Channel
@hjwnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,530subscribers
-628 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001458406476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hjwnews |
| Created | 14 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hjwnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 8,530 | -291 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 8,821 | -99 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 8,920 | -195 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 9,115 | -43 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 9,158 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 9,158 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (20 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,657 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hjwnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🥂 LBank x Pudgy Penguins 이벤트 소식 엘뱅크와 펏지펭귄의 콜라보로 약 50만불상당의 이벤트를 준비했습니다. 💸 기간 : 2026년 8월 7일 - 9월 3일 까지 💸 $PENGU Earn 보상 펭구 코인 예치하는 Earn 상품으로, 신규 뿐만 아니라 자격 있는 전체 유저 대상 이벤트 입니다 • 100 USDT 이상 : 15,000 PENGU 대상 60% 이자 부스트 쿠폰 • 500 USDT 이상 : 20,000 PENGU 대상 75% 이자 부스트 쿠폰 • 1,000 USDT 이상 : 30,000 PENGU 대상 100% 이자 부스트 쿠폰 * 여러 티어 조건 만족해도 쿠폰은 가장높은 티어로 1개만 지급 * 부스트는 3일간 적용됨 🥂 럭키드로우 선물 거래 미션 선물 거래량을 많이 만들수록 추첨 기회를 주는 미션입니다. 조…
Botanika 150만달러 유치 투자 라운드 종료! 보타니카? 1세대 DePIN이 겪었던 과도한 토큰 인플레이션과 실수요 부재 문제를 해결하겠다는 목표로 등장한 프로젝트 단순 DePIN 서사보다는 실물 하드웨어 노드 ‘NIMBUS’를 기반으로 AI 인프라 레이어를 구축한다는 점이 핵심인데요. 간단하게 아래 내용 체크하시면 될 듯합니다. 📌 프로젝트 핵심 목표 ⤵️ 단순 내러티브가 아닌 NIMBUS 실물 장비 기반 인프라 AI 연산 + 데이터 저장 구조 확보 AI × DePIN 결합 극초기 단계로 커뮤니티 선점 참여 유효 💰 시드 라운드 규모 체크 ⤵️ 시드 라운드 150만 달러 투자 유치 완료 DePIN + RWA + AI를 결합한 통합 인프라 표방 👀 투자자 라인업 ⤵️ 기관: CRIT Ventures, Baboon Ventures…
#ad 🔥 펑크비즘, 실물 TCG 컬렉터블 샵 ‘레어온(Rare-on)’ 런칭! 특급 IP + 실물 상품 + 한정판 TCG 카드 + 홀더 베네핏을 결합한 새로운 모델. ⚽️ 첫 번째 IP는 축구 레전드 호베르토 카를로스 WL 물량은 이미 완판됐으며, 8월 13일부터 얼리버드 사전구매가 시작됩니다. ✔️ 한정판 실물 TCG 카드 ✔️ 특별 랜덤박스 ✔️ 신청자 한정 카를로스 PFP NFT ✔️ 향후 라리가·스포츠 레전드·아트/엔터 IP 확장 예정 특히 완판 시 발생하는 수익 일부는 PVT 바이백·소각 및 조건을 충족한 공동창업자 대상 마케팅 용역료로 활용되는 구조. 실물 TCG와 강력한 IP를 웹3 커뮤니티와 어떻게 연결할지 지켜볼 만합니다. 🌐 레어온 공식 사이트 https://www.rare-on.com/ 📸 인스타그램 https://w…
다들 비트코인이 오르면 “이제 늦은 거 아니야?”부터 묻는다. 그런데 시장은 늘 이상하게 움직인다. 정작 대부분이 포기하고, 타임라인에서 코인 얘기가 사라지고, “이번 사이클 끝났다”는 말이 반복될 때 조용히 다음 판을 준비하는 프로젝트들이 나온다. 처음에는 아무도 관심이 없다. 거래량도 없고, 커뮤니티도 조용하고, 정보를 찾아봐도 “이걸 왜 봐야 하지?” 싶은 느낌이다. 하지만 시간이 지나면 판이 바뀐다. 누군가는 기술을 만들고, 누군가는 유동성을 쌓고, 누군가는 사용자와 파트너를 모으고, 누군가는 시장이 다시 주목할 순간을 기다린다. 그리고 사람들은 늘 결과가 보인 뒤에야 몰린다. “이거 왜 이제 알았지?” “그때 살걸.” “다음 좋은 거 있으면 꼭 알려줘.” 하지만 기회는 대개 소리 내서 오지 않는다. 시끄러운 곳보다 조용한 곳에 먼저 …
