هوایی، نیروی دریایی و رهبری جمهوری اسلامی از بین رفته است آنها میخواهند گفتوگو کنند، گفتم «خیلی دیر شده است»
👏58😁22💔2
نمیدونم اگر تمام بشه کی میاد و بهتر میشه یا نه ولی میدونم با اینا روز به روز حال مردم بدتر میشد.
❤75👏23💔4
صداوسیما حمله به خودش رو تایید کرد😁
😁58❤11💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Amirreza_shahbaziy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امیررضا شهبازی” (@Amirreza_shahbaziy), 82,792 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amirreza_shahbaziy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.