Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned a photo

Channel
Shinei's Gems | 86
@shineigems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,755subscribers
-937 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001754781772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shineigems |
| Description | Welcome to Shineigems 🚀 Best channel Daily crypto updates & Web3 opportunities 💎 Airdrops, bonuses, campaigns & market info ⚠️ Always DYOR Owner: @Im_amshin @kiaback @yakuzagems03 Marketing DM : @Im_amshin @kiaback @Zakiaaalkhusna |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shineigems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 16,755 | -224 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 16,979 | -84 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 17,063 | -203 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 17,266 | -156 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 17,422 | -195 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 17,617 | -75 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 17,692 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 17,692 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.9%
- avg views ÷ 16,755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,840
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.558%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (26 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 38,680 |
| Reactions total | 216 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,270
- Videos
- ≈612
- Links
- ≈5,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
288 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 16.0% | |
| 🤩 | 45 | 15.6% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 14.9% | |
| 🎉 | 26 | 9.03% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 5.21% | |
| 👌 | 14 | 4.86% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 2.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥 Share 785,600 RAIN on WEEX! About Rain Protocol: Rain is a decentralized prediction markets protocol on Arbitrum that provides the infrastructure for anyone to launch their own forecasting platforms. It is the first protocol to offer the tools needed to launch a fully functional prediction product on any topic, and it is also the first to support both public and private markets. By using the Rain SDK, which is spe…
❤3🎉3👍3👏3🔥3🤩3👌1😍1
Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned «https://t.me/Pay_Plus_Bot/app?startapp=8525779264 Join PayPlus and earn money by watching short ads 📱 The easiest way to make $100 per day 💰»
https://t.me/Pay_Plus_Bot/app?startapp=8525779264 Join PayPlus and earn money by watching short ads 📱 The easiest way to make $100 per day 💰
👏5❤4🎉3👌3🔥3🤩3👍2
Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned a photo
Binance Clubhouse hadir di Bali sebagai official side event Coinfest Asia 2026! Bergabunglah dalam pengalaman Web3 eksklusif selama satu hari, tempat komunitas berkumpul untuk terhubung, belajar, dan berinteraksi bersama para figur terkemuka di industri. 📅 Tanggal: 21 Agustus 2026 📍 Lokasi: Area Coinfest Asia Ada dua event spesial yang bisa kamu ikuti: 🏠 Main Event – Binance Clubhouse 🕛 12.00 – 17.00 WITA Nikmat…
🔥5❤4🎉4🤩4👏3😍3👍2🥰2
Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned a photo
alltoscan: ATS - Successful retest of the base - Excellent volume - Logical targets 0.1 0.13 0.16 And it is the most important area, as breaking through it will make the coin shine 0.24 0.4 Stop: Close of daily candle below 0.0636 ‼️ On August 15, WATS Wallet’s decision to start using ATS as the gas fee across all networks will be the biggest factor driving the price increase. 👉 Buy link: ✅ Buy on MEXC ✅ Buy on Ga…
👍4❤3👏3🤩3🥰3
Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned a photo
⚡️$BINI showed around +30% in June and July. And this was not in a perfect market. Summer was difficult for many tokens: liquidity was weak, startups were declining, and many assets were losing market interest. But $BINI looks confident against this background. Why ❓ Because BiniBit has not just a token, but an exchange ecosystem where $BINI already has a clear role. The main driver right now is $BINI staking. …
❤5👍5👏5🔥5🤩5🎉4
Shinei's Gems | 86 pinned a photo
🔥Early Solana project worth a look. 💥@PlayHorseFun has been live since July 16 and is already running 576 on-chain races every day — that's one every 2.5 minutes. 🔥A few things stand out: ✔️ Outcomes are powered by Switchboard VRF and can be verified on-chain ✔️No presale ✔️ No VC allocation ✔️No team allocation ✔️ $HORSE is minted through race activity, with 1% of every race's volume allocated to buybacks and bur…
❤7🔥7🤩7🎉6👌5👏5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @shineigems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 530,763 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@defiai_annoucement · 3881 postFloki Santa Channel 🐶🎅🎄
@FlokiSantaChannel · 1,2661 postFUCKFTX DAO Channel 🗳️🫂🇧🇸🇺🇸🌐
@FUCKFTX_Channel · 3051 postNinjaS In Calls
@ninjasincalls · 2111 postPEPE INU ANNOUNCEMENT
@pepeinu_ann · 451 postPepenguin Inu Channel
@Pepenguin_Channel · 211 postQuack Quack Announcements
@quack_quack_announcements · 2131 postSibyl Network News
@SibylNetworkNews · 901 postSol Floki | Channel
@SolFloki_Ann · 231 postTeWa SideChain - Annoucement Channel
@TeWaSideChainAnnoucement · 291 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@shineigems named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@airdropcomic · 321,837
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 202,162
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoTVOT_News · 190,783
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 221,595
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
@immortal_airdrops · 623,284
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shinei's Gems | 86” (@shineigems), 16,755 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shineigems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.