Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Angry Birds Calls™📢

@Angrybirdscalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,311subscribers

-6,062 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001773919132
TypeChannel
Username@Angrybirdscalls
DescriptionANGRYBIRDSCALLS 🦅 Owner: @Angrybirds_ceo (Always Verify) Premium Crypto Calls • Market Insights • Early Opportunities 🎲 Degen Hub: t.me/Angrybirdgambles 💬 Insider Hub: t.me/Angrybirdlounges 𝕏 X: x.com/angrybirdscalls DYOR • Trade Smart • Stay Early
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Angrybirdscalls

Growth

23,65936,37330,0166 August 2026 — 36,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,371 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,136 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,920 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,655 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,659 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,425 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,311 subscribers30,3116 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6,062. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,752–38,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:3530,311-114
12 Aug 2026, 02:3230,425+6,766
11 Aug 2026, 04:0623,659-11,996
10 Aug 2026, 06:4735,655-265
9 Aug 2026, 03:1135,920-216
8 Aug 2026, 00:1236,136-235
6 Aug 2026, 22:5636,371-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:3236,373first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 30,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,000
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.477%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held42 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total168,197
Reactions total589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,190
Videos
194
Links
1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
25s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

589 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥38565.4%
9115.4%
👍254.24%
🎉203.40%
😍172.89%
❤‍🔥132.21%
😁122.04%
🤩111.87%
💯71.19%
🥰50.849%
👏30.509%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 589reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC≈3,450 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Gm gm!! https://x.com/angrybirdscalls/status/2087758316348866924?s=46

10🔥10

12 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC≈3,750 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚀 $WENCAT ATH: $160k (2x) NOW: $100k Another good dev who doesn’t give up good to see 🚀

🔥10

12 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,990 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Most people discover coins after influencers post charts. Members saw $MARIO64 at 45.2k MC. 62.4x later everyone suddenly becomes a believer. The edge was never conviction. The edge was timing.

🔥10

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈4,240 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

NAME: Wen Cat NETWORK: 🔥RBH ABOUT: $WENCAT was born from crypto’s favorite question: WEN? Good narrative and branding. Recent launch. Following cat meta. Degen. Always do your own research. TG: https://t.me/WenCatRH X: https://x.com/WenCatrh WEB: https://thewencat.com DEX: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xb86c8358F7753E188e588411E9f04e4488cE850E 0xb86c8358F7753E188e588411E9f04e4488cE850E DISCLAIMER Always re

5👏3🎉2👍1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈4,230 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

been another day of crazy rotations in the trenches, but $ORANGE is still holding strong here around $1M or so as it preps its next move. hoping to see another leg up soon, as they've got around 2K holders now with the community forming nicely and doing some crazy IRL marketing stunts, like sending actual oranges to Michael Saylor's office: https://x.com/revolut20/status/2087169134195085573 again, been a wild day

🔥6🤩3❤‍🔥2💯2😍21🎉1🥰1

12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC≈4,470 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Time to load up on FOMO and cook with you guys I’ve had some really good calls in the past and made some solid 6-figs on $CASHCAT and a few others. Personally, I feel trading privately is pretty chill, but trading publicly comes with a different level of responsibility. When people are watching and potentially following your trades, you have to be a lot more mindful of what you put out.

🔥32

11 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈4,700 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

$DEALER I called this and dropped the video last night. It already ran hard since then. The key points are still the exact same. Most people chase pumps. I track the structure before the crowd arrives. 30% with Ansem. Dev sending real size to $NORMIE — big balls and the powder to back it with serious weight. $ANSEM whales loading heavy. I’ve watched more $5-10M runners print in these trenches. Follow the $ANSEM whale

❤‍🔥3🎉32👍1💯1🔥1🤩1🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,840 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

$MUMU back above $1M MC, accumulating and ranging nicely. Weak hands are getting shaken out while stronger holders remain positioned. If the range breaks, this could move fast. 👀 0x8eC17C059f250A5c19566C3fC56EE13A343dD283

🔥31

11 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC75 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

This guy just took over $PARKIFY Go to his channel and you’ll see the viral things he’s done , he’s INSANELY good at the algorithm and getting attention Elon engages with him, phantom many times, he’s had 10m+ views on tweets and had articles about him etc, if there’s one person who can get everyone using South Park it’s him ( attached pics of some things he’s done before ) 7Syw6tu4Jx692uhoryjok5yBwTqje1oftit9E3L

🔥19

10 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈3,640 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Looking to add trenchers, and bag workers to my trenching gc. We’ve been crushing it, mashallah. Alhamdulilah. 🙏 If you are interested shoot me a dm via Twitter, and send me your recent scans. Won’t reply if scans aren’t sent. 🫡 Lets cook. 🤝

🔥171

10 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC≈3,560 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Let me give an exact run down on Oggie as people need to realize how crazy this narrative is It was a frog created in 1964 by R. crumb. Matt Furie stated he was a fan of R. Crumb and that’s where the inspiration for Pepe came from ( look at the designs they’re identical ) Binance article in 2024 also stated that it was the inspiration for Pepe Source https://www.binance.com/en-KZ/square/post/15052780002714 Even

4😍3❤‍🔥2👍2🎉1💯1🔥1🤩1

9 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC≈3,810 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Matt Furie aped $BOYZ on FOMO 👀 The OG meme creator is officially in. This is fucking bullish. 0x49d8022cfa113dadb8cb1a5b22250524cf24b926

🔥15😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @Angrybirdscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 32,584 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Airdrop Comic
@airdropcomic · 320,108
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳
@CODYWHALESCALLS · 202,162
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Angry Birds Calls™📢” (@Angrybirdscalls), 30,311 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Angrybirdscalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.