Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo

Channel
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️
@TheCrypto100XGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,008subscribers
-1,059 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001714779444 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheCrypto100XGems |
| Description | 𝗪𝗘𝗟𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗘𝗟 We will provide #ETH #SOL #BSC #TON #XRP #SUI Projects X. https://twitter.com/100xAltcoinGems #Founder : @Globalm77 @StacyKolz : @NouraKOLs @Adamlucas0 : @omar_302 @CEOJohn12 : @Founder100X @Mrjohn156 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheCrypto100XGems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 22,008 | -93 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 22,101 | -253 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 22,354 | -196 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 22,550 | -233 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 22,783 | -62 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 22,845 | -201 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 23,046 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 23,067 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 23,067 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.49%
- avg views ÷ 22,008 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,870
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.70%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (9 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,554 |
| Reactions total | 349 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 791
- Videos
- 115
- Links
- 939
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
430 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 151 | 35.1% | |
| 👍 | 138 | 32.1% | |
| 🔥 | 118 | 27.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 3.26% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.465% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
You bring the strategy. We provide the size. Join Trader Pro to start your lead trading journey with KuCoin Copy Trading. → Deploy up to 5,000 USDT of lead trading trial funds. → Earn 10% from your copiers' profits as your performance scales. → Start Now 🌐 Follow KuCoin Official Global Communities to get the latest updates: Telegram Announcement | Telegram | Discord | Reddit
👍13❤9🔥8
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo
🚀 $RISE | RiseonRH Where ambitious investors come together to build, innovate, and rise together. ↗️ $RISE is building a community focused on growth, opportunity, and a stronger future on Robinhood. 🔥 Why RiseonRH? • Strong Investor Community • Growth-Focused Vision • Innovation-Driven Ecosystem • Long-Term Community Focus 🌐 Website: https://riseonrh.bolt.host/ 🐦 X: https://x.com/riseonrh?s=11 💬 Telegram: https…
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo
Earn 200% APY on Stablecoins for 14 Days with GRVT GRVT has launched a new Liquidity Provider (GLP) Promo for stablecoin holders, available through its Telegram Mini App. During the promotional period, deposits can receive a 200% promotional APY, giving users a new way to earn on idle stablecoins within the ecosystem. The promotion supports both USDC and USDT and follows a simple structure. Open the Telegram Mini A…
❤11🔥9👍5
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo
🐸🍀 LUCKY PEPE ($LUCKY) Wall Street plays for the big players. Lucky Pepe is built for the retail community. Inspired by the Robinhood generation, $LUCKY brings together traders, meme lovers, and crypto believers under one strong community. With a transparent vision, active community, and strong meme culture, Lucky Pepe is more than just a token it's a movement for everyone who believes in the power of the crowd. …
❤19👍14🔥5
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo
✅ LinkeDry Social. The LKSL utility token is the native asset of the LinkeDry Social platform, a social network built to connect people and reward users and content creators. ✅ Fixed total supply: 21,000,000 LKSL – no new units issued 🔒 Security: Planned distribution, long lock-in periods, and controlled release linked to the platform's actual growth ♻ Sustainability: Strategic reserves and strict rules to ensure l…
❤13👍12🔥11
Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️ pinned a photo
🎉 Welcome to the $PACKS Community! We're glad to have you here. 💬 Feel free to chat with the community, ask questions, and connect with the team. Please keep the chat respectful and avoid spam so everyone can enjoy the community. Let's grow $PACKS together! 🚀 ✅CA 0xe59e2953334cc1664181976d79c4b5d39eab7777 ✉️TG https://t.me/stockpackstoken 🔍WEB https://rippacks.fun 🐣X - https://x.com/stockpacks?s=20
❤15🔥11👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @TheCrypto100XGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,304,905 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TheCrypto100XGems named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Gemhunterrs · 618,145
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 200,959
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto 100X Gems 🚨️” (@TheCrypto100XGems), 22,008 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCrypto100XGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.