BigBangCalls pinned a photo

Channel
BigBangCalls
@BigBangCall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,779subscribers
-394 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001879579976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BigBangCall |
| Description | 𝗢𝗪𝗡𝗘𝗥 @Farhad_Loyal & @Mr_Fannn_C Just sharing what I'm watching. DYOR. No buy signals unless I say 'CONFIRMED' even then, your risk. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BigBangCall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 18,779 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 18,790 | -163 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 18,953 | -180 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 19,133 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 19,148 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 19,173 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.26%
- avg views ÷ 18,779 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 612
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,692 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,700
- Videos
- ≈927
- Links
- ≈3,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
📔 ANNOUNCEMENT — Wizard Scan Tracking Live My channel is now officially tracked on @WizardScan. Wizard Scan is the most advanced KOL tracking system on Telegram. It monitors top crypto channels 24/7 and sends real‑time alerts when calls hit key milestones — from 2X all the way to 10,000X. 🏆 Why this matters for my community: ⚡️ Every major win gets recorded automatically ⚡️ Performance is tracked — no hype, no fa…
Quick 3x.. not bad ✌️
🔮 @bigbangcall KOL Hit 3X+ $GRANNY SOL play called at $3.2K market cap. Current Market Cap stands at $9.9K. Clean execution. Tracking for the next move. 🔮 $3.2K 🔮 $9.9K Ca: A4hhDTTcz5M4Gi9DzNbmovHtAwpt3zXTg7YvzXMnpump 🔮MAE 🔮KOL 🔮BOT
Gambling A4hhDTTcz5M4Gi9DzNbmovHtAwpt3zXTg7YvzXMnpump
🔵 TOKEN ▶️ $MOON (SOL) 🟡 A based team’s Solana token, currently sitting at 31k mc dip. The team has already delivered solid gains for early buyers and previously hit a 180K mc ath. Iwll try a small bag and see how it goes. Not FNA pl dyor. 7G3CrymmDsAQNhphENgxKA2QN7BBsuW4sEiRkehWpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/8sorndtsh9mwunl9k9pkbkauygfdt776joixafvmb4gm
You bring the strategy. We provide the size. Join Trader Pro to start your lead trading journey with KuCoin Copy Trading. → Deploy up to 5,000 USDT of lead trading trial funds. → Earn 10% from your copiers' profits as your performance scales. → Start Now 🌐 Follow KuCoin Official Global Communities to get the latest updates: Telegram Announcement | Telegram | Discord | Reddit
🔵 TOKEN ▶️ $FOMO (SOL) 🟡 👏Details: Fearless Of Missing Out (FOMO) looks like an interesting token. Some solid callers are supporting it and a based friend referred it to me. Its ath is around 1.18M mc, while the current chart is at 556K MC. Let’s see what happens from here. No FNA.. plz dyor. BDdzUjksj1J4bSnMveQ5tV9Up8A9c6YS1tHrxNw3pump ✅Chart-link ✅Website ✅Twitter/X
🔵 PrediShark AI | Chart Update 🔵 The chart is climbing like the stairs to the moon. I called PrediShark AI at 27.6K mc and it has now reached 89K mc ath. Bullish launch so far! The dev is clearly putting in the work to make the project solid. We hv already seen around 3.4x from my call. 3ncuf2Z4Vr6kzHnACbU845qpxUkHcVf2GHDGKQMUPUMP https://dexscreener.com/solana/hewqhq2kh8fxqhmuhm5br4hbaembkvzb4ws7vayv9uae
SOL TOKEN $BINGUS SOL chain project, launched 4 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $19.4K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 3RoinFB8cgCTcYvSJd1bsGjd27YaNBL1tz9eCbSupump https://dexscreener.com/solana/gshgowuftfpsfwfnutc7aywsiqanvaeoky4qryzhccmd Twitter/X
SOL TOKEN $GILF SOL chain project, launched 13 hours ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $14.7K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 2YxBvZ4BwYtoLdzf7pDAAQ6kExX94q5nz8RrLaPHpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/cs3c1y9gfi8agxavov7ryvnxswq3aauxvjn5cpuvuh2l Website Twitter/X
SOL TOKEN $RAX SOL chain project, launched 26 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $28.8K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 2FdKoTKzmavZuTTqvAqkPHaqtAHoPtC1wH2b7WcVQZod https://dexscreener.com/solana/f46gjweawi3pgy3cqzs2psbxgx7rs4ln8llfqbpsnuss Website Twitter/X
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @BigBangCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 124,504 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@AI_Floki_Ann · 4641 postKing Vergat Calls
@KingVergatCall · 941 postKOLscope
@KOLscope · 29,3011 post🐥Los Pollos Hermanos🐥
@LosPollosHermanosCalls · 5991 postSPACE CAT OF MEME 🟧🟨🟩
@spacecatofmeme · 911 postTesla’s Menu
@Tesla_Menu · 7781 postGCCoin Announcement
@thegccoinchannel · 51 postWizards call
@wizardscall · 9981 postWIZARD SCAN Live
@WizardScan · 43,4621 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 202,162
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@pumpcoinbets · 1,024,021
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 629,356
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@CryptoMonsterClashAnn · 158,213
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@CryptoTVOT_News · 190,783
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoSpaceX04 · 221,595
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
@airdropcomic · 321,837
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@CryptoMoonShootNews1 · 156,921
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BigBangCalls” (@BigBangCall), 18,779 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BigBangCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.