당분간 정보성 핫뉴스위주로 업로드가 많아질예정입니다
카카오 실적발표 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 순이익 ;; 예상 대비 10% 수준 ㄷㄷㄷ
🇺🇸 미국 경제지표 발표 (8월 6일) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 신규 실업수당청구건수 (Initial Jobless Claims) 🔴 실제: 199K ⚪️ 예상: 203K 🔵 이전: 198K ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ 시장 해석 📉 신규 실업수당청구건수는 199K로 발표되며 예상치(203K)를 하회했습니다. 💼 이는 미국 고용시장이 여전히 견조한 모습을 유지하고 있음을 시사하는 결과입니다. 📊 다만 이전치(198K)보다는 소폭 증가했지만, 시장이 우려할 수준의 악화는 아닌 것으로 평가됩니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 시장 영향 • 고용시장 강세 신호로 달러에는 긍정적으로 작용할 가능성이 있습니다. • 연준의 금리 인하 기대는 다소 약해질 수 있습니다. • 비트코인, 나스닥, 미국 증시는 시장 참여자들의 해석에 따라 단기 변동성이…
축협 성접대 의혹으로 런던올림픽 동메달 박탈 가능성 그럼 군면제 취소되는 선수들이 몇명이냐
🚀 Squid의 새로운 챕터 시작! 성공적으로 $QUID 퍼블릭 세일을 마친 Squid가 이제 New Era를 준비중입니다. New Era 페이지에서 이메일을 등록하면 $QUID 출시 소식과 앞으로 공개될 새로운 업데이트를 가장 먼저 받을수 있다고합니다. 👉 https://newera.squidrouter.com 📊 Squid의 발자취 💰 $6.35B 거래 규모 🔄 500만+ 거래 👥 120만+ 사용자 🪙 1 Token
WLFI / USD1 — 2026년 상반기 핵심 성과 • USD1 공급량 53억 달러 돌파 솔라나에서는 6개월 만에 1.15억 달러 → 10억 달러로 성장했으며, 현재 8개 이상의 체인으로 네이티브 확장을 완료했습니다. • 백악관 UFC 대회, USD1으로 선수 보너스 지급 미국 건국 250주년 기념 UFC Freedom 250에서 선수 보너스가 전액 USD1으로 지급되며, 스테이블코인의 실사용 사례를 만들었습니다. • WLFI Markets 빠른 성장 출시 2주 만에 3.1억 달러 공급, 현재는 총 시장 규모 7.34억 달러, 활성 대출 2.62억 달러를 기록하며 USD1의 활용처를 넓히고 있습니다. • 미국 OCC 연방 은행 면허 신청 승인될 경우 중간 은행 없이 달러를 직접 보관·발행하는 최초의 크립토 네이티브 스테이블코인을 목표…
Gno.land 첫 퍼블릭 세일 오픈 Cosmos 공동창립자이자 Tendermint 창시자 Jae Kwon이 약 6년간 개발한 Gno.land가 메인넷을 앞두고 첫 GNOT 퍼블릭 세일을 시작! 🔗 참여 📅 일정 • 시작: 7월 20일 오후 9시 (KST) • 종료: 7월 27일 오후 9시 (KST) Tendermint는 수많은 L1의 기반이 된 합의 엔진입니다. ✅ BNB Chain — Tendermint + Cosmos SDK 기반으로 시작 ✅ Hyperliquid — 초기 L1을 Tendermint 위에 구축한 뒤, 이후 자체 HyperBFT로 발전 ✅ dYdX V4 ✅ Kava, Band Protocol, IRISnet, Coreum, Umee 등 즉, 지금도 주요 블록체인들의 기반 기술을 만든 개발자가 직접 만든 L1 프로젝트입니…
❤1
Q402 × Lista 연동: 노는 스테이블에 이자지급 세부내용 Q402 Agent Wallet 유휴 스테이블코인을 BNB Lista 볼트에 자동 예치해 이자 발생 MCP 한 번 호출로 가스비 없이 예치 완료 키는 로컬 보관, 메인 지갑과 분리해 보안 유지 단순 결제를 넘어 남은 자금까지 자동 운용하는 자금 관리 레이어 제공 트윗보기 #Q402 #QuackAI
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @hjwnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,426,831 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoinFluencer P2E&NFT” (@hjwnews), 8,530 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hjwnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.