Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 357,307–360,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 22:11
357,718
-408
10 Aug 2026, 20:01
358,126
-601
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
358,727
-421
8 Aug 2026, 20:17
359,148
-490
7 Aug 2026, 18:01
359,638
-527
6 Aug 2026, 21:13
360,165
-296
6 Aug 2026, 01:30
360,461
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:24
360,461
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
158
Videos
43
Links
152
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 59s
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,903 reactions across 16 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
432
22.7%
👍
290
15.2%
🔥
282
14.8%
🎉
197
10.4%
🤩
186
9.77%
👏
135
7.09%
🥰
126
6.62%
❤🔥
68
3.57%
💯
47
2.47%
😍
31
1.63%
⚡
29
1.52%
🏆
27
1.42%
👾
10
0.525%
🍾
8
0.42%
🐳
7
0.368%
🤝
6
0.315%
🦄
6
0.315%
👌
5
0.263%
😎
3
0.158%
🆒
2
0.105%
3 further kinds
6
0.315%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,903reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 16 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bittonapp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2025 to 11 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪙 BITTON 2.0 — Strategic Direction
Let’s bring some clarity.
Bitton 2.0 is not an update of the interface and mechanics.
It is a full-scale infrastructure shift.
🔥 What we are building now:
🔘 Telegram-native infrastructure for engagement and earning
🔘 A BTN model built on real utility
🔘 Partner performance campaigns
🔘 Automated participation mechanics
🔘 A long-term economic framework
1) No wrappers built around …
🐲 BITTON 2.0 — A New Chapter
Hello friends, and welcome aboard our new aircraft, “DragonWing”, operated by BitTon Airlines 👨✈️✈️
Over the past few months, we’ve slightly reduced our public activity.
But not because we stopped — because we were rebuilding.
❤️ BitToN started as an early PoA model with NFT elements and leader-driven marketing mechanics.
We tested the system, grew the community, and learned the main …
💎 TON launches tokenized shares and ETFs
Friends, we’re finally back from our trips — we closed several partnerships, held preliminary talks with multiple companies and gathered a lot of useful stuff 🐲
Let’s start with the news:
Great update from the TON ecosystem — at TOKEN2049 the team announced the launch of tokenized shares and ETFs.
🚀 This is a huge step that could attract unimaginable liquidity from around t…
🚀 WE ARE AT THE TOKEN2049 CONFERENCE!
Dear friends, we have reached Singapore and are now on the most important Web3 platform of this year - TOKEN2049!
The atmosphere is beyond words, very powerful energy 🔥
Lots of insights and insides, hot news related to the TON blockchain!
We can't wait to share everything, but first things first 💎
Let us remind you that XChangeON are the official platinum partners of this con…
🐲 AUTO-CLICKER IS ENABLED FOR EVERYONE
📢 BitToNians, don't forget that everyone has access to the FREE AutoClicker!
Don't forget to log in and click the OFF/ON button.
And you'll also receive daily increasing rewards 😉
We have implemented this feature for all BitToN members to help them save time, as we mentioned in this post.
Do you want to know what an AutoClicker is?
Let's see how the new feature will change …
🎙 Join us for a webinar!
Bittonians, today, September 17th at 9:00 PM India time! 🇮🇳
Our Indian community will be hosting an exciting webinar where they’ll share insights about our ongoing projects and future plans.
🪙 Topic: BITTON on TON
🗓 Date: 17 September
⏰ Time:
7:30 PM Dubai time 🇦🇪
9:00 PM India time 🇮🇳
10:30 PM Bangkok time 🇹🇭
📍 Where: Zoom
🔐 Passcode: 123123
Don't miss out — make sure to join us and …
🔥 The process of withdrawing funds from XChangeON 🤖
In this video, we show a real withdrawal from XChangeON and analyze how our trading bot Kraanti worked.
💸 Kraanti earns from price differences (arbitrage) — not directional trading.
That means it can generate profits in both bull and bear markets.
🪙 And don’t forget about our joint campaign with XChangeOn — plus free bonuses for your arbitrage deposits!
Enjoy t…
🪙 How to earn a bunch of $BTN?
To begin with, let me introduce you what PoA is:
🛡 Proof-of-Action (PoA) — literally "proof of action".
Developed by our team, this innovative algorithm is deemed the most equitable, while still being profitable and not requiring expensive equipment like in PoW (Proof-of-Work), or financial investments like in PoS (Proof-of-Stake).
In PoA, the mining of coins is carried out solely th…
❤16🔥5⚡4🤩3🫡2❤🔥1🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bittonapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 358,126 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Hard To Be Crypto @h2becrypto · 285,316 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
DeBrief | Crypto News @de_brief · 217,503 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BITTON - Engage. Earn. Scale.” (@bittonapp), 357,718 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bittonapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.