$REPE wants to run 0x5266eeafF092D6136AB63D18B975A60a0Cc0C8f7 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
🎅327🌭163🍾65😈64🏆63🍌43

Channel
@BlockWawe_cr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
180,936subscribers
-1,220 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002172331776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlockWawe_cr |
| Description | Riding the crypto wave before everyone else Memecoins · degen calls · daily alpha. Not financial advice. 👑 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 — @TradersHayzon 🤝 𝐀𝐝𝐬 & 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬 — @HAYZON_Contacts 💎 𝐕𝐈𝐏 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 — @CryptoPR_Network |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlockWawe_cr |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 180,936 | -294 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 181,230 | -294 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 181,524 | -350 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 181,874 | -282 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 182,156 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 182,156 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (21 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 272,000 |
| Reactions total | 11,122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11,122 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 2,555 | 23.0% | |
| 🏆 | 2,144 | 19.3% | |
| 🌭 | 1,863 | 16.8% | |
| 🎅 | 1,744 | 15.7% | |
| 🍌 | 1,538 | 13.8% | |
| 🍾 | 1,278 | 11.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$REPE wants to run 0x5266eeafF092D6136AB63D18B975A60a0Cc0C8f7 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
🎅327🌭163🍾65😈64🏆63🍌43
Also another crazy interesting fact $REPE is trading at a higher marketcap than where it was trading when it started its run over 1 month ago 😂 How many Robinhood tokens can confidently say they’re trading higher than where they were a month ago? NONE. That’s what can only be achieved a real community of believers that will ride or die for their bags. FROG WORLD ORDER 🐸 0x5266eeafF092D6136AB63D18B975A60a0Cc0C8f…
😈159🌭118🏆100🎅76🍌75🍾31
Good to see REPE going 2X from its floor overnight from Matt furie shilling $HOODRAT, $REPE and other Boyz club characters. Could be the start of its next big leg up if $CASHCAT and the other OG Robinhood memes continue to keep up momentum Beautiful chart, Beautiful Reversal momentum, Infinite upside. HIGHER. 0x5266eeafF092D6136AB63D18B975A60a0Cc0C8f7 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @Crypto…
🍌154🍾139🏆90🎅52😈47🌭41
Robinhood Pepe is also featured in the video by Hoodrat Matt furie commented on alongside other Matt furie characters btwwww 🤯 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
🏆174🌭71🍾64😈54🍌41🎅16
If $CASHCAT pump today points towards OG memes on Robinhood chain running This is good for Robinhood Pepe $REPE as it’s an OG meme. If Matt furie supporting $HOODRAT just kickstarted a Matt furie season and a $HOODRAT run to 10s of Millioms This is also good for Robinhood Pepe as it’s the most popular Matt furie character. There’s no OG run without REPE and there’s no Matt furie character without REPE Do you un…
🍌214🎅175🏆141🍾81😈74🌭51
wow godcandle on another OG Robinhood meme - $hoodrat 🙏 This is so insane because hoodrat is ALSO a Matt furie character just like Robinhood PEPE Matt Furie interacted with a HOODRAT post and it god candle’d Our prayers getting answered. what is good for the rat 🐀 is great for the frog $repe 🐸 I keep saying this, Robinhood Pepe will MELT faces. First a GOD CANDLE on the leader of the OG memes. Followed by a GO…
🌭150🍾101😈98🏆75🎅54🍌43
wow $cashcat godcandle 🙏 Our prayers getting answered. what is good for the cat 🐈 is great for the frog $repe 🐸 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
😈103🍾86🌭74🍌19🏆17🎅12
wow cashcat ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
🎅325😈85🍾65🌭56🏆32🍌24
Bought some $BLOCK and thought it was worth sharing It's a Minecraft-inspired SkyBlock game on Solana where players build their own islands, complete quests, collect over 50 different block types, trade on an in-game marketplace & earn rewards through gameplay The concept is familiar, the gameplay is easy to understand, and if the community continues to grow, this could become one of the top GameFi projects on Sola…
🌭184🎅152🏆64🍌55🍾43
🎧
😈282🍾167🍌153🏆151🌭86🎅76
GG 💪
😈307🍾138🍌60🎅52🏆52🌭51
0xc1a0bf772b80Ff771b3837E269813f7b62e047BE https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x729a922fd514f952d9cac76ab6225fe9844b34b5 https://x.com/riley_gmi/status/2081879203260112967 ———————————————————— 🐸 DEGEN WAVE 🦮 Ads & calls: @CryptoPR_Network
🏆250🌭173😈141🎅74🍾71🍌59
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BlockWawe_cr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 694,381 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEGEN WAVE” (@BlockWawe_cr), 180,936 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlockWawe_cr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.