5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,282–1,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:16
1,286
-16
11 Aug 2026, 03:25
1,302
-10
7 Aug 2026, 22:32
1,312
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:03
1,312
-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
1,314
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
50.0%
💯
1
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$CDLC Crème De La Crema 🍮
$CDLC is built on Solana speed + meme culture, but with an actual attempt at branding and identity. Not just another random ticker, this is positioning itself as the premium meme.
CA: 6oLycKuJqRiz7Vw3EjAjmQstZLCcnHDbWd729Vdipump
Dev has locked 10% supply via Streamflow
https://app.streamflow.finance/contract/solana/mainnet/D8accve8rjdEsznrGRQhboNkYecrVzdBKoLDrBG2enZh
📊 Chart:
https://dex…
$EDDI
Matt Furies latest character posted on Instagram with a reply to the dev from Furie
TG: https://t.me/EddieByMattFurie
CN TG: https://t.me/EddieByMattfurie_CN
X: https://x.com/EddieByFurie
Web: https://eddiebymattfurie.com
CA: 0xefc82BA0372390e0C5d78E4F199266F3e57d637C
https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x1fe12e5149ca7ef257caefd649eb5641e6f016c3
Japanese Fish ($KOI) swims out of Japan’s legendary koi culture 🏯🐟
CA 5FwVockJAErqGHxz5YMJvfFNKh8BR97BdEFfNwffiKoi
A lucky fish meme on Solana, now trading on Raydium — smooth currents, strong vibes, and pure koi energy.
https://x.com/i/communities/2010572353592525207
https://t.me/KoiOnSol
https://koitoken.online
$PURWHALE SOL 🪙🪙
Recent launch, good branding and ticker, degen gamble for now. DYOR NFA. Following WHITEWHALE meta.
CRiSYdYEdffDTm5ipF2x8EU8fAfjQ7aLGfLZj4rPpump
The Purple Whale
Official socials:
Tg : https://t.me/purplewhalecommunity
https://x.com/i/communities/2009343395517682006
Website : https://purplewhale.live
🪙 大黄 $大黄
🔗 BNB | DS | XC
🧢 $1.06M MC at call
-
Powered by @apeclickerbot
Signed Ape Clicker Bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bigwillycallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,284,155 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@bigwillycallz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@eddiebymattfurie_cn named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🐳CODY WHALES CALL 中國🐳 @CODYWHALESCALLS · 200,959 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BIGWILLY CALLS 1000x” (@bigwillycallz), 1,286 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigwillycallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
