Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ​ ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 💮

Channel

​ ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 💮

@maybac_whales

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,315subscribers

+4,846 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001951877828
TypeChannel
Username@maybac_whales
DescriptionCEO : @BasedJing Admins : @BasedJing & @XuanSQ 迈巴赫鲸鱼正战略性地拓展亚洲市场 在包括中国 韩国和东南亚的关键地区建立强大的影响力我们依托顶尖KOL分析师和DeFi专家组成的可信网络 #100x #Utility #Memecoin #Bullrun #Dailyupdate ECA : https://t.me/+rOftjzNOCWdlMGFk Tiktok : tiktok.com/@maybachwhales
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maybac_whales

Growth

25,71632,31529,015.56 August 2026 — 27,469 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,469 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,254 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,963 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,761 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,544 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,147 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,047 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,716 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,315 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +4,846. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,726–33,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:1832,315+6,599
14 Aug 2026, 12:3725,716-331
13 Aug 2026, 00:1426,047-100
12 Aug 2026, 01:3226,147-397
10 Aug 2026, 23:4326,544-217
10 Aug 2026, 00:3126,761-202
9 Aug 2026, 00:5226,963-291
7 Aug 2026, 22:2927,254-215
6 Aug 2026, 19:5527,469no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:3227,469first reading

Engagement

156 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 32,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
156 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
156
of 156 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held156 (4 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total518,379
Reactions total11,841
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,800
Videos
120
Links
6,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

11,841 reactions across 156 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉2,57621.8%
👍2,55621.6%
🔥2,52921.4%
2,52821.3%
😱1,65214.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,841reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈8,610 views97 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Catecoin Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 Spent $2,476.97 (32.903 SOL) 🔀 Got 142,110 CATE 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 🏷 Price $0.0172 💸 Market Cap $16,657,952 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #14 On SOL Trending 🔥

👍28🔥25🎉2321

16 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈7,870 views99 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$STAGWIFHOOD 🔥 一个通过 HoodXchange 推出的社区代币围绕“Stag Wif Hood”身份和 HoodXchange 公平启动生态系统构建 ✅: stagwifhood.fun ✅: hoodxchange.com 0xcC142366735c882F7885d3c747db99e45E13E453 ✅: t.me/StagWifHood HoodXchange describes its launches as using locked liquidity and on-chain fee distribution. (HoodXchange)

🎉29👍29🔥2120

16 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC≈1,790 views99 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#3x 🔥 $IMAGINE EpFTb2XcGiMyGLykZ9VYmyPWz2AHEwAggqSbwJpypump Now At 216K MC 🤩

30👍27🎉23🔥19

16 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC≈6,650 views96 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#4x 🔥 $ONGR 0x0817B4bAE4D153126405c2995cb94AFa5987bC48 Now At 500K MC 🤩

28👍27🔥24🎉17

16 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC≈14,200 views98 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🚀$PUMPBOT • #6x 🟩 Called At 15KMC Now At 80KMC 🟩 ECA LINK DePfuMZ4Y2rpjdiFUYAnwgEWpSDbtrD6LQSGUQmbpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/Eg7g2mjD86QJ6KukjsoKgEdExehSY7hAymo7fCWLYWs4

🎉29👍28🔥2219

16 Aug 2026, 00:40 UTC≈3,170 views146 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Catecoin Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 🔀 Spent $607.96 (8.073 SOL) 🔀 Got 34,112 CATE 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 🏷 Price $0.0177 💸 Market Cap $17,107,780 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #6 On SOL Trending 🔥

🔥41👍3736🎉32

16 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC≈7,640 views96 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$NIULAI 🔥 0x3604B5c377124d2180C4fB791953fc8431a90111

🔥27🎉25👍2420

16 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC≈6,370 views98 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$PRINTER 🔥 PRINTER 以真实代币化股票支付 10,000 台 NFT 机器每次销售收取 5% 的费用其中 80% 用于购买持有者在每个周期投票决定的股票这些股票将存入每个 NFT 自己的钱包固定供应量 2 亿无增发仅销毁 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xf6c9f0a8bf94ecda6751465a3097bc4c69914421126d2cbc3df723e36b8cf47b

👍2625🔥25🎉22

Signed ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼

16 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC≈7,970 views99 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$ONGR 🔥 名称 Onigiri 代号 ONGR 这不是部署公告不是实时市场数据这是位于 Sushi 自身启动台测试中的一个虚构代币夹具 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x2c52076b7a6500845bf55b290e0b1d18F3A89c52

👍27🎉25🔥2423

Signed ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼

16 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC≈2,970 views97 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$WASHED 🔥 WASHED 是加密货币推特上那些已过巅峰期的关键意见领袖的链上纪念馆他们曾精准预测每一个顶部也买入了每一个顶部如今他们在KOL养老院的大厅里徘徊仍用颤抖的双手敲下“看涨”二字 https://dexscreener.com/solana/FzsLErMXa7vz8r7wnYsVjzUCqgkBreCeX7yMWs6kCbuK

🎉2725🔥25👍20

Signed ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼

16 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC≈3,800 views99 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$HOBBES 🔥 Ansem's Cat HOBBES 源自推特用户 Ansem 于2024年发布的"hobbes wif hat"一条梗帖是在 StonkFun 平台上由社区发起的实验性衍生代币团队信息未公开项目旨在将网络流行文化与可与股票挂钩的链上代币市场结合面向加密社群与股票代币参与者 https://dexscreener.com/solana/8bf99G5CvcsGXfDPecK8X7XBGVkBXVKoftkSXkLKh3m5

28👍26🔥23🎉22

Signed ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼

16 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC≈3,390 views97 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$IMAGINE 🔥 Imagine Game Studio 源自同名独立实验性产品团队为小型 AI与游戏开发者组合推出以自然语言描述生成2D 可玩游戏的创作工具核心在于无需编码的AI 驱动游戏生成与社区创作协同目标用户为创作者教育场景及轻量开发者愿景是建立普惠的游戏创作生态 https://dexscreener.com/solana/4uUZpgTTnksnD8cwAD3wxsxPcPpxcKvoYwyKHLDfmon1

🔥30👍2621🎉20

Signed ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 鲸鱼

Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @maybac_whales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 649,704 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

中国密码鲸公司 🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖
@ChinapumpWXC · 110,605
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
☎️中国宝石-匚卄丨几乇丂乇🐳
@cryptogems55552 · 121,110
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 207,736
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“​ ᗰᗩYᗷᗩᑕᕼ 💮” (@maybac_whales), 32,315 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maybac_whales.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.