中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎 pinned «This is also meant; market is getting better, signs of DeFi bull run 👀»

Channel
中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎
@CHINAGEMOFCCCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
82,775subscribers
-1,914 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001945491151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CHINAGEMOFCCCN |
| Description | prevent impersonation,DM ONLY owner @HuaiDongCao2 Verified T1 marketer on GemPad: https://gempad.gitbook.io/the-gempad/marketing-support/call-channels X https://x.com/chinamoonshots https://weibo.com/u/6858075312 Smm mkt @Govirally |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CHINAGEMOFCCCN |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 82,775 | -230 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 83,005 | -362 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 83,367 | -116 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 83,483 | -129 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 83,612 | -132 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 83,744 | -273 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 84,017 | -140 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 84,157 | -142 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 84,299 | -326 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 84,625 | -64 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 84,689 | first reading |
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.6%
- avg views ÷ 82,775 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17,900
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.8%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 62
- of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 822,196 |
| Reactions total | 83,476 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,340
- Videos
- ≈294
- Links
- ≈3,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 30s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
83,476 reactions across 42 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10,585 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 10,513 | 12.6% | |
| 😍 | 10,459 | 12.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10,426 | 12.5% | |
| 🥰 | 10,425 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 10,368 | 12.4% | |
| 💯 | 10,360 | 12.4% | |
| 🤩 | 10,337 | 12.4% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.001% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.001% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.001% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83,476reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
This is also meant; market is getting better, signs of DeFi bull run 👀
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
Ethereum to $2k once 1915 is breaken 👀🚀🤑
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎 pinned «Sunday gamble on $HONKCOIN / RH / 60k https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4220946789CCd1bc5fcd108c4e948cdcE286460a 0x4220946789CCd1bc5fcd108c4e948cdcE286460a I like HONK memes! Looks clean! Send it? https://x.com/honkcoinrh?s=11&t=2ffb4lZZzFs9Xx_5Ig13hw»
Sunday gamble on $HONKCOIN / RH / 60k https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4220946789CCd1bc5fcd108c4e948cdcE286460a 0x4220946789CCd1bc5fcd108c4e948cdcE286460a I like HONK memes! Looks clean! Send it? https://x.com/honkcoinrh?s=11&t=2ffb4lZZzFs9Xx_5Ig13hw
❤96🤩93🔥92❤🔥90😍90👍76💯76🥰70
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎 pinned «🪙$VENUSCOIN 0xf76e106254a2FaC844827a2fEA2B8F9ED80A4444 Buy here https://x.com/cz_binance/status/1936334572519879049 CZ posted about BNB Chain perps volume hitting new ATHs with Venus among the protocols driving heavy lifting. The background is strong ecosystem…»
🪙$VENUSCOIN 0xf76e106254a2FaC844827a2fEA2B8F9ED80A4444 Buy here https://x.com/cz_binance/status/1936334572519879049 CZ posted about BNB Chain perps volume hitting new ATHs with Venus among the protocols driving heavy lifting. The background is strong ecosystem momentum on BNB Chain tied to DeFi innovation and trading dominance. Its logo features a glowing orange planetary sphere evoking the planet Venus against a…
😍115👍112❤🔥109🤩106❤100🥰97💯92🔥90
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎 pinned «https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/30I510nA_0xb427a43fdb224be4e01d1d984d5303b9755b7777 narrative https://x.com/Tiancaidevpzp/status/2088853342785319144?s=20»
https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/30I510nA_0xb427a43fdb224be4e01d1d984d5303b9755b7777 narrative https://x.com/Tiancaidevpzp/status/2088853342785319144?s=20
❤🔥103👍103😍98🔥89❤85🤩85💯84🥰78
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎 pinned a video
$BEHEMOTH 🔸 I don't want to say for sure that this is the next 100X. But if the developer can convince the creator of the idea to support the token, that would be great. We are at the beginning of a new cycle of memes and startup projects. This time centered on dear and lovely China and hosted by BSC Chart🦖 https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/minecode_0x4e8fc9e5a6d2b9c6e7ca8b923661ca4e78087777 Narrative I've created the firs…
🤩103❤97🥰96❤🔥92👍92😍91🔥82💯72
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
$TRADEWORK 🪶 https://gmgn.ai/robinhood/token/minecode_0xc232cd5dadc2e15523bbcaf0fe0992be8b3b86fb https://x.com/tradeworkfun
❤100😍99🥰94💯85🔥85❤🔥82🤩77👍75
Signed 曹懷東|Huai-Dong Cao
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @CHINAGEMOFCCCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 662,799 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 212,368
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptogems55552 · 124,447
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@ChinapumpWXC · 109,942
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@pumpcoinbets · 1,010,303
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@Crypto_KingCall · 102,320
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@Gemhunterrs · 589,892
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
@airdropcomic · 361,052
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中国加密跨链网络||GEMS OF CCCCN💎” (@CHINAGEMOFCCCN), 82,775 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHINAGEMOFCCCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.