7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,235–9,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:53
9,238
-5
11 Aug 2026, 02:26
9,243
-4
9 Aug 2026, 10:08
9,247
-11
7 Aug 2026, 17:31
9,258
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
9,258
+15
6 Aug 2026, 04:40
9,243
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:06
9,243
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
57.8%
avg views ÷ 9,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,340
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (8 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
48,020
Reactions total
1,030
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
73
Videos
11
Links
79
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
38s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,301 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5390981622101223272
397
30.5%
custom 5199528206431981121
254
19.5%
custom 5438249300561792814
149
11.5%
custom 5197191203057079105
124
9.53%
custom 5305487794108405635
111
8.53%
custom 5460813701525309456
69
5.30%
custom 5409350497146540872
54
4.15%
custom 5244603299792986288
53
4.07%
custom 5375438457579540146
42
3.23%
custom 5330420418564106772
31
2.38%
custom 5334581434420073897
17
1.31%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
691
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 13 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
334
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plushpepe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Last week we showed four Plush Pepes that were never upgraded.
This is what their owners chose to skip.
💰 One tap, a few seconds, and the original is gone for good. No way back.
Here is the full list of models that can come out of it. Just a reminder of what is actually in there: 50 models, 14 at 1%, 22 at 2%, 14 at 3%.
🤷 The model alone does not decide the price. The backdrop, the symbol and the number matter ju…
Have you ever seen a Plush Pepe exactly as it looked before upgrades?
🏆 All Plush Pepes were originally purchased on December 1, 2024. Upgrades only arrived in January 2025.
Most have changed since then, but some still remain exactly as they were.
🐸 Today we would like to show you four of these originals, held by two members of the Plush Pepe Club.
@capper has kept three Plush Pepes untouched, while @balance_new …
Yesterday, we noticed that a Plush Pepe had been sold for an unusually low price, so we contacted the person whose account it was sold from.
⛔️ He told us that during a call with a potential buyer, he turned on screen sharing. The caller then sent him Telegram Stars. When he opened the message, a Telegram login code appeared on the screen. The caller saw the code, accessed the account and sold the Plush Pepe.
⚠️ We…
This is exactly where Plush Pepe lives.
🥂 Channel for the story.
😎 Club for the culture.
🔨 Market for trading.
🏆 Sales feed for movement.
🤖 Bot for data.
👍 Stickers for conversation.
📈 Floor prices stickers for market talk.
❤️ Emoji for everyday identity.
All connected by one collectible, worn on Telegram profiles and shared across its communities.
Not just a community on @Telegram
A community that grew aro…
🐸 Eight Cozy Galaxies.
🐸 And the historic Plush Pepe #2.
@fugui, a member of the Plush Pepe Club, has assembled one of the most valuable Plush Pepe collections displayed on Telegram.
The Cozy Galaxy model has a 1% rarity — and several of these collectibles rank among the most expensive Plush Pepes ever sold.
Based on the latest recorded transaction for each collectible, the nine gifts total:
$1,364,230 💎787,786
…
🕶 Telegram showcased the Plush Pepe community in action.
Telegram introduced a new way to use bots privately inside group chats. With ephemeral commands, both your command and the bot’s response stay invisible to everyone else.
To demonstrate the feature, Telegram used 😎 @plushpepeclub and @plushbot — a bot built by the Plush Pepe community — with familiar commands like /floor, /sales and /search.
🤖 Try the comman…
Status is earned over time.
😎 Plush Pepe Club is introducing a tier system that reflects how long each member has remained continuously in the Club.
Newbie: 0–7 days
Rookie: 8–30 days
Resident: 31–90 days
Veteran: 91–180 days
OG: 181–365 days
Legend: 365+ days
Roles and day counts update automatically.
Only uninterrupted membership counts. If you sell your Plush Pepe and lose access to the Club, your progress res…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @plushpepe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 27,918 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PLUSH PEPE” (@plushpepe), 9,238 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plushpepe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
